Hi there
I am 57 and after experiencing increased urges to urinate, my doctor wanted to check my Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Level and do a physical check of my prostate. Although the blood result was 1.37, he discovered abnormalities in the prostate.
My consultant confirmed this and I had an MRI scan two weeks ago.
I have just been told that I have a Pi-Rads 3 diagnosis. The consultant has said he wants to monitor my blood over the coming months and not do a biopsy.
Doing research online it appears that usually having a 3 grade means having a biopsy.
He said the biopsy would be very unpleasant and to be avoided at the moment. It slightly felt like I was being fobbed off. But that might have been my high level of anxiety.
Has anyone else experienced this? Should I push for a biopsy? Any words of advice gratefully received.
Thanks so much
Just seen the report in detail it says:
Background:
Abnormal DRE
PSA 1.37 in Jan 2025
No bothersome LUTS
MRI prostate - prostate size 46 ml, PSAD is 0.02, PIRADS 3
Mild BPH changes are noted. No haemorrhagic signal within the prostate gland.
There is subtle low T2 signal change in the right apical posterior medial periphral zone which demonstrates subtle low ADC signal and enhancement (PiRAD3, Likert3). Nonspecific low T2 signal changes seen in the rest of the peripheral zones, likely inflammatory in nature.
No suspicious lesion in the seminal vesicles.
No gross abnormality in the anorectal junction or the minimally distended urinary bladder.
No enlarged pelvic nodes.
No suspicious bony lesion.
Conclusion:
PiRAD3,Likert3 area in the right peripheral zone with inflammatory changes in the rest of the peripheral zones.Mild BPH changes
If anyone can tell me what this means I would be grateful!
Edited by member 28 Mar 2025 at 09:19
| Reason: Not specified