Hi All,
Back from my HIFU consultation at St Margaret's, part of Harlow trust. 90 minutes late for everyone but nevermind! Long way there too.
So, he was straight into assuming this is what I want, as I had been referred out of county. He said that with what is known so far, I am suitable. But he said a plate Biopsy is needed and to book it in for a week Monday. We said we would have to think about it after we had finished discussions with him today, but in fact I agreed later on. I knew this might be needed but I guess was hoping my MRI and normal biopsy might have been enough, especially as the Plate one needs a General, and a Catheter for a day or two...and it's only about 6 weeks since my other Biopsy!
Anyway, the point is that it will give a much better picture and, as he said, even if it means I don't then do HIFU due to too much cancer being found, it will show that Brachy is needed instead(or surgery of course). Currently cancer in one side only. So I guess I could still go for Brachy or Surgery after this Biopsy....with HIFU in reserve if Brachy fails?
Driving down there, with my wife, I was in a bit of turmoil...what to choose etc. Naturally, after today, surgery seems less appealing again, even though it may be the chicken in me rather than doing the SLIGHTLY better thing long-term. One just does not know. Yesterday I was 'on' for surgery!
So today, right now, I'm more minded to do the Brachy, with HIFU later if it returns (that 60-80% chance!!)...or the magic pill that they will have developed by then!
All thoughts on the Plate biopsy in terms of either how it is, or how good it is to have it done, most welcome.
Cheers,
David
[Age 56, Gleason 3+4, an 8mm tumour found in one side, possible other bits on same side. No symptoms at all.]