I agree: it's confusing. As you say, the urether is stitched onto the bladder so there is always some BNR. It varies in degree. Mine was large due to a large median lobe. But the effect is the same: it made no odds. The issue is not so much the bladder (it can be twitchy, but that settles) but the other end, the urethra, with about 10mm used up by stitches. It's that recovering that drives continence. For me, a week with a catheter is at the short end: there are clots to pass etc. So putting it back in is not the end of the world and as the urethra heals, this is less time spent leaking, in all likelihood.
I suspect OH DID speak to the surgeon but the GA washed it away. I took notes and for my first post-op the surgeon wrote *** was here. Of other procedures where I did not do this - nothing. In other words, breathe a bit and as you are doing, look to the next meeting. Maybe start it with a laugh about forgetting the post-op (and make him or her cover if necessary) rather than leading with the chin and getting a poke "I did come" etc.
Now, for that histology report, hope for the best and prepare for the worst. It should be OK but these meetings can be very disappointing: mine was a horror story of EPE, upgrade, upstage, you name it, and with 4+3 bilateral, OH might need more treatment at some point. The surgeon will no doubt soothe and reassure, but come away with the name of the ART/SRT specialist you might be seeing as when and if. Frankly these surgeons overstay their welcome: IMO followups should always be with RT people. Hard to influence in that direction until the PSA rises or whatever but good to go in that direction. What is a surgeon going to do with recurrence? Good luck with the histology. ADD - as well as horror stories, downgrades do happen so it really is a bit of luck now. END ADD
Edited by member 04 Jan 2022 at 12:39
| Reason: add