I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Now I know why I'm here!

Email this conversation Print this conversation
User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 16:25

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/11192385/Sex-with-21-women-lowers-risk-of-prostate-cancer-academics-find.html

 

For prospective newsbies, can I suggest DYOR!  Of course, could increase your risk of catching somethine else!

 

flexi

 

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 20:21

I was once asked if I speak to my wife while making love....I said only if she phones me...boom boom

Bri

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 09:46

Sex with 20 women...must have been a big bed!

User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 16:25

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/11192385/Sex-with-21-women-lowers-risk-of-prostate-cancer-academics-find.html

 

For prospective newsbies, can I suggest DYOR!  Of course, could increase your risk of catching somethine else!

 

flexi

 

User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 22:23

Had all that fun, it was the 1970s after all, free love etc but did not do me much good. If it had been prescribed maybe would have avoided the need for all those chat up lines that were embarrassing! I am not sure why you have to have different partners as it sounds as if it's the process of ejaculation which decreases risk, which can be achieved with no partner !

User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 22:38

Obviously didn't work for me http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-frown.gif

Nil desperandum

Allister

User
Posted 30 Oct 2014 at 14:21
Every now and then an article like this appears and gives us all something to have a few jokes about. The fact that they say it is ejaculation (presumably exhuming semen makes the prostate work so much harder!!) I tend to agree with others, why not with one partner or DIY? Of course our elders would have said that the latter would make you go blind) Like Julie I am intrigued to know why the figure 21 .. I do not wish to lack PC but isn't that the number of vestel virgins promised when you go to meet your maker?

Whatever next....

Mo

User
Posted 30 Oct 2014 at 19:35

I'm having someone read for me as I can't see very well

Bri

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 22:01
Wow!

Think of the fun I could have had protecting myself against Prostate Cancer!

Steve

Edited by member 28 Oct 2014 at 22:02  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 22:23

Had all that fun, it was the 1970s after all, free love etc but did not do me much good. If it had been prescribed maybe would have avoided the need for all those chat up lines that were embarrassing! I am not sure why you have to have different partners as it sounds as if it's the process of ejaculation which decreases risk, which can be achieved with no partner !

User
Posted 28 Oct 2014 at 22:38

Obviously didn't work for me http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-frown.gif

Nil desperandum

Allister

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 09:46

Sex with 20 women...must have been a big bed!

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 10:13

Find this a little strange. If this is down to ejaculations (which it mentioned), surely high frequency with one or a few partners would equate to a similar number of occasions with more participants. Then what about the men who masturbate frequently, would this not have the same effect? In other words is it not frequency rather than a number of partners?

Barry
User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 16:21

The researchers were of the view that men with only one partner have less sex than men who sleep around. I think it says more about the researchers' relationships than anything else!

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 20:21

I was once asked if I speak to my wife while making love....I said only if she phones me...boom boom

Bri

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 21:37

But the Daily Male, sorry Mail manages to tell me that regular sex is a) good for me and b) bad for me, both in the same article. Come to think of it, most bits of the body benefit from regular, but not over use, so why shouldn't the same principle apply to prostates?

My Gran's maxim in life was "Everything in moderation" (including evil beetroot and cucumber sandwiches) and she survived until she was 93.

Maybe I'm being too simplistic. Time for bed (to sleep. Prostate is 120 miles away so I can't exercise it).

Tony

TURP then LRP in 2009/2010. Lots of leakage but PSA < 0.1 AMS-800 Artificial Sphincter activated 2015.

User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 22:26

http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-laughing.gifhttp://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-laughing.gifhttp://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-laughing.gifThanks Bri for that joke  first proper laugh in ages. All I can say is what a load of Twoddle. I hope it is not tax payers money paying for these surveys.

BFN

Julie X

NEVER LAUGH AT A LIVE DRAGON
User
Posted 29 Oct 2014 at 22:28

PS Who came up with the number 21 http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif

BFN

Julie X

 

NEVER LAUGH AT A LIVE DRAGON
User
Posted 30 Oct 2014 at 14:21
Every now and then an article like this appears and gives us all something to have a few jokes about. The fact that they say it is ejaculation (presumably exhuming semen makes the prostate work so much harder!!) I tend to agree with others, why not with one partner or DIY? Of course our elders would have said that the latter would make you go blind) Like Julie I am intrigued to know why the figure 21 .. I do not wish to lack PC but isn't that the number of vestel virgins promised when you go to meet your maker?

Whatever next....

Mo

User
Posted 30 Oct 2014 at 16:29

21 gives you about a week off per month to get some sleep. Lack of sleep is bad for the prostate (probably).

Tony

TURP then LRP in 2009/2010. Lots of leakage but PSA < 0.1 AMS-800 Artificial Sphincter activated 2015.

User
Posted 30 Oct 2014 at 19:35

I'm having someone read for me as I can't see very well

Bri

User
Posted 31 Oct 2014 at 19:45
Bad boy Bri xxx
User
Posted 31 Oct 2014 at 22:17
Enjoying the banter! A sense of humour really is good medicine.

Best wishes to all.

User
Posted 31 Oct 2014 at 22:55

Right so what were we talking about, oh yes it was Bri's eye sight I remember know. I thought you said you had 21, 21 vision Bri.http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif

So 21 is the Magic number boys, we all know this is also or used to be the number of the key to the door.http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif

BFN

Julie X

NEVER LAUGH AT A LIVE DRAGON
User
Posted 01 Nov 2014 at 15:31
and the number of guns fired in a 21 gun salute ....and the best hand in Blackjack ( see I did learn something in Las Vegas)

xx

Mo

 
Forum Jump  
Email this conversation Print this conversation

Join the online community now.

Click through to become a member and gain access to support, information and real time replies.




MenuTop ▲
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK