I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Help with next steps...

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 13:18

Hi all .. I am 49 and just been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer (psa 8.0, gleason9, t2c/t3a). Feeling really blown away, at this point I could really do with some advice on how to proceed from some of you people who have had to go through this.

I have always been healthy, never had to step foot in a hospital before. Weight normal, BP normal, etc. Only issue I have had healthwise is in the last 6-7 years going to pee has become increasingly difficult despite doctor saying prostate was normal size just probably a 'funny' shape. I never thought to check for cancer until my GP called me in for a regular blood test inc. a PSA test.

So the PSA reading came back as 8.0, I had an MRI done and at first they sent me home saying it was just a weird reading. Then got a call back a week or two later (after their MDT) recommending a biopsy, to which I reluctantly agreed. Another two weeks and went in for the results, to be told I had tumours in both the sides of the rear section of my prostate, right side gleason 6 and left side gleason of 9 (I think 5+4 but a little hazy). The 'naughty' tumor, as the consultant put it, is about 8mm wide and I am either a T2c or a T3a. The doctor also mentioned it could be a low PSA producing cancer because my PSA reading was quite low for what the biopsy had found. He couldn't tell me exactly how long it had been there (maybe years he said) or why it happened. There is no history of cancer in my family, he just said matter of factly it looked like I drew the short straw. 

He sent me off for a full bone scan the following week, with results the following day. I almost passed out going into the doctors office the next day for the results, but they said they found no evidence that it had spread. 

They have started me on hormone tablets (50mg bicalutamide) while I wait for a robotic prostatectomy which they will then follow up with radiotherapy (they call it a multi-modal approach). Its been 10 days and I should be getting a date today, the suspense is killing me. But the NHS is so difficult to get through to, its like a machine, and I am worried if I have to wait a long time for the operation it could spread, especially as the gleason 9 tumour looks on the scan to be getting pretty close or on the edge of the prostate. Basically I just want it out ASAP. The doctor and nurse say the hormone tablets will stop it in its tracks, but I am not so sure that is always the case. I can afford to go private for the op if it speeds things up do you think a few weeks could make the difference? The NHS surgeon seems to be a top guy though and has done many of these procedures with good results. He said he planned to cure me, but with a gleason 9 is that realistic or just soothing words?

It may be too late but I have made lifestyle changes, I have dropped the ecig I was using, changed my diet to eat all those things that may help with this. Taking supplements (curcumin, modified citrus pectin). Sleeping a proper 8 hours and taking long walks. Maybe the horse has already bolted but willing to try anything if it might help. I have 2 young kids that depend on me, and can't bear the thought of having to leave them early.

 

Thanks for reading

Chris.

 

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 14:03
The hormone therapy will stop it in its tracks for now.

They are treating you very aggressively with Surgery, RT and hormones, so you are certainly getting the best shot at a complete remission.

Private v NHS that's s bit trickier. Wouldn't consider private unless it's in the same top class NHS hospital and you are sure of the backup services.

Have you considered RT or RT + Bracy instead of surgery??

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 14:30

I too would question why put you through surgery if you're going to have radiotherapy anyway. That gives you both sets of side effects.

50mg bicalutamide is a low dose to prevent an initial testosterone flare when starting an LHRH agonist hormone treatment such as Zoladex, which you would normally do halfway through a 3 or 4 week course of 50mg bicalutamide. If they keep you on just 50mg bicalutamide for longer, ask for another PSA test to make sure it's bringing your PSA down. The hormone treatment dose of bicalutamide is normally 150mg, if they decide to use that as the main hormone treatment.

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 21:37

NHS used to disallow private patients access to any NHS services for any given treatment episode. This dissuaded patients from having any part of their care privately, adding to NHS costs and waiting lists, and losing out on private revenue which most NHS hospitals also collect.

This was completely changed sometime around 2014, and the NHS now has to allow patients to chose to have any parts of their diagnosis and treatment privately without compromising the care the NHS gives. NHS must share relevant records/diagnosis/test results with private providers if the patient chooses a mixed path (and expects private providers to share their records too for patients returning to the NHS from private care).

There are quite strict rules for consultants in that they mustn't provide or promote private treatment during NHS sessions, except that they can answer questions about private treatment options if the patient asks. (I can't recall if they are allowed to mention private treatment for something the NHS doesn't offer.)

There are also rules about prescribing drugs from private sessions which the GP practice is expected to pick up on repeat prescriptions. Can't remember details, but I think the GP is expected to refuse if it couldn't be provided on the NHS.

I don't know if all areas correctly implement this now - I read it in a leaflet in a waiting area, whilst waiting for an appointment. People comparing treatments before and after 2014 are likely to have completely different experiences regarding mixing private and NHS care.

EDIT: I may have misremembered the date this came into force. The following NHS document covers the rules on split treatment, which came into force (in theory) in 2009.
Guidance on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care

Edited by member 31 May 2019 at 22:04  | Reason: Add link to external document.

User
Posted 01 Jun 2019 at 12:17
Although one of the single or combined forms of RT can lead to remission, it is possible that years later this treatment will allow cancer regrowth - happened to me. It is more usual for young men to have surgery as they statistically have a longer life expectation than older men. Surgery + RT is like belt and braces and stands a better but not guaranteed chance of success than only one form of treatment, albeit with greater potential for adverse side effects. RT can easily be given after surgery but few surgeons will do it the other way round due to operating after the damage RT causes to the Prostate making what is an intricate operation on the Prostate without radiation a much more difficult one after RT. For men with high Gleason and where the cancer is believed to be near the edge of the Prostate, combining RP with RT is becoming more frequent, often with the addition of HT for anything up to 3 years after the RT.

I suggest you download or obtain a free copy of the 'Toolkit' from the publications section of this site. It provides a lot of general information about PCa and specific information on various treatments.

Barry
Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 14:03
The hormone therapy will stop it in its tracks for now.

They are treating you very aggressively with Surgery, RT and hormones, so you are certainly getting the best shot at a complete remission.

Private v NHS that's s bit trickier. Wouldn't consider private unless it's in the same top class NHS hospital and you are sure of the backup services.

Have you considered RT or RT + Bracy instead of surgery??

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 14:30

I too would question why put you through surgery if you're going to have radiotherapy anyway. That gives you both sets of side effects.

50mg bicalutamide is a low dose to prevent an initial testosterone flare when starting an LHRH agonist hormone treatment such as Zoladex, which you would normally do halfway through a 3 or 4 week course of 50mg bicalutamide. If they keep you on just 50mg bicalutamide for longer, ask for another PSA test to make sure it's bringing your PSA down. The hormone treatment dose of bicalutamide is normally 150mg, if they decide to use that as the main hormone treatment.

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 14:50

I think I am set on the surgery as it seems to give the best possible outcomes. I think I read that RP is more effective than bracy, and with a gleason 9 I am in no mood to mess about and will just have to roll the dice when it comes to future erections. I will ask them about why the RT on top, I haven't got much beyond the whole surgery thing at the moment. 

About the HT, they mentioned moving me onto a 6 weekly HT injection after the surgery, which I guess would be the full dose HT? Not getting much in the way of side effects after 10 days on the 50mg bicalutamide, apart from feeling dog tired around about 6pm. Does the 50mg slow progression down like they say? My main concern right now is to get the cancer out before it spreads, and if throwing money at it might help then I would do that. My NHS surgeon seems to be pretty good, he is the head guy there, so maybe waiting a few extra weeks for someone with a good track record is better than rushing through with the soonest available private surgeon?

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 15:06

THINK QUICKLY AND CAREFULLY!

At age 53, I was diagnosed with very similar results, Gleason 9, PSA 11+.
Also like you, Bicalutamide, Robotic Prostate removal and follow-up Radiotherapy.
Also healthy, slim, normal blood pressure. Mr. Average.

2.5 years later, I have come off the Bicalutamide. (End of February).
I go for my latest PSA results on Monday. That's when I find out how "cured" I am

Start pelvic floor exercises NOW, these help to some degree. I have still been left incontinent and use 1 Tena level 2 pad per day.

Diet: After the radiotherapy, I have regular anal bleeding. This has been helped the last 3-4 months by eating about 10 prunes per day. Soft stools have suddenly become very important in my life.

My man boobs (Bicalutamide) which disgust me have become much less tender. In fact, giving them a tweak just now, I would say pain-free.

Look into the sexual health advice on here.I had no advice prior to surgery and my last erection was December 8th 2016, the day before surgery.

From what I've seen on this site, I seem to have had a less than ideal outcome.
Many people seem to be overjoyed with "back to normal" results.
As suggested by francij1 have you considered alternatives.

I just went blindly down the route suggested at the time in a bit of a panicked, rushed daze.
Think very carefully how your life MAY be impacted if your results are similar to mine.
I'm struggling to come to terms with the impact on my life.

"But you're still alive" seems to be the first thing people say to me.
Yes, I exist.

Truly, I do hope whatever choice you make will have a great outcome.

Edited by member 31 May 2019 at 15:09  | Reason: Dates

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 15:14

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

 I will ask them about why the RT on top, I haven't got much beyond the whole surgery thing at the moment. 

 

My understanding...... My prostate was like a dye-soaked sponge. Where it rests on the prostate bed, some cancer cells can leach out into surrounding tissues. My radiotherapy was to the prostate bed and several remaining, nearby  lymph nodes.

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 17:20

8mm isn't that big, mine was 13 and someone else on here 15 and up to 20 is regarded as not excessive.   The Gleason is high and it's on both sides.   Mine was on one side so might have been big relative to that side.

Having an op and radiotherapy is very good treatment for sweeping up the area around the prostate for a high Gleason.  It won't be easy but results are good and they're looking to give you a better chance of longer term remission.   

I'd wait till you get the op date before deciding on whether to go private, especially for the radiotherapy which can be expensive.   You don't want to be having to ring back, it's all delay.  So you might decide to get some indications of private timescales before you get the NHS date.   

The NHS can get a bit snooty about people who've had private care and there are 10 years of after care including post radiotherapy hormones.  Private patients can get worse after care.  In my opinion, unless you go to a big private hospital, the NHS hospitals will usually provide better care and assurance. 

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 17:54
I would second Peter's comments. It is easy to imagine the cancer pushing at the edge and trying to escape as you sit there but prostate cancer isn't like that - a few weeks' delay in operating isn't going to do any harm and in many cases, is very sensible as it gives you time to prepare, get as healthy as possible, work on your pelvic floor and even get a holiday / some normality while you still can.

If you did want to explore going private, it might be worth asking your urologist's secretary whether s/he does private work and whether it would actually be any quicker. My husband went private but not due to speediness, simply that he wanted the surgeon who was already looking after my dad, father-in-law and mother-in-law ... it is good to keep it in the family 😂

What we didn't realise was that going out of the NHS meant we had no access to a clinical nurse specialist or any district nursing care, no right to incontinence products and it was a huge battle to get back into the NHS for referral to the ED clinic. As self-funders, we pay about £300 per consultation (4 per year), £75 for each PSA test, I think the op was about £8000 with hospital inpatient service, food, physio, anaesthetist charges, etc and I can't remember how much the last scan was. John was fortunate that they allowed him to have his RT on the NHS but we still pay to see the oncologist. It all adds up to a lot of money over the last 9 years and we will continue to pay for as long as J is around.

When Dad had his RP 20 years ago, it cost him about £18,000 because it was still experimental. He still sees the surgeon privately but only once a year if he can help it. Dad has never had any support from the CNS. It is a postcode lottery though; some members here have been able to have the op privately and have then had great support from their district nurses, etc so if you are seriously considering it, ask how the after care works in your Trust.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 18:00

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
The NHS surgeon seems to be a top guy though and has done many of these procedures with good results. He said he planned to cure me, but with a gleason 9 is that realistic or just soothing words?

 

Worth noting that there is no such thing as a cure for cancer, and you will rarely come across an oncologist talking about cures. What we all dream of is full remission ... and if not that then at the very least, that recurrence doesn't happen until many years later. 

NHS consultants tend not to bother with soothing words; they have an obligation to tell the truth and I would say sometimes they take that a bit too far. In all honesty, if he didn't think that there was any chance of remission he wouldn't be offering you these treatments; it would be an immoral waste of NHS resources. So in the midst of getting sh1t news that you have cancer, you might feel relief that they do at least believe you are worth treating. 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 20:36
As you say, Lyn, the way that private patients get treated by the NHS is very much a postcode lottery. At the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre on the Wirral, where I had my RT privately, private patients get access to exactly the same support services as NHS patients. I wonder if that's perhaps because it's a private clinic in an NHS hospital?

I've had all my PSA tests done at my GP's surgery with zero hassle (and zero cost), and now my private medical insurance is about to end due to my forthcoming retirement, transferring to NHS follow-up care involved nothing more than my consultant asking his secretary to move me from his private to his NHS list. It really couldn't have been easier.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 May 2019 at 21:37

NHS used to disallow private patients access to any NHS services for any given treatment episode. This dissuaded patients from having any part of their care privately, adding to NHS costs and waiting lists, and losing out on private revenue which most NHS hospitals also collect.

This was completely changed sometime around 2014, and the NHS now has to allow patients to chose to have any parts of their diagnosis and treatment privately without compromising the care the NHS gives. NHS must share relevant records/diagnosis/test results with private providers if the patient chooses a mixed path (and expects private providers to share their records too for patients returning to the NHS from private care).

There are quite strict rules for consultants in that they mustn't provide or promote private treatment during NHS sessions, except that they can answer questions about private treatment options if the patient asks. (I can't recall if they are allowed to mention private treatment for something the NHS doesn't offer.)

There are also rules about prescribing drugs from private sessions which the GP practice is expected to pick up on repeat prescriptions. Can't remember details, but I think the GP is expected to refuse if it couldn't be provided on the NHS.

I don't know if all areas correctly implement this now - I read it in a leaflet in a waiting area, whilst waiting for an appointment. People comparing treatments before and after 2014 are likely to have completely different experiences regarding mixing private and NHS care.

EDIT: I may have misremembered the date this came into force. The following NHS document covers the rules on split treatment, which came into force (in theory) in 2009.
Guidance on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care

Edited by member 31 May 2019 at 22:04  | Reason: Add link to external document.

User
Posted 01 Jun 2019 at 00:25

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

I think I am set on the surgery as it seems to give the best possible outcomes. I think I read that RP is more effective than bracy, and with a gleason 9 I am in no mood to mess about and will just have to roll the dice when it comes to future erections. I will ask them about why the RT on top, I haven't got much beyond the whole surgery thing at the moment.

It's not that simple. Surgery (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) broadly have similar outcomes, but there are situations which make one better than the other, and you might factor in the different side effects too as some may be of more concern than others to you individually.

RP tends to be good for patients able to handle surgery, and for cancers which are contained (T2). If the cancer in the prostate is located away from the rear and lower prostate capsule surfaces, nerve sparing is likely to be possible, enabling recovery of erections, at least to some extent in most cases. RP is not likely to work if the cancer is right up to or past the prostate capsule (T3), as it won't remove the cancer which has likely escaped into the prostate bed (T3a) or seminal vesicles (T3b).

RT on the other hand treats both the prostate and the area around the prostate, and is thus better for T3 staged cancers. It's also more suitable for patients less able to tolerate significant surgery (i.e. more relevant as you get older). It is less likely to impact erections immediately, but can do so many years later. It can also cause bowel problems, almost always after treatment for a couple of weeks, but can do later too, and less commonly, bladder problems. It increases the chances of other cancers decades ahead, which is is something to consider if you're younger (as you are).

Having both RP and RT means you get both sets of side effects. I would ask why that's being recommended, rather than just RT (maybe two types, External Beam RT (EBRT), and Brachytherapy). That way, you get just the RT side effects. If they think there's a good chance it's a T3, they will require you to have at least RT, because RP alone won't give you significant remission if it's T3.

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

About the HT, they mentioned moving me onto a 6 weekly HT injection after the surgery, which I guess would be the full dose HT? Not getting much in the way of side effects after 10 days on the 50mg bicalutamide, apart from feeling dog tired around about 6pm. Does the 50mg slow progression down like they say? My main concern right now is to get the cancer out before it spreads, and if throwing money at it might help then I would do that.

OK, so you are taking the 50mg bicalutamide to prevent a flare when you start an LHRH agonist hormone treatment such as Zoladex, and maybe to give some slowing as the Zoladex is being delayed until after RP. Zoladex injections are 12 weekly (although the first one might be a 4 week dose), or Prostap is 3 monthly.

10 days is too soon to see most of the HT side effects. I created a list of HT side effects which hit me, and ones which haven't hit me (at least, yet), which you might find interesting.
https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t21321-Hormone-treatment-lack-of-support-from-NHS#post216465
Everyone is different and will get different of the possible side effects, and after different periods of time, but it might give you an idea. In my view, it is well worth knowing what the side effects are, because some can be worked around. Some of these won't happen on the 50mg bicalutamide dose (ask me if you want details), only when you move to Zoladex. Here's a more generic list of HT side effects with more description of each one and workarounds:
https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t21321-Hormone-treatment-lack-of-support-from-NHS#post216433

The 50mg bicalutamide will at least slow the prostate cancer, but it's really so you can start the injections, which should stop it, at least for some time. HT makes the RT much more effective, which is actually the main reason it's given, usually for 3-6 months before RT and 18-36 months afterwards. Prostate cancer mostly grows slowly anyway, and even a month or so waiting for RP without any HT (for those having just RP) is quite normal and not of any concern.

Exercise is something else you should look at. There's now plenty of evidence that it slows progression of prostate cancer, and reduces many of the side effects of HT. You probably won't be able to exercise for a while after RP though.

Edited by member 01 Jun 2019 at 09:57  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 01 Jun 2019 at 11:28

Remission means that the signs and symptoms of your cancer are reduced. Remission can be partial or complete. In a complete remission, all signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared. If you remain in complete remission for 5 years or more, some doctors may say that you are cured.” Cancer Institute


These days, doctors are able to cure many cancers. But some cancers can come back many years after treatment. So you may find that your doctor is very unwilling to use the word 'cure', even though there is no sign that you have any cancer left. Doctors usually say that your cancer is in remission. This means that there is no sign of cancer in your body. If there are any cancer cells left:
- there are too few to find
- there are too few to cause any symptoms
- they are in an inactive state and are not growing
” Cancer Research UK


“Although you’ve had treatment aimed at getting rid of your prostate cancer, your doctor or nurse won’t usually use the word ‘cure’. Instead they may say you’re ‘in remission’. This means there is no sign of cancer. Unfortunately, your doctor or nurse can’t tell you whether your cancer will come back.” PCUK website

As I said, some doctors use the word ‘cure’ but the technically correct term is remission. In the case of prostate cancer, full remission is considered to be 10 years clear; my dad received a letter 10 years post-op telling him that he was in full remission although he had a recurrence 3 years later.

Edited by member 01 Jun 2019 at 11:29  | Reason: Not specified

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 01 Jun 2019 at 12:17
Although one of the single or combined forms of RT can lead to remission, it is possible that years later this treatment will allow cancer regrowth - happened to me. It is more usual for young men to have surgery as they statistically have a longer life expectation than older men. Surgery + RT is like belt and braces and stands a better but not guaranteed chance of success than only one form of treatment, albeit with greater potential for adverse side effects. RT can easily be given after surgery but few surgeons will do it the other way round due to operating after the damage RT causes to the Prostate making what is an intricate operation on the Prostate without radiation a much more difficult one after RT. For men with high Gleason and where the cancer is believed to be near the edge of the Prostate, combining RP with RT is becoming more frequent, often with the addition of HT for anything up to 3 years after the RT.

I suggest you download or obtain a free copy of the 'Toolkit' from the publications section of this site. It provides a lot of general information about PCa and specific information on various treatments.

Barry
User
Posted 01 Jun 2019 at 16:03

Hi Chris,

Have you sought a second opinion from an oncologist? I would, rather than rush straight into surgery.

Two friends, like me, have had a prostatectomy within the last year (amazing how they come out of the woodwork when you tell them you have prostate cancer: ‘Me too!’. They both had the best surgeons that money can buy privately, yet they both have suffered recurrence and I am the only one still clear. They now have years of HT and about a month’s worth of being on the wrong end of a ray-gun to look forward to. I wonder if they regret their decisions now, but they took advice from the best professionals.

Privately, the cost of a robotic prostatectomy is about twenty grand, but one man here was supposed to get a fifteen grand rebate off the NHS - no idea why. I must make contact and see if the NHS actually paid out.

One oncologist told me I was cured after my operation, to which my parting shot to him was: ‘See you again...’

Best of luck however it pans out.

Cheers, John.

Edited by member 01 Jun 2019 at 17:14  | Reason: Not specified

 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK