I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Questions about new diagnosis

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 10:26

Hi

Sorry for the long first post !

I've been recently diagnosed T2 and Gleason 7 (4+3), currently contained in prostate.  MRI showed 12mm lesion

I'm not sure if this has all actually sunk in yet and, unfortunately, I've never been the most optimistic person.  I always expect the worst and if it doesn't happen then it's a bonus.

I have a couple of questions if anyone can advise please.

Although the diagnosis process seemed to be reasonably quick, I actually had the PSA blood results back in September (now November).   Never had PSA test before so don't have point of reference.  I have an appointment with an oncologist in a few days but have another 3 week wait after that for the urologist.

It will then be another wait for whatever treatment I choose - another thing I'm really dreading.  I've been told that surgery could be up to 3 months.  Don't know about radiation if I have that option.  So that could potentially be up to 7 months from the initial blood test and 4 or 5 months from diagnosis. I don't know what to choose but I don't want to be forced down one route just because I might get the treatment quicker.

I know the information says that prostate cancer is usually slow growing.  But it's that word "usually" that gets me.  I obviously have no idea how long it's already been there.  I was also told before the biopsy that the lesion was close to the edge of the prostate which is another worry.  I don't know how close to the edge.

 Think I'm just looking for a bit of reassurance from anyone with experience that it's not likely to spread any time soon.  But I know everyone is different.    But I also think I just need to get my feelings out there, whether anyone reads this or not !

The other question was about PSMA Pet scans.  Since these seem to be more accurate I don't know why they only seem to be used for recurrent cancer rather than during initial diagnosis ?  Is this just a lack of availability or resourcing issue (NHS) ?  Surely if a more sensitive scan picks something up then it would affect the treatment plan ?   I'm even debating seeing if I could pay for one privately but have no idea of cost or how to go about this.  

If you've got this far then thanks for reading :-)

John

 

 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 16:44

Hi

Obviously I'll know more after speaking to both the oncologist and urologist but I'm assuming I'll have the option of surgery or radiation.

I'm dreading having to make the decision between the two as I'm terrible at making decisions at the best of times, but this is literally a potential life changing decision.

I've never had any kind of surgery before so even the thought of the surgery itself scares me, let alone the side effects.  But that shouldn't be my defining factor - it should be the ultimate long term outcome.

Much like everything in life people will have had good and bad experiences with either option.  If your experience was bad then you'll think - "I really wish I'd gone for the other option"

I'd be really interested to hear other peoples' thought process when they made their own choice and why they ultimately went that way.

Thanks all

John

 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 17:29

Hi John, 

My diagnosis was very similar to yours. My thought process at the time was that I wanted AS, but that wasn't an option with 4+3=7. I didn't fancy a couple of years on HT but as it happened, the MDT recommended surgery anyway. I didn't fancy the prospect of ED but I was suitable for nerve sparing surgery. I went along with the MDT's recommendation mostly because I was leaning that way. My oncologist was with the MDT but said he would treat me if I changed my mind. Ultimately the final decision was mine. 

You might find that you get similar advice once the MDT has met and discussed your case. It may be surgery or RT/HT. 

All I can say is to read up on the treatment options, risks and side effects etc of either. Have plenty of questions written down to ask your oncologist and urologist.

Hope this helps. 

Good luck.

Kev.

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 14:47

Hi again John.

Regarding your information, its best to put as much as you can on your profile, mate. If you do that, it will save you having to repeat yourself in other conversations.

Obviously it's not good to see any PSA rise, and I understand your concern, however, it's not always a sign of disease progression. You haven't had enough tests yet to show if its a continuous rise. At least you are now in good hands, I'd be expressing your concerns assertively but politely to your oncologist/urologist.

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 16:31

Your Gleason score is very favourable but remember that it is a very simple guide. You can only have certainty if you have prostatectomy and then the Gleason score can be confirmed - it may go down or up. In the mean time, if you can afford to have a private PSMA imaging carried out you will know about the extent of the spread and   particularly about the clear margins at the boundary of the gland; this will give some indication of the severity of the cancer. My Gleason score before and after the surgery was 3+4 & 4+3 (less favourable then yours).That was 13 years ago at the age of 72. Unfortunately, depending on your nature, the anxiety will accompany you, as mine does even now, through your journey; it does get better. I think so far you are in a good place. The quality of treatment in the last decade has improved a great deal and the success rates have improved since my surgery. Good luck.

Edited by member 18 Nov 2024 at 16:34  | Reason: Not specified

 'Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that’s not why we do it.'                    Richard Feynman (1918-1988) Nobel Prize laureate

 

 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 16:44

John,

Here in the states PSMA PETS are standard after the Biopsy, as are Mp MRI’s prior to biopsy for most the physician’s dealing with initial diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer prior to treatment decision. The PET’s are important for seeing metastatic disease, which bone scans in the past were often used and still are.

Certainly understand your concern over aggressive or advanced but that often is typically important in determining treatment but not necessarily aggressiveness in speed of your cancer actually growing inside of you. Yes its optimum to get the cancer before its breeched the capsule, but even when it has, it not considered metastasized. Most treatment options are still available. Studies have shown up to six months from diagnosis to treatment has shown it does not affect outcome of the treatments.

Good luck! 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 21:52

Hi John 

Sorry that you’ve had to join us.

My first PSA was in mid June, followed by a second in July, then MRI and biopsy leading to diagnosis on 11 September and so your timescales are pretty consistent. I then had a 4 week wait to see the urologist and we decided on surgery a few days later. I was offered a surgery date of early December but I want to wait until early January so that I can have a special Christmas with the family. 

You’ll go through a range of emotions on this journey, but over time you start to make sense of it. I found the hardest parts to be the waiting between appointments and then having the option to choose a treatment option, but once you have made this decision it becomes a little easier. Try and keep yourself busy and enjoy any hobbies to distract you from the anxiety. 

I haven’t been offered a PET Scan as it’s contained to the prostate, however the surgeon said he can’t see the tumour in one side of the prostate from the MRI and so perhaps I should have pushed for one!! 

Wishing you all the best 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 20:11
Hi, It is the most difficult decision most of us have to make, I was advised to go onto the NHS Prostrate predict and after seeing there was little difference in perecentage of success I went with 3months HT (Bicalutamide) and 20 fractions of Radiotherapy, my Radiotherapy finished June 2023 and my PSA is now at 0.5, I have no regrets on my decision, but once I made it I felt relieved and just got on with it, cheers John
User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 19:17

Hi jarweb,

You asked how people chose between Radiotherapy or Surgery.

I chose surgery over Radio Therapy/ Hormone Therapy because I didn't want the H.T. to interfere with my sex drive.  The Radiologist was not happy to give just the R.T. without the H.T., so surgery it was for me.

I have enduring urinary incontinence following the surgery (as well as Erectile Dysfunction) so, surgery has not been a walk in the park for me, but with Alprostadil injections I have been able to adapt to a (kind of) sex life. And I still enjoy a healthy sex drive.  

Horses for courses...

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

JedSee.

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 20:58

Hi,

They do that in the UK in a small number of hospitals. I had it on the NHS back in 2019.

Neurosafe with frozen section during Radical Prostatectomy. 

Basically they have a (pathologist?) in the next room who performs a check on the prostate while you're still on the operating table.

I had a conversation with my surgeon a few months after surgery, there was a positive margin and he described how he used the robot to apply heat to burn the area before closing me up. The positive margin was documented in my post op histology. 

Cheers, 

Kev.

 

Edited by member 20 Nov 2024 at 21:01  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 21:33

Probably costs a bit and takes some organising too. My hospital was/is a centre of excellence for urology so I'm lucky to have it on my doorstep. I think there are a couple of places in London offering the same. I know of another member on here who went down the private route, think he got a nice room whereas I was on the ward overlooking St Evenage.

Cheers, 

Kev.

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 10:57

Hi John, 

I can't really answer the technical questions but I can offer some reassurance. 

I was diagnosed over 5 years ago with a T2 4+3=7 and I'm still here alive and well. I won't deny that it's been a difficult journey at times but my latest PSA result is now undetectable. 

Hopefully others on this great site will add their positive experiences and advice. 

Good luck, 

Kev.

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 11:47

On the question of timing, you might find it reassuring to have a look at this (American) video - a lot of it is interesting but the section from 11.02 addresses the question specifically for Gleason 7 patients.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aotF2SPzCmU

On PSMA PET scans I think you are right and that they should ideally be used for initial diagnosis as well as in the context of recurrence because they are much better at detecting spread than the traditional bone scans which have been used in the past. If they are not yet being offered routinely then it probably is often a matter of resources.

Best wishes for your future treatment

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 12:17

Thanks Kev & KS25 for the replies.

