Hi. I have recently been diagnosed with Gleason 4+3 cancer after nearly three years of monitoring, including three MRI scans and two biopsies, the first of which was ‘clear’. I am currently being told about the various treatment options. I had a bone scan and was told the results at the hospital in a meeting with an oncologist and a surgeon. They seemed to think it was fine - a bit of arthritis here and there- but mention was made of a small ‘uptake’ on the pubic bone which they thought was unlikely to be cancer. Therefore, they thought it was localised. I asked if that area should be the subject of further scans. The oncologist seemed unconvinced. The surgeon said I should have a PET scan if I was anxious about it. I asked if it would delay treatment and he said it would by a few weeks, but he too thought it was unlikely to be spread. I don’t think a further scan would have been discussed if I had not brought it up. Obviously, i am not sure whether to ask for a further scan or not. I don’t want one just for peace of mind. I am assuming that if it has spread, then treatment options would change, so I don’t want to have unnecessary ones now and find out bad news later, but equally, I don’t know whether, say, having a prostatectomy would be beneficial even if it has spread. I have another meeting with a focal therapy doctor this week and will ask them, but I wondered if anyone on here had had any similar experiences, or just opinions?