Hi Skeggie
With my diagnosis (transitional zone) there are a number of factors.
Firstly, transitional zone cancers are historically known to be aggressive cancers and usually quite large.
second, If you read the statistics from John Hopkins, the usual intervention period for men on AS is two years, (59%) but remember all different medical trusts differ in their treatment regime.
Third, I am 64 and still reasonably fit,I don’t do any exercises but I am active (golf, sailing when I get chance, and I do a lot of DIY. My reasoning is if I leave it for 2 to 5 years, will I still be able to cope with the side effects, probably of radiotherapy and HT as I may not be able to have surgery.
finally, my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007had the mammogram and biopsy and was told she had a 5 cm tumour, she decided to have a mastectomy as there was lymph node involvement, guess how surprised we were when the oncologist came out and told us there was a second tumour of 4 cm that they missed in the scan.
The decision you make is based on how you feel about living with cancer, where in the prostate the cancer is and how much do you trust the biopsy… did they get the highest scoring core. What experience have you of people with cancer, this may help you make a decision as well. It is also worth noting that transitional zone cancers have less chance of recurrence than a peripheral zone cancer after surgery, 8% against 18%
All this considered, I discussed it with my wife and we both decided the risk of incontinence is preferable to all the side effect with rat and HT, ED shouldn’t be a problem as at the moment the tumour is well away from the nerve bundles.
hope this helps
Paul