Yeah - I've been watching a lot of the PCRI Youtube videos and did see that one a while ago.  It was actually these that initially alerted me to the newer PSMA pet scans as the main man in the videos mentions them a LOT in the more recent videos.  But with a lot of the newer methods and technologies these people mention,  it depends on availability and where you live. 

I know the NHS does have the scanners available but, as I said, the scans aren't used routinely during diagnosis.  I just think this could potentially pick up disease that may have already spread that the MRI and bone scans didn't. 

I could be wrong but I assume surgery would be pointless if there has already been any kind of spread, even small ?

Thanks

 

 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 12:57

Dr Scholz does mention PSMA PET scans a lot - he believes that they are a massive step forward in prostate cancer treatment, comparable to the discovery of PSA itself.

One of the ways that they are changing things is that they are  opening up the possibility of attempting curative treatment even for some men with only a few spots of metastatic spread, whereas in the past any evidence of spread would generally mean moving straight onto systemic treatments like hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy.

I don't know if radiotherapy for metastatic spots could be combined with surgery ( and I imagine Dr Scholz would not advocate surgery in any circumstances) but it might well mean that radiotherapy was still a possibility.

But let's hope that this proves to be an academic issue in your case.

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 13:10

Hi John.

I'm sorry that you've had to join us but welcome to the forum.

 I know you hate 'usually' to describe possible disease progression and treatment outcomes, but as you say,  everyone is different and there are no certainties.

What age are you mate and what is your PSA?

In general, your staging and Gleason score is about the average diagnosis for folk on here. I'm not medically qualified, but would say that although its always nice to get sorted asap, that in your case there is no need to rush anything. I don't think there's any need to concerning yourself over advanced scans, or spending any dosh on private treatment.

In relation to your surgery enquiry, the cut off point seems to generally be T3b staging. I had surgery when mine had breached the prostate capsule (T3a) and I had a high Gleason 9 (4+5). Two years later my PSA is undetectable. 

I know how difficult it is, especially if you're a bit of a pessimist, to see the positives, but you're in a decent position mate. The treatment timescales you've mentioned seem normal. I ended up waiting 6  months for my op.

I wish you all the best.👍

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 13:26

Hi Adrian - thanks for reply.

Sorry, should probably have given more info initially but my post was already very long !

I turned 59 just at the final confirmation stage - happy birthday to me.

When I got the initial PSA test done at the GP the PSA was 7.9.  But they took bloods again just before the biopsy a month later and I only found out last week that the PSA at that time was 9.8 

This REALLY shocked and worried me and I phoned the specialist NHS nurse who said "don't worry about it" - not easy to do.  She said your PSA can vary day to day - don't know how true this is or if it can vary by that much. 

I think this has really added to my concern about the waiting just now.  I'd have been worried if the PSA jumped 2 points over a year, never mind a month.

Thanks

 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 14:47

Hi again John.

Regarding your information, its best to put as much as you can on your profile, mate. If you do that, it will save you having to repeat yourself in other conversations.

Obviously it's not good to see any PSA rise, and I understand your concern, however, it's not always a sign of disease progression. You haven't had enough tests yet to show if its a continuous rise. At least you are now in good hands, I'd be expressing your concerns assertively but politely to your oncologist/urologist.

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 16:31

Your Gleason score is very favourable but remember that it is a very simple guide. You can only have certainty if you have prostatectomy and then the Gleason score can be confirmed - it may go down or up. In the mean time, if you can afford to have a private PSMA imaging carried out you will know about the extent of the spread and   particularly about the clear margins at the boundary of the gland; this will give some indication of the severity of the cancer. My Gleason score before and after the surgery was 3+4 & 4+3 (less favourable then yours).That was 13 years ago at the age of 72. Unfortunately, depending on your nature, the anxiety will accompany you, as mine does even now, through your journey; it does get better. I think so far you are in a good place. The quality of treatment in the last decade has improved a great deal and the success rates have improved since my surgery. Good luck.

Edited by member 18 Nov 2024 at 16:34  | Reason: Not specified

 'Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that’s not why we do it.'                    Richard Feynman (1918-1988) Nobel Prize laureate

 

 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 16:44

John,

Here in the states PSMA PETS are standard after the Biopsy, as are Mp MRI’s prior to biopsy for most the physician’s dealing with initial diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer prior to treatment decision. The PET’s are important for seeing metastatic disease, which bone scans in the past were often used and still are.

