Thank you for the responses. I have been looking on the Internet about prostate cancer ever since I got my blood test results showing my PSA of 38.3.
The one thing that stands out to me above all else is the emphasis that no system of diagnosis for prostate cancer is accurate, it’s all a bit “may be”, “could be”
That said I consider myself very lucky not to have been subjected to a TRUS biopsy, as that system of diagnosis seems to have been traumatic to the recipients and likely to cause infection by virtue of its method and is very hit and miss.
My transperineal template biopsy on the other hand was carried out under general anaesthetic with MRI and Ultrasound data available to the consultant and was completely stress and pain free with none of the increased risk of sepsis involved with TRUS.
On removal of my dressing this morning my dear wife counted 25 biopsy punctures, 16 on the side where my lesion is and nine on the other side.
I was interested to read the comment that my PSA reading of 38.3 would not be that high purely as a result of the amount of cycling that I do. I don’t know if there is any clinical data to back up the statement but hopefully that will become available in the future.
Prostate cancer is very topical on the news channels at the moment and there was much comment about a fast tracking system but the most promising thing I have seen is the development of a fast new generation MRI scanner in Scotland.
As my son approaches 40 I will be urging him to get checked sooner rather than later