I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

MRI Report of My Father

User
Posted 06 Feb 2025 at 18:31

Hello, due to a PSA elevation of 6.8 ng/ml, he was recommended to undergo an MRI, and these are the results. I am quite worried about him.

The prostate has maximum diameters of 7.3 x 3.7 x 5.5 cm, with an estimated volume of 78 cc. In T1-weighted sequences without intravenous contrast, a slight signal intensity alteration is identified, appearing as faintly hyperintense areas of indeterminate significance, which, in any case, do not correspond to a suspicious lesion.

There are stromal and glandular hyperplasia changes in the transitional zone, appearing broad, predominantly iso- and hyperintense, with an impression on the bladder floor. No focal hypointense areas in T2 are observed that would suggest clinically significant cancer.

The peripheral zone is broad, with moderately heterogeneous signal intensity, highlighting a PI-RADS 3-4 lesion of approximately 8 mm in maximum diameter (measured on the ADC map). It is located in the posteromedial peripheral zone of the prostatic apex and appears as:

  • Moderately hyperintense on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)
  • Markedly hypointense on the ADC map
  • Hypointense on T2-weighted imaging

If confirmed, the lesion presents a nodular appearance that may extend beyond the posterior glandular border, potentially corresponding to a focus of extraglandular extension, although the length of contact with the glandular contour is less than 1 cm.

No other suspicious lesions are identified in the rest of the gland.
No pelvic or inguinal adenopathy.
Small, millimetric, indeterminate left mesorectal lymph nodes.
No suspicious bone lesions identified.
Small right sacral root cyst at S2-S3.
Stress bladder.
Small left inguinal fat-containing hernia, medial to the inferior epigastric vessels (likely direct).

CONCLUSION:

  • PI-RADS 3-4 lesion in the posteromedial peripheral zone of the prostatic apex.
  • If confirmed, there may be a focus of extraglandular extension.
  • No evidence of lymph node or bone dissemination on this imaging study.
User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 08:07

Murdock, the report is probably a bit to technical for most of us to understand. If you were in the UK I would suggest you call the specialist nurse number at the top of the page. Not sure if the chat and email service they provide extends outside the uk.

Thanks Chris

 

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 08:59

Hi Murdoch.

How old is your dad? His prostate is double normal size, that alone could elevate his PSA. I'm not medically trained but I think the MRI scan seems to have picked up a suspicious area that needs further investigation, especially as it appears to have have extended beyond the prostate. 

I would think the next step would be a biopsy to establish the exact nature of the lesion.

 

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 09:31

Hi again.

I had extraprostatic extension with extensive Gleason 9 (4+5) and they took six months to get me sorted. I'm pretty sure your dad will be okay mate. Best of luck to you both.🤞

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 16:49

Murdock, they found I had extra prostatic extension after my surgery 11 years ago ,I also had positive margins , I'm still here.

Thanks Chris

User
Posted 08 Feb 2025 at 10:14

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Murdock, they found I had extra prostatic extension after my surgery 11 years ago ,I also had positive margins , I'm still here.

Thanks Chris

yeeeahh this is great!. Thank you very much friend, I hope and wish that

you continue here for many more years.

All the best

 
Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 08:07

Murdock, the report is probably a bit to technical for most of us to understand. If you were in the UK I would suggest you call the specialist nurse number at the top of the page. Not sure if the chat and email service they provide extends outside the uk.

Thanks Chris

 

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 08:59

Hi Murdoch.

How old is your dad? His prostate is double normal size, that alone could elevate his PSA. I'm not medically trained but I think the MRI scan seems to have picked up a suspicious area that needs further investigation, especially as it appears to have have extended beyond the prostate. 

I would think the next step would be a biopsy to establish the exact nature of the lesion.

 

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 09:02

Hello Adrian, my father is 78 years old. Precisely that fact of possible extraprostatic extension, although it seems to be minimal, is what has me really stressed. It seems incredible how an 8 mm lesion could already be coming out of the prostate.

The urologist has talked about doing the biopsy in approximately

3 months but it seems too long to me.

Edited by member 07 Feb 2025 at 09:04  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 09:31

Hi again.

I had extraprostatic extension with extensive Gleason 9 (4+5) and they took six months to get me sorted. I'm pretty sure your dad will be okay mate. Best of luck to you both.🤞

User
Posted 07 Feb 2025 at 16:49

Murdock, they found I had extra prostatic extension after my surgery 11 years ago ,I also had positive margins , I'm still here.

Thanks Chris

User
Posted 08 Feb 2025 at 10:14

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Murdock, they found I had extra prostatic extension after my surgery 11 years ago ,I also had positive margins , I'm still here.

Thanks Chris

yeeeahh this is great!. Thank you very much friend, I hope and wish that

you continue here for many more years.

All the best

 
 
Forum Jump  
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK