Have had a bit more time to put together some more info. on yesterdays consultation which as I said went VERY well.
I had been told that brachytherapy may well not be a suitable treatment for me because of lower urinary problems and a medium IPSS score (see: http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urospec.com%2Furo%2FForms%2Fipss.pdf&ei=BtnIVMfHKMrXaqbkgYgP&usg=AFQjCNF-QIoHvWgGxeYqUphwPJzE3AoD-w&bvm=bv.84607526,d.d2s).
My IPSS score came out at 18. The ultrasound detected what was causing the main problem in that a lobe of the prostate had grown and was ‘pressing’ on the urethra causing an urethral stricture close to where the urethra connects with the bladder.
However, all it not lost in that I can have a limited TURP to remove the stricture followed about 3 months later by the brachytherapy.
I also learnt that the conventional biopsy can’t reach all parts of the prostate to check out the spread of the cancer. My consultant says he will carry out another, different biopsy procedure, whilst I am under the anesthetic (during the limited TURP) to check the rest of the prostate. The cancer has apparently been upgraded by the initial consultant I had at a different hospital to Gleason 4+3 (rather than 3+4) but apparently the same hospital told my consultant that they had also had downgraded the % cancer they found when they carried out the conventional biopsy. They hadn’t told me this!
Apparently it may be possible if the cancer is as localized as they think to perform a new type of procedure where they treat (by brachytherapy) only the part of the prostate where the cancer is and not the whole of the prostate as is conventional. The wonders of medical science!
As I said above, the message is if you want brachytherapy and you are initially told it's not suitable for you because of pre-treatment lower urinary problems....... check it out, get a second opinion if necessary, there may well be a solution.
dl