I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Bladder cancer link.

User
Posted 16 Jan 2020 at 23:38

My hubby has just been diagnosed with prostate cancer. He has had bladder cancer since 2011 which has been treated several times but been free of any further recurrences for about 3 years, but has 6 monthly cystoscopys. It was after his last one that he got a nasty urine infection that wouldn't go away that gp did a blood test that showed psa at 17 where he was referred to urologist. Biopsy has confirmed he has cancer in prostate. Gleason 8. Has been offered with radiotherapy or removal.  Consultant scared him by saying they could remove bladder at same time as prostate if he chose removal as it would be easier op. He really does not want a bag on, and is now really scared. Any advice please...

User
Posted 17 Jan 2020 at 02:43

Hi Louis,

Sorry you join us because your husband has been diagnosed with PCa. Deciding on the best way forward can be a dilemma when only treatment to the Prostate is involved but addition treatment to the bladder complicates the choice. It seems to me from what you tell us that hubby would prefer not to have his bladder removed unless this was essential. It would seem that he could have just the Prostate removed or have RT instead but with curative objective. I assume he had surgery on his bladder and with the regular check ups there is no cancer in his bladder. If this is the situation it comes to either opting for surgery or RT bearing in mind not only the immediate effects but also side effects. A case could be made for and against either treatment. Should I be in this position I would incline towards surgery which would also enable RT to be used subsequently as thought appropriate to deal with any other residual or future cancer in the area. Opting for RT now could mean using the total permitted dose so no reserve to deal with any cancer in due course. Also, if RT was unsuccessful, subsequent removal of the Prostate is much more difficult and not many surgeons will attempt it. This is how I see it based on the very limited information provided and is not advice. Side effects of treatments have also to be taken into consideration and in this respect I suggest you obtain the 'Tool Kit' which details these and a lot of other useful information :- https://prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information/our-publications/publications/tool-kit?_ga=2.206109653.795867346.1564408880-1013787081.1564408880

 

 

Edited by member 17 Jan 2020 at 02:43  | Reason: to highlight link

Barry
User
Posted 17 Jan 2020 at 08:33

Thanks Barry, I think he is going for removal of the prostate but leaving the bladder. I think you've got a point that RT could be used afterwards if required. Thanks again. It's a bit overwhelming at the moment. He's seeing surgeon next week to discuss.

User
Posted 17 Jan 2020 at 09:41

Thanks Andrew, prostate consultant didn't give a T number just said it was confined to prostate and not in bones. Gleason score 8. His bladder cancer was confined to lining and hadn't spread through walls. He had huge mass but this was scraped off over a few sessions and he was given Mitamycin washes. It recurred over the years but has been clear for a couple of years. He has coped very well with it but this prostate diagnosis has knocked him for 6! I think he's thinking he had won the battle with the bladder and now the prostate cancer jeopardises that. Sorry for the non medical jargon we don't have gradings etc as were a bit stunned at appointment and told to go away and decide what treatment he wanted to go for. He seems to have decided to go for surgery on prostate, leaving bladder and we see surgeon next week to discuss.

Thanks again

Louis B

User
Posted 20 Jul 2020 at 05:41
Reported to moderators
 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK