Hi all
A recap and update:
PSA 4.8 last October, 5.6 in November, 6.6 in Feb at time of Biopsy.
MRI: PIRADS 4; 37cc; PSAd 0.18 given 6.6 PSA; low diffuse T2 one side; no focal lesions; no other abnormalities / findings outside the prostate.
Biopsy results: Gleason 6 (3+3); T2 no MX (was told T2a but that's not stated in the report); 4 cores positive in left lobe accounting for 20% tissue examined; Perineural invasion present.
In May the PSA test went to 8.4 - on a graphed trajectory akin to an Elon Musk 'salute' - neither being at all acceptable!
I had a urine test that showed no infection and was conscious of not cycling or sex 5+ days before the blood test.
In June I went to see a new specialist in Edinburgh recommended to me and he was rather concerned at the PSA rise and the PSAd now at 0.22 - and above a threshold of 0.2 that he uses as a parameter for safe surveillance.
Further multi-parametric MRI in July showed: prostate volume of 31cc. Within the prostate there is some patchy change in the peripheral zones on both sides but no obvious lesion as such. Therefore, at present the tumour is not visible on this MRI scan.
PSA taken mid July has dropped back to 6.2 - great news! Maybe the Your Phyto & Your Gut+ pills plus cutting out dairy & sugars, upping the good foods and exercise are having an effect?
However with a revised PSAd still hovering around 0.2 the recommendation is at least one and possibly two further PSA tests at three month intervals, to get an understanding of PSA trends. If it is upwards, and in view of the perineural invasion, then the specialists recommendation is a low threshold for moving to treatment. If, on the other hand, it continues to drop, then continue with active surveillance in the knowledge that the recent MRI scan did not show any visible disease, which makes the probability of their being significant grade 4 cancer present, quite low.
So there we are - teetering on the edge of intervention. If it is to be treatment am 'favouring' RP at the moment, but have not yet spoken to an Oncologist about other potential options. Given Iām not yet 60 (and hope I've got 20+ years ahead of me), probably fitter than average for my age and thinking to save chemo / rad for any future reoccurrence then the RP is a good roll of the dice I guess, but the post op physical effects are quite frankly really worrying me.