Certainly understand your concern over aggressive or advanced but that often is typically important in determining treatment but not necessarily aggressiveness in speed of your cancer actually growing inside of you. Yes its optimum to get the cancer before its breeched the capsule, but even when it has, it not considered metastasized. Most treatment options are still available. Studies have shown up to six months from diagnosis to treatment has shown it does not affect outcome of the treatments.

Good luck! 

User
Posted 18 Nov 2024 at 21:52

Hi John 

Sorry that you’ve had to join us.

My first PSA was in mid June, followed by a second in July, then MRI and biopsy leading to diagnosis on 11 September and so your timescales are pretty consistent. I then had a 4 week wait to see the urologist and we decided on surgery a few days later. I was offered a surgery date of early December but I want to wait until early January so that I can have a special Christmas with the family. 

You’ll go through a range of emotions on this journey, but over time you start to make sense of it. I found the hardest parts to be the waiting between appointments and then having the option to choose a treatment option, but once you have made this decision it becomes a little easier. Try and keep yourself busy and enjoy any hobbies to distract you from the anxiety. 

I haven’t been offered a PET Scan as it’s contained to the prostate, however the surgeon said he can’t see the tumour in one side of the prostate from the MRI and so perhaps I should have pushed for one!! 

Wishing you all the best 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 16:44

Hi

Obviously I'll know more after speaking to both the oncologist and urologist but I'm assuming I'll have the option of surgery or radiation.

I'm dreading having to make the decision between the two as I'm terrible at making decisions at the best of times, but this is literally a potential life changing decision.

I've never had any kind of surgery before so even the thought of the surgery itself scares me, let alone the side effects.  But that shouldn't be my defining factor - it should be the ultimate long term outcome.

Much like everything in life people will have had good and bad experiences with either option.  If your experience was bad then you'll think - "I really wish I'd gone for the other option"

I'd be really interested to hear other peoples' thought process when they made their own choice and why they ultimately went that way.

Thanks all

John

 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 17:29

Hi John, 

My diagnosis was very similar to yours. My thought process at the time was that I wanted AS, but that wasn't an option with 4+3=7. I didn't fancy a couple of years on HT but as it happened, the MDT recommended surgery anyway. I didn't fancy the prospect of ED but I was suitable for nerve sparing surgery. I went along with the MDT's recommendation mostly because I was leaning that way. My oncologist was with the MDT but said he would treat me if I changed my mind. Ultimately the final decision was mine. 

You might find that you get similar advice once the MDT has met and discussed your case. It may be surgery or RT/HT. 

All I can say is to read up on the treatment options, risks and side effects etc of either. Have plenty of questions written down to ask your oncologist and urologist.

Hope this helps. 

Good luck.

Kev.

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 17:40

John,

I was very scared of surgery and side effects  including just the thought of a catheter for 10 days. Both surgery and radiation have side effects some overlap and others like rectal are radiation. Today versus years ago leaps in technology have come to minimize side effects in both procedures. Surgery with Puboprostatic ligament sparing, and Retzius sparing along with procedure technique to reduce or eliminate incontinence. Nerve sparing for ED issues and Robotic Single port entry for overall quicker surgery recovery. Now with Radiation, the development of Space Oar Hydrogel is used to minimize rectal side effects. 
For me choosing Surgery also had to do knowing that I would still have Radiation as a backup and approaching 71 the window to receiving surgery was getting closer to close regardless approaching 75 but sooner if my health were to deteriorate for any other reasons and preclude surgery. Salvage Radiation is much easier than a Salvage surgery as the surgery is considered much more difficult and done only by certain surgeons very experienced in that salvage surgery. Twenty years ago I had non-hodgkins lymphoma and my Oncologist recommended a lower chemotherapy regimen than CHOP saying we wanted to keep that in reserve for relapse or transformation. I liked having that as backup and I was blessed to go into remission and remain.

