I was discharged back to the care of my GP last March which I was fine with. The oncologist suggested I return to 6 monthly tests.
Anyway I saw the GP last week as he wrote to me asking to make an appointment to review my PCa. Interestingly when I got there it was a standard letter. So he just read the oncologist letter and said your PSA is normal (he said that when it was 22). I agreed that for someone who has had radical treatment it was a reasonable PSA ie 0.03. I pointed out though that even though they are very low numbers they had creeped up from my nadir of 0.01 and perhaps that’s why I was back on 6 monthly tests. He then said no you are annual. I pointed out that the oncologist had told me 6 monthly. However, the letter said annual.
The GP was very resistant to my suggestion of having a 6 monthly test as the oncologist letter said annual. I eventually persuaded him that waiting until October seemed unreasonable when there have been changes in my PSA level but he was clearly not happy. I almost told him if I hadn’t researched and accepted his opinion in 2012 that I would possibly be dead now but I refrained as he is usually very approachable.
I think this highlighted for me the difference between staying under the oncologist rather being discharged back to the GP for a condition that he admits he is no expert in
Bri