Hi All,
Following a raised PSA of 7.25 and an MRI showing a 9 mm suspicious area with a PIRAD score of 4, last Friday I had a transperineal biopsy.
Before I had the biopsy procedure, I did a lot of reading on this site and I spoke to the specialist nurses, and felt pretty confident that I had enough knowledge about what I was getting into. However, there are a few things that the Doctor who performed the biopsies said that have left me with some doubts about the accuracy of the biopsy and the information he gave. I wish I had challenged him on a few points, but the procedure was so uncomfortable that I only thought about these issues afterward.
PIRADS Score:
With a PIRADS score of 4, I was thinking that, whilst there’s a fair likelihood that cancer might be found when the samples are analysed, this is not definite, and there could still be no cancer found. However, the Doctor who did the biopsy said that less than 25% of people with a PIRADS of 4 score have cancer, which contradicts the information I've read about PIRADS on this website. I don’t want false hope – I want to be realistic and ready for any bad news, and it's left me feeling unsure about what the PIRADS score means.
DRE (Digital Rectal Examination):
He mentioned that the DRE showed no areas of roughness or bumpiness and declared "it's benign!" He said this literally whilst my legs were up in the stirrups. I thought that cancers contained within the prostate capsule can often not be detected on a DRE. I'm not sure he was in a position to offer me this reassurance, which has raised questions about other things he said.
Prostate Size:
The Doctor mentioned that 26 samples were taken, with most from the area where the abnormality was found. However, he described my prostate as 'huge', measuring 110cc, and stated that an average-sized prostate is 20cc. I joked saying 'I'll take that as a compliment' but he then claimed this means that locating any cancerous cells is like "finding a needle in a haystack." I kick myself for not asking him to confirm whether the MRI images were used to guide the biopsy, bearing in mind at the time I could feel the needles pinching inside me! I later asked the specialist nurse on here and they could not confirm whether all hospitals use the MRI images to guide sample collection. I now have doubts about whether, if cancer is found, they have located the full extent of it and whether, if cancer is not found, it could have been missed completely.
I'm planning to raise these issues with my consultant at the results appointment.
Are biopsies sometimes carried out without using the MRI images?
What questions should I be asking my consultant?
Has anyone had a similar experience?
Edited by member 01 Nov 2023 at 13:20
| Reason: missed a figure out