Afternoon Marvin
I was diagnosed with prostate cancer last June ( Category 2, Gleason 3+4=7, PSA at that time was 5.76) and initially opted for Active Surveillance. A further PSA test last September found that my PSA had risen to 6.01, leading to a another biopsy (First biopsy was in June) and finding that although the grading of cancer was the same there was more of it throughout my prostate. Because of the rising PSA level and because more cancer was found it was suggested that I should now opt for treatment. I was offered surgery or RT. I opted for surgery because:
- For me it was good to have a quick treatment and to, hopefully, have all of the cancer removed (scans etc had confirmed that the cancer was still contained within the capsule)
-You generally cannot have your prostate removed after RT but can have RT after having surgery
- RT can cause issues many, many years after having it.
- It was useful, for me, to know what the final grading and extent of the cancer was ( the prostate is diced and sliced after it is removed and a fully biopsy is undertaken)
There are obviously side effects for both treatments and the side effects affect people in different ways but on balance the potential side effects by having surgery did not affect my decision. As a matter of interest, 8 weeks on from surgery I am now fully continent, my ED is improving and the full biopsy of my prostate confirmed that although the grading was still the same there was more of it and the cancer was bulging out from the capsule.
Ivan