My husband had open RP on the recommendation of his urologist who is one of the leading robotic RP surgeons. In his case, open was recommended because he had had previous abdominal surgery (appendectomy), the scarring from which might potentially have impacted on the laparoscopic routes in, and because the surgeon felt that he would be able to get a cleaner, more precise cut to save the nerve bundles. Yes, it was a longer stay in hospital and more weeks off work but not a huge difference in the bigger scheme of things.
Anther reason that open is sometimes preferable - a man with heart problems may not be able to have laparoscopic because you are tipped head down for a few hours which puts a lot of strain on the heart. Also, men who have had mesh repairs (e g. for a hernia) may not be able to have laparoscopic RP.
The last time NHS data was published, open RP still had slightly better outcomes than robotic in terms of continence, erectile function and positive margins but I suspect that in the last 4 or 5 years, robotic surgery will have improved.
Edited by member 20 May 2022 at 01:25
| Reason: Not specified