Hi Pete, I too am not one for social media, this is the only social media account I have. This group is naturally biased towards people with unusual problems. The "normal" people just get diagnosed treated and move on, if they join this group they leave after a year or two when everything is ok. The people with on going problems remain, so this group is heavily biased towards the unusual prostate cancer cases. Lyn has been on this group over ten years so she remembers these exceptionally unfortunate people, but they are in no way representative of the majority of cases.
At the moment you can only go with the tiny bit of information available to you, and statistics based on that information, "what if"s are pointless. The very few figures we have about you can be fed into a formula (called a nomogram) and they give you various survival rates for a number of years.
I was really surprised when I found out the prostate cancer specific survival rate in the first year is 101.6% . I though that is impossible! But what it means is that you have more chance of dying in the next year from something other than prostate cancer. So pay attention when you walk across the road tomorrow, that bus is more likely to kill you than prostate cancer.
Neither, me, Lyn, or your GP know anything other than your PSA of 7.9 which on its own gives you a 40% chance of having cancer, your age which gives you a 60% chance of having cancer, and the DRE which does suggest quite a high chance of cancer, but not that it is anything beyond locally advanced which is curable.
Now if you live in perpetual fear of being run over by buses, then you should worry a lot about prostate cancer, but if you have managed to come to terms with daily living, and are not petrified to step out of the door, then worry no more about prostate cancer until a urologist tells you you have something to worry about.
Apologies if you suffer from trocophobia.
Edited by member 15 Nov 2021 at 09:31
| Reason: Not specified