Hi. I am having difficulty deciding whether to have a Biopsy & would be grateful for some feedback.
I have always peed for England (I think anxiety related & also added a Diuretic - Indapamide to my Blood Pressure meds about 18 mths ago) but post lockdown decided to check with GP as I felt it had become more urgent & sometimes a few times at night.
In May 2021 I had DRE at Surgery, normal. Raised PSA of 8.52. Referal to Urology Dept. Further to offer of monitoring PSA or mpMRI I elected to go for mpMRI. Results were then discussed at Urology appointment: '1mm PIRAD 3 Lesion with early enhancement with a high PSA density of 0.23'. Option of repeat PSA in 3 months or LATP Prostrate Biopsy or GA template Biopsy. I elected for further PSA test.
I had a second PSA test in September 2021 this was 8.48 so a little lower. Further Urology appointment. The clinicians view was that my options remained much the same as in May. That the only way to have clarity was to have a Biopsy but that I could continue monitoring PSA. I decided to continue monitoring PSA with option to request Biopsy if I changed my mind.
My conundrum is to decide which way to go. I am in a relatively new relationship with a Lady whom I am growing very fond of. The side effects of the LATP Biopsy from the information I have found on this site & from discussion with a friend who has had one suggest that it is a pretty unpleasant procedure & blood in urine & semen along with albeit a pretty small possibility of erectile disfunction are not exactly the perfect start to a newish Romance! That said we are both grown ups (well she is!) I'm 69 & she is 60 & a very down to earth and sensible woman.
I have no family history of cancer & I'm generally fit. I want to avoid starting down the road of having invasive procedures if this is at all avoidable. But equally I am a worry wort & don't want to take unnecessary risks.
My decision at the end of the day but any input would be gratefully received.
Warm Wishes
Chris