I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Understanding MRI Results

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 09:43

Wondered if anyone can give me advice / clarity on my MRI experience.

Background - BUPA Health screening detected 2.8 PSA earlier in year - GP repeated test and it came back at 3.2 and he referred me as my father had had prostate issue (not cancer) at my age (55). GP advised me to go via NHS rather than BUPA as it would be more joined-up.

Consultant said my father's prostate issue wasn't actually a risk factor, me DRE was fine and got the impression GP shouldn't really have referred me but he said we'd an MRI although he expected it to be clear. Didn't do loads or research as at this stage I was feeling it would all be OK.

MRI was MPMRI but didn't have a "tracer" injected or anything put in my rear-end which, upon subsequent research seems odd. They did put a heavy plate kind of thing over my stomach. So a bit of concern that I didn't get the best kind of MRI????

Didn't get MRI result fed back properly - just a call from hospital asking me to go in for a biopsy the following day (because they had a cancellation rather than because it was urgent) which I accepted as it would mean I got the results quicker but did mean I didn't have time to think through questions etc - but assumed I'd see consultant for biopsy and everything would be explained.

A doctor (not a consultant) and got the impression she specialised in the BIOPSY not the end to end treatment. She was surprised I hadn't had the results back previous her explanation didn't match subsequent reading. She said MRI had come back inconclusive - she hadn't been given a specific area to focus on - and she implied it was scored 1-6 with 1&2 being no follow-up, 5&6 a definite problem and 4 (which I was) the upper end of unclear.

So was wondering if anyone can through any light on what this all meant.

Frustrated as feel I should have researched a lot more especially as I had the option of going via work BUPA.

 

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 10:31

On the private front, I was also strongly advised by my GP to use the NHS for diagnosis. You get a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) discussing your case each time a test result comes through - a team of up to 30 experts in all areas - surgery, radiotherapy, oncology, radiologist, etc. As a private patient, you usually have one consultant, and can easily be swayed to their own speciality. Even as an NHS patient, you can pay for extra diagnostic procedures (such as some types of scan the NHS doesn't do), and the MDT will use those results. When you get the MDT's treatment recommendation(s), you might then decide to have treatment privately, if you want to. Do make it clear when you talk with consultants that you are prepared to have private treatment - they are not allowed to raise it with you, but you can raise it with them, and ask if there's some extra procedure that might make a difference.

mpMRI - there are different ways of doing this. Contrast dye (gadolinium) is one way, but can't be used on patients with reduced kidney function (border line may vary, but I heard eGFI must be above 45). Newer MRI scanners have other ways to generate the 'multi-parametric' images. The heavy plate thing is called a coil. MRI scanners have lots of coils in them to relay the signals that come out of the body. Sometimes, they want to add more nearer the patient than are built in to the machine. It might be that this was used to generate additional images to form your multi-parametric scan, or it might just have been to produce a better quality image.

Ultrasound up your rear end isn't normally done inside an MRI scanner. (I can't imagine an ultrasound probe could work in an MRI magnetic field.)

The 1-6 are PIRADS scores. They indicate the probability of what the radiologist found as being cancerous, but note that an MRI scanner alone cannot diagnose prostate cancer - it can only hint where biopsy samples should be taken. It would also indicate where in the prostate the questionable area is, and what sort of biopsy would be required to sample it. TRUS (Transrectal ultrasound) is a common outpatient biopsy procedure, but can't reach the front of the prostate, and generally only takes 12 samples. A transperenial template biopsy is a theatre procedure under general anaesthetic (usually) and can take 30-60 samples much more accurately. If you haven't had a biopsy yet, I would ask for the transperenial template biopsy, and you might consider doing that privately. The TRUS is just starting to be phased out in some hospitals in favour of a new transperineal (non-template) biopsy, done as an outpatient procedure. TRUS has a higher infection risk (3%), whereas the transperineal biopsies are around 0.1% infection risk.

You can request a copy of your medical records, reports, and scan images. I did this after each significant new diagnostic procedure, and I keep a copy of all my records, test results, etc. Hospitals now have to provide them for free, within 30 days of request.

Edited by member 10 Jul 2019 at 10:32  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 12:15
So long as you pick a consultant who works in the NHS you can get the best of both worlds ie MDT and NHS treatment but pay to see the consultant privately so you can have time to discuss everything with the "main man or woman" rather than 10 minutes with one of their "minions"
User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 13:14

francij1,

I don't think that mixture of NHS/Private would work as you describe. Private patients can't be discussed in the MDT, and NHS patients don't have a dedicated consultant. One of the consultants (usually urology, as urology run the MDT) will report back the MDT decisions/recommendations to you after the meeting, and discuss next steps. Having said that, I found it worked very well. I never felt rushed for time, and if I thought of something afterwards, I emailed the specialist nurse (Macmillan nurses where I am), and they went and got the answer for me. When I felt I needed more discussion with a consultant, I asked for that too, and the Macmillan nurses setup another consultant appointment within a few days (they set it after the next MDT, so I could be discussed again in the MDT beforehand).

The NHS is required to work with any appropriate private diagnosis and treatment a patient wants to have, and must share it's patient record to avoid tests having to be duplicated.

Clearly not all hospitals are the same. I have heard people on here being told they have cancer by a nurse rather than a consultant, but I'm pretty sure my hospital wouldn't do that (they have the nurse present who can take you aside after the appointment for a longer discussion).

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 13:30

hi.

see my profile. 're my brother.

you need pi rad analysis and then and only then consider biospy.   Assuming you are not having one.  Another psa test in 18 mths ?    

Regards Gordon 

 

 

 

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 15:20

So I think you will just have to await the outcome of the results of what I presume was a rectal TRUS biopsy. Two friends advised me against one of those as they both ended up having to have a transperineal biopsy subsequently as well. Buy one get one free!

If your number four figure is indeed Pirads 4, there is potential for concern, which the biopsy *should* resolve.

Best of luck.

Cheers, John.

Edited by member 10 Jul 2019 at 15:21  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 10 Jul 2019 at 22:29

hi 

ive just re read  and saw you have had a biopsy.   ok.

I probably would not have personally on the facts your posted.  ie would have wanted more discussion, another PSA test in 3 months and full explanation of PIRAD.

regards Gordon 

User
Posted 11 Jul 2019 at 08:04

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

francij1,

I don't think that mixture of NHS/Private would work as you describe. Private patients can't be discussed in the MDT, and NHS patients don't have a dedicated consultant. One of the consultants (usually urology, as urology run the MDT) will report back the MDT decisions/recommendations to you after the meeting, and discuss next steps. Having said that, I found it worked very well. I never felt rushed for time, and if I thought of something afterwards, I emailed the specialist nurse (Macmillan nurses where I am), and they went and got the answer for me. When I felt I needed more discussion with a consultant, I asked for that too, and the Macmillan nurses setup another consultant appointment within a few days (they set it after the next MDT, so I could be discussed again in the MDT beforehand).

Well it worked for me,  I was diagnosed privately (MPMRI and biopsy), referred to "the best surgeon" within 100 miles. He saw me privately answered all my concerns and treated me on the NHS. 

I know it was the NHS because I was self funding and the major delay in my treatment was for the MDT review of the treatment recomendation and of course the waiting list.

After my 1 year follow up my local health board (Wales) refused to finance further hospital visits and wanted my GP to do follow ups, because I have a residual usPSA I was unhappy with this and just switched back to private so I could continue to see the same team. This included a Oncologist review and a second opinion on my final pathology.

So it can be done. 

User
Posted 11 Jul 2019 at 13:31

Thanks for feedback which is really useful.

I've got a Biopsy results meeting next week.

This is with a nurse followed by an appointment with (I presume) a consultant over a week latter. 

I'm presuming the nurse will tell me whether they've found anything and if they have  exactly where, how many biopsy samples came back with it and  Gleeson scores etc and what the treatment options might be.

I'd presumed it was standard practice to get the results back from a nurse so you could emotionally adjust before you discussed what you might actually do with a consultant latter - but looks from posts as if that managed differently in different parts of the NHS.

Is there anything else I should be asking about at this stage either about the diagnosis or how my hospital handles the next stages of the process.

 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK