I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Decision time draws near

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 15:00

Reminder: Age 56, Gleason 3+4, PSA 13  No symptoms, all contained in one side only.

 

So today we saw a great consultant re Brachy. My options are RP, Brachy, or maybe HIFU. The Brachy man said to beware HIFU and make sure he's done 100s of procedures,as it's newer. I know this of course.

 

The problem is my age...youngish. Brachy would be my choice if I was older as it seems relatively free from problems. My problem is that there is a 40% chance of it returning from 5 years on etc. At my age, that's not good.  But maybe HIFU can come to the rescue then?  Maybe a pill will be around in 5 years?!! And Brachy can have ED too, though I suspect milder than with one saved nerve in RP, which is what I will get.

 

Surgery? Most likely to 'nail' it, but, well...it's surgery and all that.

 

All chat is most welcome!

 

Thanks guys,

 

David W

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 15:59
Hi David,

Some similar stats to yours (please see my profile). I opted for open surgery to "get it out of me" and rt as a back up should I need it. Now 5 or so weeks post op and feeling pretty good, no further treatment needed as the moment but am waiting for psa test in May. Dry after about 3 or 4 days, am on Cialis for ed that is showing signs of success. If I had my time again I wouldn't do anything differently. I hope this helps and any questions please let me know.

Cheers

AL

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 16:08

Hi David,

As you well know by now, no-one on here will be willing or able to give you a definitive answer to your dilemma.

There have been many here who have relayed their personal experiences and advice, including me.

It appears you have researched and spoken to all the experts in their particular field regarding possible treatment options, and you can do no more than that.

I guess as it's nearly decision time you will be a little apprehensive, which is perfectly understandable. 

There must be a treatment path that you are 'leaning' towards by now. 

You have to keep in mind, whichever route you decide to take there is always a chance of a bio chemical re-occurrence at any time in the future. 

Whichever way you choose to go I wish you well.

Luther


User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 16:12

David, did they explain why they thought the brachy only had a 60% chance of working for you? That is much lower than would usually be quoted so i am interested in the specialist's rationale.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 17:08

Instead of surgery I was offered " Bracchy ' but this in fact was 2 yrs Hormone Therapy with HDR Bracchy AND 7 weeks Radiotherapy all together to give same chance of cure. Have you been offered this ?
I can't advise as the others have said. In my case surgery didn't work , but then again Bracchy wouldn't have either. It's very hard to make a choice. Get all the facts and don't leave it too long like I did !! When your choice is made then you have to ride with it

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 18:32

Thank you all so much for comments to help me through this particular phase of all this, and I am fully aware that many of you have this far worse than me. I hope I can offer help to others if needed.
My forthcoming decision has not been made easier just now by hearing from my brother who had RP 5 weeks ago having to call the ambulance worried that he had just had DVT. It wasn't, but this is a worry of surgery of course.

Sincere thanks.

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 18:42

My OH is having HD Brachy followed by 26 sessions of HT, one consultant bravely announced he was going for ' a cure' the other was much more grounded. We are both in our 60's, healthy, happy and lots to do. lets hope he get the best outcome he can.The Brachy is on 18th April... This week we are moving the music studio, and gardening.anything to stop us ' mithering' ;-) 

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 21:58

Hi, David.
Go for HIFU to minimise side effects. You can have radiotherapy later if it proves necessary.
Good luck with whatever you decide.
Henry

User
Posted 11 Apr 2016 at 23:20

Assuming you are under a specialist hospital or have been offered a clinical trial if HIFU is still on the table, David? I imagine you are already aware but the data on HIFU as a salvage treatment is much more positive than as a primary treatment and the only decent-sized piece of research on salvage RT after failed HIFU was fairly negative in relation to side effects.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 03:02

Hi David,

Unless I have missed something, I can't see that you have said that you have actually seen a HIFU surgeon, only that your Brachy consultant has suggested that if you go the HIFU route make sure the surgeon is well experienced. It might help if you could get your histology and scans to a HIFU specialist for an opinion on your suitability for this procedure but it could delay things (unless you go private), as a new scan and template biopsy are a possibility. Best results for HIFU are generally when the tumour is small, on one side and well contained. Brachy which is just another form of radiation is able to treat cancers that are a little further away but sometimes due to circumstances and limitations it is supplemented by External Beam RT.

I also wondered about the 40% chance of your cancer returning in 5 years if treated with Brachy. This might be a general average rather than a specific risk for you.

Barry
User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 09:32

Soren and Barry, thank you.

Yes, I think HIFU as a first step may not be right but I will learn tomorrow when we see a HIFU specialist. It is out of county at Harlow so I have been referred there by my county, on NHS, so they do have my scan info etc. I will listen to what they say and make it perfectly clear I don't want HIFU unless I am a good candidate for it. That will be my last piece of the puzzle. I need to look into the success rate for Brachy a bit more, as I agree 40% chance of it returning is not good, and probably not correct! If I worry a lot about it returning, then RP is probably what I will choose, as I am probably more optimistic that will get rid of it all. No guarantee but more likely. Then I'll have to deal with using one nerve...and aids!!

David W

User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 10:28

Good luck tomorrow, David.
I am sure the HIFU doctor won't offer it to you if you are not a good candidate, as there is no way they want you to have a bad outcome after their treatment.
At 3 weeks post-op with left nerve spared I am exploring aides, though nothing too strenuous yet! I am using a pump to get some expansion because I believe that is meant to help blood supply and so (or by other means) fend off the shrinkage/fibrosis of the penis that can be associated with having no erections for a while. That is not strictly using it as an aid. My surgeon also prescribes cialis 5 mg daily for the blood supply. Others use 20mg 2 or three times a week to try for more of and erection.
I have popped a ring on when using the pump a couple of times (on the base of my penis) just to see what it is like. It held the expansion, but as expected there is no sign of an erection.
A bit further into my recovery I will start using the Viberect we invested in (see their website) to see if that can produce something more like an erection, as opposed to vacuum-generated expansion. Again - partly therapeutically to stave off shrinkage, but also hopefully as an aide to sex.
So far the effect of surgery on sex is the hardest thing for my partner and I. We are going to have to take our time to get our heads around the change to our sex life (as well as hoping it returns, though that is minimum 2 months and up to 2 years, as I understand it). One deterrent to having sex is that touching my penis is one cause of leaks still.
I am finding that I want to be confident with the use of aides, etc. before helping my partner get used to us using them.
I am still glad I chose surgery over radiotherapy, though, because with the radiotherapy side-effects can accrue over some time because of the effect over time on organs caused by their blood supply being fried by the radiotherapy. With the surgery the side effects should improve over time. Of course I might not be lucky enough to get away with treatment ending with the surgery ...
All the best,
Henry

User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 12:22
Hello. Where did you get the 40% chance of it returning from? Our consultant at Addenbrookes didn't say that. As far as I know there is only the one chap at Addenbrookes that does it. We either see him or a chap under him. He said if psa remains as low as it is now after 2 and half years then 90% chance of it remaining that way and not returning. Though the online statistics I read said 30% chance of it returning whichever treatment you do. My other half was 57 when he had it. So similar age to you. Not sure why it was higher than we were told. Good luck whichever way you go.
User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 16:06

Hi Lyn

 

I spoke to the Brachy consultant's assistant again just now to clarify the percentage chance of success. He did say that in MY case recurrence within the magic 5 years is between 20-40% likely. That's a success chance of 60-80% of course. The lower end is not impressive, but I guess HIFU could sort that out, IF it comes back, and IF it stays within.  This figure comes from my stats of 3+4 and PSA 13 even though it's on one side only, and contained. This is why it's possibly as low as 60% success chance...which doesn't help me!

User
Posted 12 Apr 2016 at 18:11

Hi David,

The problem of comparing treatment success is made difficult because results are often assessed many years later than the treatment was given and new forms of treatment are developed (Nanoknife IRE not generally available in the UK for example). In the interim, improvements have been made in equipment and techniques for existing methods which can improve success rates and or reduce some side effects, so all treatments have moved on one way or another.

One of the problems with HIFU is the possibility of a stricture but this is now more rare. Another area is urinary blockage. It follows that the more tumour that is burnt away the more debris there is to be expelled.

The best known systems for giving HIFU are the French Ablatherm and the American Sonablate. Each is claimed to have advantages over the other but the man regarded as top in the UK for HIFU for uses the latter.

Whichever treatment you opt for, I hope it is successful. Do keep us posted.

Barry
User
Posted 13 Apr 2016 at 13:45

Hi All,

Back from my HIFU consultation at St Margaret's, part of Harlow trust. 90 minutes late for everyone but nevermind! Long way there too.
So, he was straight into assuming this is what I want, as I had been referred out of county. He said that with what is known so far, I am suitable. But he said a plate Biopsy is needed and to book it in for a week Monday. We said we would have to think about it after we had finished discussions with him today, but in fact I agreed later on. I knew this might be needed but I guess was hoping my MRI and normal biopsy might have been enough, especially as the Plate one needs a General, and a Catheter for a day or two...and it's only about 6 weeks since my other Biopsy!

Anyway, the point is that it will give a much better picture and, as he said, even if it means I don't then do HIFU due to too much cancer being found, it will show that Brachy is needed instead(or surgery of course). Currently cancer in one side only. So I guess I could still go for Brachy or Surgery after this Biopsy....with HIFU in reserve if Brachy fails?

Driving down there, with my wife, I was in a bit of turmoil...what to choose etc. Naturally, after today, surgery seems less appealing again, even though it may be the chicken in me rather than doing the SLIGHTLY better thing long-term. One just does not know. Yesterday I was 'on' for surgery!

So today, right now, I'm more minded to do the Brachy, with HIFU later if it returns (that 60-80% chance!!)...or the magic pill that they will have developed by then!

All thoughts on the Plate biopsy in terms of either how it is, or how good it is to have it done, most welcome.

Cheers,

David

[Age 56, Gleason 3+4, an 8mm tumour found in one side, possible other bits on same side. No symptoms at all.]

User
Posted 13 Apr 2016 at 13:47

Oh and I forgot to say I just got a call from the Lister in Stevenage where I had also asked to be referred, out of County, as I heard this surgeon is rather good. It's just to get a different view from another surgeon form another Trust. Jim A is his name!

That's on Friday, then I'm done with seeing folks!

David W

User
Posted 13 Apr 2016 at 14:34

Thanks for the update.
Take your time choosing what you want. You will arrive at a point where your preference stops changing!
Best of luck with Friday's consultation and Monday week's biopsy.

Henry

User
Posted 13 Apr 2016 at 16:02
Hi David,

I had the template biopsy under general anaesthetic . No real issues at all, in and out of hospital in a few hours as a day patient, a catheter wasn't mentioned or needed, just needed to pee a couple of times before they let me home. Had some bruising and discomfort particularly when sitting but nothing that a couple of nurofen couldn't fix . Some blood in urine and semen.

Cheers

AL

User
Posted 13 Apr 2016 at 22:52

David

Your situation is very similar to what mine was (although I was 59 when diagnosed). I went for the Happy Trial (http://www.prostatebrachytherapy.org.uk/abstracts/2015_ProstateBrachytherapyMeeting_A4_Abstracts.pdf) . Is only suitable for those with cancer confined to one side of the prostate.

I have absolutely no regrets after having treatment in May 2015. Contact the prostate cancer centre at Guildford (Royal Surrey) if you're interested. I travelled from Devon to Guildford for the treatment but rate my care as excellent.

dl

User
Posted 14 Apr 2016 at 10:52

Thanks dl!

No-one on here has mentioned 'Nervesave' where they remove the prostate, slice it up, freeze it, and do 'live' pathology DURING the RP, to check safety margins, to then see if it is ok to nerve-save. Maybe someone has mentioned this somewhere! Anyway, my final 'new' meeting with anyone is with Mr J.A. at Lister who does this type of RP. To be honest, if this looks like a way forward, I may well forget the HIFU route and take the RP plunge. This is the closest to a decision yet...maybe...it may change again yet! I'll let you know what he says tomorrow, after another journey out of County...

Thanks all,

David

Edited by member 14 Apr 2016 at 11:28  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 14 Apr 2016 at 11:58

Not sure about other hospitals but they did this during John's op 6 years ago - that was how they knew to take away some of the bottom of his bladder. Mr P told us that it is down to the experience of the surgeon and whether or not he is confident of what his eyes and fingers (with open surgery) are telling him - if unsure, instant pathology can be used. The downside is that you are knocked out for longer and generally speaking, anaesthetists want their patients under GA for as short a time as possible.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 14 Apr 2016 at 13:20
Hi David,

I sent you a private message the other day... not sure if you have seen it?

User
Posted 14 Apr 2016 at 13:35

my OH had a template biopsy in Feb (46 cores). The catheter was removed before he came round from op. He was allowed home once he could pee and had to have someone with him for 24 hours (becasue of the general). He had ciprofloxacin and tamsulosin after op. Lots of bruising of scrotum and, unusually, developed a prostate infection that is proving hard to shift. His recovery apart from that was quite quick. Sitting was a bit uncomfortable. The template biopsy provides much more info than the TRUS because the entire gland can be sampled. No more blood in urine/semen than with TRUS
Hope all goes well with the biopsy and with surgery later if that's what you opt for
B

User
Posted 14 Apr 2016 at 20:30

Another advantage of the Transperineal template is that there is a lower risk of infection than with the Trus biopsy. However, even though I also recovered very quickly after the former procedure, the medical staff insisted I should not drive for 24 hours and I understand this is the usual recommendation.

Barry
User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 13:36

Hello everyone.

Well. Today I have made my decision, and it has not been an easy one. I have just returned from the final planned Consultation. This time it was at the Lister, Stevanage, also out of county for me. I only got called on Wednesday (I had been waiting) after we got back from Epping for the HIFU consultation. I was also booked in for pre-biopsy med next week, and Template Biopsy the week after, needed for HIFU.

I had decided that if this new Biopsy was going to be no help for RP, then I would not have it, and depending on what Mr A [name removed by Moderator] said today, I would make my decision. He was the first of the 5 Consultants to actually have my MRI on screen 'live' to move around. My own County couldn't manage that. He showed the tumour on my one side was fairly large and possibly a bit close to the capsule edge. This guy does the Neurosave pathology during the surgery - or rather his pathologist does, whilst he carries on taking out my lympth nodes and sows the bladder back on. So both sides will be analysed, and he will then decide whether both nerves can be saved...or probably just the one. He did say though that even with one nerve, erections have a 50% chance, and that's based on all ages, not a fit spring-chicken 56 year old like me!!!

So yes - as you can guess I have rejected HIFU and Brachy. Today he said that HIFU really was not suitable at my age for what I've got, plus the PSA is 13 etc etc. He came across very well. He is rather popular so I have to wait 8 weeks...currently booked for June 21st. He says the wait won't matter, though he has said I should get a bone scan. It 'will be clear' he said, but due to the PSA, it should be done.

So there we are. RP it is. Flippin' 'eck....what a decision.

I have to thank you all for correspondence over the last few weeks. I just hope I have made the right choice. Actually, this was what I thought I would have to choose right at the start. I just had to explore all options.

Cheers everyone for now.

Edited by moderator 15 Apr 2016 at 19:10  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 14:41

Hi David,

Glad you have now made your decision. I have no regrets (so far) on going down the RP route but it is early days for me (coming up to 4 weeks since operation).

Keep thinking positive... and good luck with your treatment..

User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 14:56

Good for you!
Your situation is very similar to mine (4+3, big, peripheral lump making HIFU not right. I am 50 and in good health, generally).
I am day 22 post-op. The leaking is improving, but still there, particularly if I move. No erections, but surgeon said my nerves were spared so hopefully they will return sooner rather than later.
Have you found out about penile rehab? I believe you just will have ED because the nerves are 'stunned' even if they are spared, and take a minimum of some weeks to recover. They will want you to be getting erections about 3 times a week, one way or another, to prevent the fibrosis that seems to result from the limited blood supply associated with being flaccid all the time. So if viagra-like tablets don't give you erections (and they need the nerve to be working) it is usually injections for a while. I have an appointment next week with the nurse who looks after erections in our service! I think she will be getting me to inject ... you can use the time after the operation to get your head around that if you haven't already.

I feel as if I am making progress and I plan to go back to work in 10 days. I sit most of the time at work, which for me involves next to no leaking.

Good luck!

Henry

User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 16:12

Thanks Henry. Sounds like you have done well. I still may only get one nerve but I believe that's not so bad. I have heard about working on ED sooner rather than later so trust me - I will get onto that!! How long did things 'hurt' post-op? I mean general aches, stomach area etc? And did you start getting to stroll around pretty quickly?

Thanks

David

PS I've been doing pelvics for 8 weeks now - just in case! Havent missed any yet....

User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 18:19

David - good news that you are clear in your mind now but naming medics is against the rules so perhaps best to edit your post :-(

Henry, don't be disappointed if they make you go through 6 or 9 months of alternatives before they give in and prescribe injections ... particularly as there is a national shortage of caverject at the moment so even with a px you might not be able to get it :-(

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 15 Apr 2016 at 18:46

Hi David
Making your mind up is more than half the problem. Well done and you can move forward from here. I just wish you the best with erectile recovery. It's a long haul and only the very lucky few get rapid improvement.
Henry , Lyn is right about Caverject supply being awkward and I am now on Viridal with no supply issues at all. And I think it is better even though it is a generic form of Alprostadil. Even though I am 48 and supposedly had double nerve spare , my surgeon said at 8 weeks that tablets would NOT work for me , and happily put me immediately on injection therapy. It works to an extent. For what it's worth I still feel my surgeon may have been having a very off day , or handed over to a registrar whilst he got a coffee. Spread wasn't known , but bits left behind ( positive margins ) and endless pain since the op with " adhesions " in my bladder area , and not a flutter down below. All a bit depressing :-(

 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK