Never understood why the risk of side effects of surgery seem to be considered as worse/higher than other methods.
Possibly because the twin spectres of incontinence and ED loom large. While they are real, in the hands of a good, well-practised surgeon, the odds of a near full recovery ( certainly for continence) are very good. Also, it’s not as though the other methods are free of unpleasant side effects either, with incontinence and ED among them.
If you have a normal sized prostate then small-seed brachytherapy may be worth looking into as well.
However, for me, belonging to the “only good carcinoma is the one in the bucket” school of thought, getting it out while it was considered to be confined to the prostate was the way to go.
Wish you all the best in your decision making process.
Nick