Another reason I chose surgery was that while I was in surgery after the prostate was removed and tissue to check on margins the tissue was sent immediately to the hospital pathology for staining to see whether I had clear margins. This clearly delays the closing of the surgery and in my case my margins did come back positive which surprised the surgeon because based on the hundreds of tissue he visually has seen in surgery which he did not see anything unusual and the PET scan saying it was contained within the prostate really was a surprise. Many Surgeons do not bother with this and at your post surgery appointment they give you the disappointing news that you have positive margin. Well my Surgeon was then able to go back in for 2 more hours delicately continuing nerve sparing and cut for more margin and at my post surgery appointment I was told the final margin was then negative. Without that additional step of my tissue going to pathology I would have been told at my post surgery appointment that unfortunately you have positive margin as many are. His afternoon surgery appointment got delayed by two hours by the surprised breeching of the capsule by the cancer. Immediately upon my catheter coming out I was continent and have minimal ED side effects 90 days out with more improvement expected. I was up walking immediately after surgery and did not even spend that night after surgery in the hospital. Within two weeks I was back to normal activities like driving and getting out and around and traveling. Although my catheter was in for 10 days that was due to a 3 day holiday period but that allowed my surgery to continue to heal. Now on a downside I did get a blood clot in my leg from the surgery likely due to my surgery taking much longer than expected but blood clots are a side effect of any surgery not tied to prostate surgery. Anyways my thoughts on my direction I chose.

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 18:37

Hi Ned

Thanks for your feedback.  That all sounds very positive but, unfortunately, I'm not sure many of the techniques or processes you mentioned are actually available to me (UK NHS).  But I can certainly mention these to the urologist for info.  

Cheers

 

 

User
Posted 19 Nov 2024 at 20:11
Hi, It is the most difficult decision most of us have to make, I was advised to go onto the NHS Prostrate predict and after seeing there was little difference in perecentage of success I went with 3months HT (Bicalutamide) and 20 fractions of Radiotherapy, my Radiotherapy finished June 2023 and my PSA is now at 0.5, I have no regrets on my decision, but once I made it I felt relieved and just got on with it, cheers John
User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 19:17

Hi jarweb,

You asked how people chose between Radiotherapy or Surgery.

I chose surgery over Radio Therapy/ Hormone Therapy because I didn't want the H.T. to interfere with my sex drive.  The Radiologist was not happy to give just the R.T. without the H.T., so surgery it was for me.

I have enduring urinary incontinence following the surgery (as well as Erectile Dysfunction) so, surgery has not been a walk in the park for me, but with Alprostadil injections I have been able to adapt to a (kind of) sex life. And I still enjoy a healthy sex drive.  

Horses for courses...

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

JedSee.

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 20:17

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Hi Ned

Thanks for your feedback.  That all sounds very positive but, unfortunately, I'm not sure many of the techniques or processes you mentioned are actually available to me (UK NHS).

I agree.

Ned was operated on in America. He appears to have had access to procedures that are very uncommon here. I've not heard from anyone on the NHS who've been fortunate enough to have margins checked mid prostatectomy. I've seen on TV, eminent UK surgeons, checking margins during other very serious and complex cancer operations, but not during prostate removal. 

Likewise, the single port, puboprostatic ligament, Retizus sparing prostatectomy maybe available here,  but I suspect only in specific hospitals. It was certainly not offered to me.

Ned also mentions that in America PSMA PET scans are standard after biopsy. It seems that here you often have to be have to virtually on deaths door to get one.

Perhaps, it shows that if you have the disease, America is the place to be?

I was just grateful, despite having to wait 6 months, to get the bog standard 'whip it out' op, in good old Blighty. 😁

Edited by member 20 Nov 2024 at 20:34  | Reason: Additional text

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 20:58

Hi,

They do that in the UK in a small number of hospitals. I had it on the NHS back in 2019.

Neurosafe with frozen section during Radical Prostatectomy. 

Basically they have a (pathologist?) in the next room who performs a check on the prostate while you're still on the operating table.

I had a conversation with my surgeon a few months after surgery, there was a positive margin and he described how he used the robot to apply heat to burn the area before closing me up. The positive margin was documented in my post op histology. 

Cheers, 

Kev.

 

Edited by member 20 Nov 2024 at 21:01  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 21:19

Cheers Kev. I've been here just over a year and had never heard of margin checking mid op or that it was an option here. Like a man in orthopedic shoes, I stand corrected.

It does beg the question, why hasn't it become a standard procedure?

Edited by member 20 Nov 2024 at 21:27  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 20 Nov 2024 at 21:33

Probably costs a bit and takes some organising too. My hospital was/is a centre of excellence for urology so I'm lucky to have it on my doorstep. I think there are a couple of places in London offering the same. I know of another member on here who went down the private route, think he got a nice room whereas I was on the ward overlooking St Evenage.

Cheers, 

Kev.

 
Forum Jump  
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK