I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Which consultant first?

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 12:13

Was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer after biopsies, Gleeson 7{3+4}.


My consultant urologist has referred me to another I think who deals more with surgery, have an appointment for Tuesday coming but today have received another appointment for start of next year to see an oncologist. 


My question is, shouldn't I see the oncologist first to discus treatment options or would this other consultant urologist in Preston Royal where they have robotic surgery etc. 

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 12:46

Colin,


Sorry you find yourself a member of this exclusive group.


It's useful to put your diagnosis in your profile so people can check it before answering and tailor answers more specifically to your condition. Gleason is part of it, but also important is your PSA history with dates, staging (e.g. T3aN0M0, or something like that), PIRADS score from MRI scan, and any more detailed information about location of the cancer in the prostate.


It sounds like your MDT (multi-disciplinary team) has decided you are broadly suitable for either a radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT), and is sending you to consultants who deal with each so you can get detailed info from each, and use that to decide which way to go.

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 15:17
A surgeon will talk to you about the surgical option and, if suitable, active surveillance, while the oncologist will talk to you about radiotherapy, brachytherapy and other 'therapies' that a) are suitable and b) available to you
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 23:43

Hi Colin, I was operated on at Preston almost exactly 3 years ago.  Things have changed since I was there as they hadn't got a robot.  Also I chose surgery from the word go as I was told it was near the edge and wanted it cut out as soon as possible.


I saw the surgeon on the 6th Dec and he operated on the 16th which was pretty quick as he said it would be after Christmas at our meeting.  Although I did mention to him I was ready for the operation right away if he had a spare slot.


In theory I don't think it matters which way you see them as the oncologist could start you on hormones very quickly.  The only reservation I'd have is that if you favour surgery he might put off setting a date until you've seen the oncologist.  Whereas if you said right away you choose surgery he might give you an earlier date.


At the appointment you could ask the surgeon if it will make a difference to the date.  It depends how you feel about it.  Some people are willing to wait a bit longer without concern. 


When I mentioned Brachytherapy to the Urologist he sort of looked amused, although they might be able to offer it easier now.


I could name the surgeon but it's not allowed on here.  Needless to say, so far, I think he's someone from above and even if it goes a bit pear shaped I've had 3 good years.   I've never met him since that first meeting although I've seen him in his office.


Also I've always been impressed by the courtesy and care I've had from everyone I met.  At the op they were great.


All the best,
Peter


 

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 03:44
I saw two consultant surgeons and one oncologist before I opted for surgery.

They concurred with the Multi Disciplinary Team, a committee of around ten medics with different specialisations who consider each case and recommend a course of treatment. They said surgery was the way to go for me.

What was their recommendation in your situation?

Best of luck.

Cheers, John.
User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 10:00

Colin, here are some things to think about and ask the consultants. Always take a written list of questions with you, so you don't forget to ask anything. Leave space to write the answers in, and do this during the consultation if possible, or the instant you come out. (My consultant grabs my question sheet and writes the answers on it.) Many places are happy for you to record the consultation on a smartphone providing you ask, and that enables you to go back afterwards and pick up bits you missed because you were thinking about something else at that moment. (One or two places will do that for you and give you it on a CD afterwards.)


With the N1 (lymph node spread), I would want to ask the urologist how certain they would be at catching all spread to lymph nodes with a RP (radical prostatecomy), how many nodes they expect to remove, and what the consequences of that might be (e.g. chance of lymphodaema afterwards). You have the option of radiotherapy afterwards if not everything was caught, but if there's a significant chance of needing to use that and ending up with side effects from both procedures, you would probably be better to go for just radiotherapy at the outset which is significantly more likely to catch everything and give you fewer side effects than having both procedures, and less likely to give you lymphodaema. Also, ask about the possibility of nerve sparing, which gives you a chance of getting natural erections again afterwards, although even with full nerve sparing, that doesn't always work again afterwards, and with partial nerve sparing the chance reduces. If you can't have full nerve sparing (and erections currently work fine), that might be another reason to consider radiotherapy instead. There are a number of different ways to perform a RP (robotic, keyhole, open (very rare now), retzuis sparing, neurosafe, etc), and you might want to ask which way they propose, and people here can then tell you what you might expect from their own personal experience.


For radiotherapy, there's a treatment pattern called "prostate and nodes" which they might use which treats the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, sometimes with a brachytherapy boost to the prostate. (This often depends if that treatment centre has brachytherapy capability.) Again, ask about expected side effects. Ask if you could have SpaceOAR fitted to reduce impact on rectum (probably only privately, but they might not be happy to do it with the N1 anyway). Check with consultant, but I suspect the chances of lymphodaema (even with prostate and nodes) is vastly less than with a RP, and chances of damage to erection nerves is less. (Damage to erection nerves with radiotherapy shows up 2-5 years later, not at the time.) I believe the N1 puts you in the high risk category at many treatment centres, and for high risk patients the seminal vesicles are treated too, because they can't go back and do them afterwards, but you might want to ask this, although it makes no difference to you at the time. You might want to ask what the expected duration of the hormone therapy is. A T2xN1 diagnosis is not that common I think. For a T3xN1, chemotherapy is often offered too nowadays.


If you use my comments to make any decisions, do show my comments to the consultants so they can tell you if any of them don't apply to you, or if they consider risks of side effects or recurrence to be different from what I suggest. If I said anything you didn't understand, please ask - the better you understand the issues, the more you will get from these two consultations.

Edited by member 08 Dec 2019 at 10:23  | Reason: Not specified

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 12:41

Hi Colin,


Not sure which way round is the norm, although I saw the oncologist first, followed by meeting my urology surgeon the next day. I guess either way round gives you a chance to discuss the available treatment options that best suit your needs. And in the mean time you'll be able to put a list of questions together before you meet them.


Good luck.


Kev.

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 12:46

Colin,


Sorry you find yourself a member of this exclusive group.


It's useful to put your diagnosis in your profile so people can check it before answering and tailor answers more specifically to your condition. Gleason is part of it, but also important is your PSA history with dates, staging (e.g. T3aN0M0, or something like that), PIRADS score from MRI scan, and any more detailed information about location of the cancer in the prostate.


It sounds like your MDT (multi-disciplinary team) has decided you are broadly suitable for either a radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT), and is sending you to consultants who deal with each so you can get detailed info from each, and use that to decide which way to go.

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 15:17
A surgeon will talk to you about the surgical option and, if suitable, active surveillance, while the oncologist will talk to you about radiotherapy, brachytherapy and other 'therapies' that a) are suitable and b) available to you
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 16:35
Doesn't really matter which way around. I was seen by the surgeon first, then the oncologist 3 weeks later. Both stressed that whichever route I chose, the outcome would be the same, and that there was no mad rush for me to make my mind up.
User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 17:03

Thanks folks, further to what Andy mentioned other figures were Psa 6.98, Likert 3 lesion in the left lobe, 7/26 cores cancerous T2nomo.


All this came as a surprise as to start with I hadn't gone to docs with any urinary or prostate probs, psa of 5.7 showed up on blood tests I had done during some throat and mouth troubles I had following which I had biopsies taken and a tonsillectomy done thankfully nothing showed up on biopsies from there.


Month or so later had more bloods done which showed the 6.98 figure. So following that had prostate exam, MRI and then the biopsies.


When I saw my consultant last his suggestions were radiotherapy and hormone therapy or radical prostectomy. 

Edited by member 08 Dec 2019 at 12:41  | Reason: Made a mistakr

User
Posted 07 Dec 2019 at 23:43

Hi Colin, I was operated on at Preston almost exactly 3 years ago.  Things have changed since I was there as they hadn't got a robot.  Also I chose surgery from the word go as I was told it was near the edge and wanted it cut out as soon as possible.


I saw the surgeon on the 6th Dec and he operated on the 16th which was pretty quick as he said it would be after Christmas at our meeting.  Although I did mention to him I was ready for the operation right away if he had a spare slot.


In theory I don't think it matters which way you see them as the oncologist could start you on hormones very quickly.  The only reservation I'd have is that if you favour surgery he might put off setting a date until you've seen the oncologist.  Whereas if you said right away you choose surgery he might give you an earlier date.


At the appointment you could ask the surgeon if it will make a difference to the date.  It depends how you feel about it.  Some people are willing to wait a bit longer without concern. 


When I mentioned Brachytherapy to the Urologist he sort of looked amused, although they might be able to offer it easier now.


I could name the surgeon but it's not allowed on here.  Needless to say, so far, I think he's someone from above and even if it goes a bit pear shaped I've had 3 good years.   I've never met him since that first meeting although I've seen him in his office.


Also I've always been impressed by the courtesy and care I've had from everyone I met.  At the op they were great.


All the best,
Peter


 

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 03:44
I saw two consultant surgeons and one oncologist before I opted for surgery.

They concurred with the Multi Disciplinary Team, a committee of around ten medics with different specialisations who consider each case and recommend a course of treatment. They said surgery was the way to go for me.

What was their recommendation in your situation?

Best of luck.

Cheers, John.
User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 10:00

Colin, here are some things to think about and ask the consultants. Always take a written list of questions with you, so you don't forget to ask anything. Leave space to write the answers in, and do this during the consultation if possible, or the instant you come out. (My consultant grabs my question sheet and writes the answers on it.) Many places are happy for you to record the consultation on a smartphone providing you ask, and that enables you to go back afterwards and pick up bits you missed because you were thinking about something else at that moment. (One or two places will do that for you and give you it on a CD afterwards.)


With the N1 (lymph node spread), I would want to ask the urologist how certain they would be at catching all spread to lymph nodes with a RP (radical prostatecomy), how many nodes they expect to remove, and what the consequences of that might be (e.g. chance of lymphodaema afterwards). You have the option of radiotherapy afterwards if not everything was caught, but if there's a significant chance of needing to use that and ending up with side effects from both procedures, you would probably be better to go for just radiotherapy at the outset which is significantly more likely to catch everything and give you fewer side effects than having both procedures, and less likely to give you lymphodaema. Also, ask about the possibility of nerve sparing, which gives you a chance of getting natural erections again afterwards, although even with full nerve sparing, that doesn't always work again afterwards, and with partial nerve sparing the chance reduces. If you can't have full nerve sparing (and erections currently work fine), that might be another reason to consider radiotherapy instead. There are a number of different ways to perform a RP (robotic, keyhole, open (very rare now), retzuis sparing, neurosafe, etc), and you might want to ask which way they propose, and people here can then tell you what you might expect from their own personal experience.


For radiotherapy, there's a treatment pattern called "prostate and nodes" which they might use which treats the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, sometimes with a brachytherapy boost to the prostate. (This often depends if that treatment centre has brachytherapy capability.) Again, ask about expected side effects. Ask if you could have SpaceOAR fitted to reduce impact on rectum (probably only privately, but they might not be happy to do it with the N1 anyway). Check with consultant, but I suspect the chances of lymphodaema (even with prostate and nodes) is vastly less than with a RP, and chances of damage to erection nerves is less. (Damage to erection nerves with radiotherapy shows up 2-5 years later, not at the time.) I believe the N1 puts you in the high risk category at many treatment centres, and for high risk patients the seminal vesicles are treated too, because they can't go back and do them afterwards, but you might want to ask this, although it makes no difference to you at the time. You might want to ask what the expected duration of the hormone therapy is. A T2xN1 diagnosis is not that common I think. For a T3xN1, chemotherapy is often offered too nowadays.


If you use my comments to make any decisions, do show my comments to the consultants so they can tell you if any of them don't apply to you, or if they consider risks of side effects or recurrence to be different from what I suggest. If I said anything you didn't understand, please ask - the better you understand the issues, the more you will get from these two consultations.

Edited by member 08 Dec 2019 at 10:23  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 10:48

John, 


Yes it seemed to be surgery was mentioned first as probably best option with the RT and HT an alternative. 

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 12:45

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member


Colin, here are some things to think about and ask the consultants. Always take a written list of questions with you, so you don't forget to ask anything. Leave space to write the answers in, and do this during the consultation if possible, or the instant you come out. (My consultant grabs my question sheet and writes the answers on it.) Many places are happy for you to record the consultation on a smartphone providing you ask, and that enables you to go back afterwards and pick up bits you missed because you were thinking about something else at that moment. (One or two places will do that for you and give you it on a CD afterwards.)


With the N1 (lymph node spread), I would want to ask the urologist how certain they would be at catching all spread to lymph nodes with a RP (radical prostatecomy), how many nodes they expect to remove, and what the consequences of that might be (e.g. chance of lymphodaema afterwards). You have the option of radiotherapy afterwards if not everything was caught, but if there's a significant chance of needing to use that and ending up with side effects from both procedures, you would probably be better to go for just radiotherapy at the outset which is significantly more likely to catch everything and give you fewer side effects than having both procedures, and less likely to give you lymphodaema. Also, ask about the possibility of nerve sparing, which gives you a chance of getting natural erections again afterwards, although even with full nerve sparing, that doesn't always work again afterwards, and with partial nerve sparing the chance reduces. If you can't have full nerve sparing (and erections currently work fine), that might be another reason to consider radiotherapy instead. There are a number of different ways to perform a RP (robotic, keyhole, open (very rare now), retzuis sparing, neurosafe, etc), and you might want to ask which way they propose, and people here can then tell you what you might expect from their own personal experience.


For radiotherapy, there's a treatment pattern called "prostate and nodes" which they might use which treats the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, sometimes with a brachytherapy boost to the prostate. (This often depends if that treatment centre has brachytherapy capability.) Again, ask about expected side effects. Ask if you could have SpaceOAR fitted to reduce impact on rectum (probably only privately, but they might not be happy to do it with the N1 anyway). Check with consultant, but I suspect the chances of lymphodaema (even with prostate and nodes) is vastly less than with a RP, and chances of damage to erection nerves is less. (Damage to erection nerves with radiotherapy shows up 2-5 years later, not at the time.) I believe the N1 puts you in the high risk category at many treatment centres, and for high risk patients the seminal vesicles are treated too, because they can't go back and do them afterwards, but you might want to ask this, although it makes no difference to you at the time. You might want to ask what the expected duration of the hormone therapy is. A T2xN1 diagnosis is not that common I think. For a T3xN1, chemotherapy is often offered too nowadays.


If you use my comments to make any decisions, do show my comments to the consultants so they can tell you if any of them don't apply to you, or if they consider risks of side effects or recurrence to be different from what I suggest. If I said anything you didn't understand, please ask - the better you understand the issues, the more you will get from these two consultations.



Andy thank you for that, I do apologise though as I made a mistake, it's T1no, not n1. 

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 13:50

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Andy thank you for that, I do apologise though as I made a mistake, it's T1no, not n1.


Ah, that makes a big difference (and I presume you mean T2N0M0), as it moves you from high risk to low risk, and some of my concerns about having a RP no longer apply - RP is more likely to work with a low risk patient. (I wasn't sure T2N1 can even exist.)


So for the RP, you still want to ask about nerve sparing so you have a chance of erections recovering after the operation - this will depend how near to the nerves the cancer is, but they won't know for sure until during the operation. There's also a chance of urinary incontinence - again, this can be influenced by how close the cancer is to the prostate apex, and thus how much damage is done to the external urinary sphincter. It also depends heavily on the surgeon's experience. There is always a risk of finding the cancer was more widespread or more aggressive than the original diagnosis showed, sometimes sufficiently so that RT would have been better.


RT is less likely to result in impotence or incontinence than RP, but it's not impossible. RT increases risk of bowel issues, although those can be avoided by using SpaceOAR to temporarily push the rectum away from the prostate. In the case of RT, you might ask if low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (also known as seed brachytherapy) might be an option. Again, you should ask if you need to be on HT and for how long. With N0, you won't need pelvic nodes included.

Edited by member 08 Dec 2019 at 14:28  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 08 Dec 2019 at 14:04
“I wasn't sure T2N1 can even exist.“

It can. It is also possible but extremely rare to have a T1 with N1 or a T1 with M1
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 10 Dec 2019 at 09:10

With the T2, I was told by the onco urology nurse that It was borderline T3, if my memory serves right.  Should have taken notes at the time as my mind was a bit scrambled on that day. 


I have an app with a urologist today so will ask again for definite answer to this and take notes of what is said. 


This one is to discuss surgery. 


Will update later once I've been. 

User
Posted 10 Dec 2019 at 17:20

Even further now, have seen consultant re surgery. So now apparent that though T2nomo, it's right through the prostate, whereas when I was told the swelling found in the left lobe I assumed it was restricted to the left only, this I was probably told as well on the last occasion so more of a reason to take notes on what is said.


Was all a bit of a shock.


Since I'm in good health and everything else is good I've decided on RP..He said I could have it done on 20th of this month but would to least get xmas over with. 

User
Posted 10 Dec 2019 at 20:52
If there's a clear recommendation for one treatment, then I think you're wise in following the advice. In my own case the clear recommendation was for RT.

Very best wishes for your surgery,

Chris
User
Posted 10 Dec 2019 at 20:55

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
“I wasn't sure T2N1 can even exist.“

It can. It is also possible but extremely rare to have a T1 with N1 or a T1 with M1


I may very well have been a T2N1 myself, because my PSA was abnormally high for the T2C that was detected, and undetectable spread to the lymph nodes was therefore suspected although it couldn't be confirmed. Hence the recommendation in my case for "wide beam" RT to irradiate the whole area rather than just the prostate.


Cheers,


Chris


 

 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK