I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

<123

my brother in January, now me!

User
Posted 30 Mar 2016 at 17:39

I think I have already made this comment to you DW but will say it here just in case.

Statistically, anyone who needs salvage treatment of any kind is less likely to achieve remission in the long term. In other words, there is no such thing as a second bite of the cherry. If that is true, it is important to choose the treatment most likely to be most successful - it is flawed thinking to settle for a treatment on the basis that if it fails, there are still other things to go for.

Of course, once you have worked out which treatment is most likely to result in a cure, you then have to decide whether you are willing to accept the potential risks of that treatment. Some men will opt for a treatment which has less potential for permanent side effects accepting that the chance of full remission may be a little lower.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 30 Mar 2016 at 20:52
Not so sure about second bite of the cherry. A distant family member had prostate cancer return 3 times over many years. He had 3 different lots of treatment and did not die from prostate cancer. (I have no other details just that it returned many years after treatment on 3 occasions) perhaps he was very lucky.
Also Lyn you say some treatments are less likely to cure. When I researched I could only find the same statistics (30% chance of recurring with low grade) for the 3 most common treatments. I could find no statistics stating either as better. Not sure where I missed the information.

Edited by member 30 Mar 2016 at 20:55  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 30 Mar 2016 at 21:53

No, you haven't missed anything. If all other things are equal then there is no difference in success rates between surgery and IMRT (survival to 10 years and reaching 10 years disease free) and when you look at 5 year data there is no apparent difference between surgery, IMRT and brachy.

What I was saying was that if a specific man's best chance of cure is advised to be RT + 3 years HT but he doesn't like the idea of HT side effects, he may decide to opt for RT with 1 year of HT, understanding that this might reduce his chance of cure very slightly. Another man may be told that surgery is the best option for him but he decides to opt for AS, understanding that this may be a bit riskier in the long term but more acceptable to him in the short term. Or the man who could have surgery but is frightened of general anaesthetic might opt for radiotherapy.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 30 Mar 2016 at 21:58

I think your example of the distant family member sort of proves my point, three treatments but he never got a cure. I was making a generalisation - some men do get to full remission after salvage treatment. But all the research says that once the first treatment fails, the chance of further treatment fully eradicating the cancer is greatly reduced.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 04 Apr 2016 at 12:41

Hi Arthur


Thanks for the tip re Harlow...I now have an appointment there this Wednesday to discuss HIFU treatment. My worry, with whatever I choose, is that it will return!!


 


David

User
Posted 04 Apr 2016 at 13:43

I think is always a worry David. I spent a lot of time looking at the various treatments open to me - surgery, high dose brachytherapy, convential radio therapy and the more recently available "dose painting" radio therapy. I have chosen the latter. A key factor for me was the possible side effects and this tilted me away from surgery. It's natural to revisit your decision and wonder if it was the right one.


Of course, with any cancer, there is always the possibility of recurrence but I think it is advisable to think of the positives. Even if it does return, modern treatments can give you many more years of useful life.


All the best


Peter


 

User
Posted 18 May 2016 at 09:57

UPDATE

Well, after last week's RALP I kept quiet just to have a break, to be honest!

It went well, so I was told, and the frozen pathology during the surgery showed clear margins to keep both bundles. If I hadnt had it done this way, at this hospital (patholgy during surgery) I would have lost one bundle, for sure. Lymph nodes taken as promised.

A week has gone and catheter came out yesterday. I was surprised I didnt gush at once, but in fact held on till I had to go 1-2 hrs later, and controlled it, so we will see. A dry first night.

A shorter penis for sure, but it's early days. They have given me cialis but not to use it for 3 weeks...?

Being the worrier, my fear is the lymph nodes are psoitive. The MRI says not. Surgeon said 18% chance with my stats of being positive, which is why deciding NOT to choose HIFU was probably correct.....what would happen if my nodes are positive, using HIFU?

So we will wait and see, but apart from the pain in that one hole (sneezing or coughing BURNS!!), I'm doing ok, and thank you all.

David

User
Posted 18 May 2016 at 12:44

Hello again David.

Glad that's over and done with for you. Good signs with the catheter removal - long may that continue.

I'll let the men answer the shorter penis bit since they can word it much better than me, but I know that there are exercises that can be done. Something about "swinging" I think !!!!?

Keep a positive attitude on the lymph nodes. Concentrate on getting over the op for now and deal with the other aspects IF you have to.

All the best

Sandra

We can't control the winds - but we can adjust our sails
User
Posted 09 Sep 2016 at 07:21

Well, here we are in September. I got continent quickly after the op in May, ed still total, and the lymph nodes were clear. But there was a bit gone into the seminal vesicles so I ended up with T3b. Blast. Anyway, first psa in July was <0·02, which was brilliant.
Second psa result yesterday 0.04. Bit surprised. All was well removed so surely any rogue cells that had already escaped had had many months or even years to produce some psa, but clearly had not through to July.....yet 8 weeks later have done?!
Strangley, I had seen the RT man the day before this result, in case rt was needed down the line. He said, on hearing the slight rise, that it could be a blip, and could settle down again, especially as it is still 0.0x
So a discussion, and another psa in 6 weeks. He says 3 rises are needed and rt would only happen if we get to 0.2, or close to it. If the 0.04 is genuine, then it looks likely I will be going down the rt route, which is a real blow.....

David

User
Posted 09 Sep 2016 at 08:20
D

After twelve months of consistent 0.03 PSA results the 18 month test was a disappointing 0.06. The next two tests came back at 0.04 and 0.05 so at least a fluctuation and not a steady increase.(This is an extract from a previous post).

March this year was 0.07 and June was 0.13. Next PSA is just over two weeks away.

Hope yours turns out to be a blip.

Even at 0.06 my medical team kept saying it is still low and may have been caused by all the urethral procedures.

To follow on from your questions in another conversation I agree with B the less sensitive test may cause less anxiety, but provided you can get some consistency in your tests, it potentially can show a trend. With the less sensitive test I would have been classed as undetectable for two years and then detectable.

Thanks Chris
User
Posted 09 Sep 2016 at 08:27

Thanks Chris

And how have you coped with any fear because of the possible increase, knowing it could lead to RT, and even HT? It makes me feel a bit weak and sick, as the undetectable first PSA and clear margins etc had started to give me hope I had got through the worst. Now I am far from sure...

User
Posted 09 Sep 2016 at 15:58

D


With positive margins I was always told there was a 30 per cent chance of recurrence. By and large I just get on with life, it is always lurking at the back of my mind, but I only have to look at the stories on here to realise the are plenty of options still open to me. My consultant told me he had lots of patients who peak at 0.1 and never go above.


Stay positive.


Thanks Chris

User
Posted 09 Sep 2016 at 18:23
Hi David,
I hope you get a low result next time.
I too have just seen the oncologist (after having a second clear psa test) and he recommended keeping a close eye on future results with the option to begin rt as soon as any movement occurs. It's interesting how recommendations vary.
Regards Vic
 
Forum Jump  
<123
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK