I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

Brothers diagnosis

User
Posted 07 Jul 2025 at 22:49

Hi all.

I went through the initial stages of PCa diagnosis a few months ago and got the all clear.

Last week my older brother (I'm 60 he is 63) told me his PSA was 84. 

He was given a referral to urology and immediately got a call from a "patient navigator" who would guide him on his journey.

Today he saw the urology consultant who did a DRE.  He said from what he could feel, my brother has prostate cancer.

He said there was no need for an MRI scan and gave him hormone tablets, but told him not to start taking them till he had had a biopsy next Monday.

I'm really confused as this is not anything like I experienced at the same hospital only a few months ago. 

I thought an MRI scan would show the extent of the problem in his prostate. 

It's also different to the way things seem to be done after reading stories on here.

It's concerning that he was given a patient navigator before he had even seen anyone at hospital. 

Am I being paranoid, or is there something I may be missing in the way my brother is being treated? 

Seems all the things I thought would happen haven't. 

Any advice or explanation very welcome please.

Mick 

 

 

User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 01:30
Hi Mick,

Good that you are considered clear of PCa but are being monitored.

As regards your brother, a PSA in the eighties means there is a strong chance of PCa but is not always the case. However, the DRE assessment would have added to this probability. Nowadays, in this situation is more likely that an MRI would be given before biopsy. Interestingly, when I had my diagnosis back in 2007 with a PSA of 17.6, I had a TRUS biopsy before an MRI scan followed by a bone scan which was quite usual at that time. However, not every hospital works the same way or may proceed differently on the basis of how an individual presents. This could be the case with your brother and a decision taken to omit the MRI.

Barry
User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 07:52

Hi Mick,

As Barry says there have been cases of high PSAs that have been caused by none cancerous conditions, but unfortunately, normally it is an indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer.

I can't understand why thy aren't doing an MRI. I thought mpMRI scan images showed any suspicious areas, and whether they were prostate confined. I also believe that they use the images to guide and target the biopsy. A targeted biopsy must be more accurate than using a fixed standard template?

This research seems to support my view:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31022301/

It concludes:

[Among the diagnostic strategies considered, the MRI pathway has the most favourable diagnostic accuracy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Compared to systematic biopsy, it increases the number of significant cancer detected while reducing the number of insignificant cancer diagnosed]

Does your brother know what sort of biopsy he's getting, TRUS, which I think are being faded out, or LATP biopsy done under local anaesthetic or GA?

If your brother is diagnosed with PCa it slightly increases your risk. Is there any other family history of the disease? My dad and younger brother had it, and I have advised my two lads, who are now in their forties, to be aware that they may be more at risk.

My PCa experience has shown me how important it is to have an accurate first biopsy. It's on that that, any further treatments are decided. If my boys ever need diagnosing, I'd advise them to have an MRI and LATP under GA.

I hope his biopsy results are favourable. It's great to see that you're doing your best to look after his interests.👍

Edited by member 08 Jul 2025 at 08:15  | Reason: Typo and additional text

User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 08:28
He will be having a transrectal under local the same as I had.

Maybe as his prostate is very large and knobbly they can forego the MRI scan and just biopsy blind as the targer area is the whole of the prostate.

But the obvious concern is has the capsule been breached.

Time will tell.

My concern about any increased risk to me is that when I had my tests we didn't know about my brother. I know that would probably have made a slight difference to the way I was assessed, but not much.

I also have it in my mind that they only took three samples from two suspect areas of the prostate. That seems quite a low number based on other people's experience. And the phrase keeps on playing in my mind; "They can't tell you that you don't have cancer, just that they didn't find it in the tissue they tested "

Thankyou both for the replies so far.

Mick

User
Posted 14 Jul 2025 at 19:56

Hi Mick, for what it's worth my biopsies were done on the general urological ward at the local hospital, on a US machine on wheels. I believe it's the probe tip used on the 'wand' that is the important part here.

There were no issues with my biopsies (apart from the pain and bleeding!) so I wouldn't be concerned at this stage.

Hopefully they'll get your brother's scans sorted quickly and have a treatment plan sorted for him.

All the best to you both.

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 09:41

Hi Mick,

Sorry to hear about this, the diagnosis process can be very frustrating. I think thatif the MDT has reviewed the biopsy results and decided they need more scans, they're being thorough. 

As for the secretary making a telephone call, I don't think it's unusual, I had calls from a bookings clerk regarding further appointments while I was still waiting on my results.

Good luck mate.

Kev. 

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 14:41
It’s worse getting a result from a non qualified person, as they are completely unable to answer any questions. A secretary notifying he needs more scans infers unfortunately they are ruling in/out spread. A call like that would be a waste of a doctors time, that time is best used contacting patients like your brother once they have all the results, to explain the situation and next steps.

Waiting is awfully stressful, but it’s good they’re being thorough and he’s aware that he needs further tests and they’re in hand. He will soon know what’s what. Best of luck to your brother.

We have to sadly accept that doctors are stretched and hope that they’re managing to deal with all patients in order of need the same as we are expected to accept police don’t attend shoplifts or minor criminal damage or car thefts etc and there are more out of court disposals as there just isn’t the capacity.

Anyway I don’t want to get too political so good luck going forward keep us posted.

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 19:45

Everything is politics unfortunately.  And there are things that our government have no control over such as Trumps erratic manner of conducting business. 

Thank you for wishing my brother well, I truly hope the news won't be too bad. 

He only had a PSA test following on from mine. I was 4.8 and his was 84.

I'm hoping that his positive diagnosis does not impact on me because of the family link. Fingers crossed. 

Mick 

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 01:30
Hi Mick,

Good that you are considered clear of PCa but are being monitored.

As regards your brother, a PSA in the eighties means there is a strong chance of PCa but is not always the case. However, the DRE assessment would have added to this probability. Nowadays, in this situation is more likely that an MRI would be given before biopsy. Interestingly, when I had my diagnosis back in 2007 with a PSA of 17.6, I had a TRUS biopsy before an MRI scan followed by a bone scan which was quite usual at that time. However, not every hospital works the same way or may proceed differently on the basis of how an individual presents. This could be the case with your brother and a decision taken to omit the MRI.

Barry
User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 07:52

Hi Mick,

As Barry says there have been cases of high PSAs that have been caused by none cancerous conditions, but unfortunately, normally it is an indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer.

I can't understand why thy aren't doing an MRI. I thought mpMRI scan images showed any suspicious areas, and whether they were prostate confined. I also believe that they use the images to guide and target the biopsy. A targeted biopsy must be more accurate than using a fixed standard template?

This research seems to support my view:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31022301/

It concludes:

[Among the diagnostic strategies considered, the MRI pathway has the most favourable diagnostic accuracy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Compared to systematic biopsy, it increases the number of significant cancer detected while reducing the number of insignificant cancer diagnosed]

Does your brother know what sort of biopsy he's getting, TRUS, which I think are being faded out, or LATP biopsy done under local anaesthetic or GA?

If your brother is diagnosed with PCa it slightly increases your risk. Is there any other family history of the disease? My dad and younger brother had it, and I have advised my two lads, who are now in their forties, to be aware that they may be more at risk.

My PCa experience has shown me how important it is to have an accurate first biopsy. It's on that that, any further treatments are decided. If my boys ever need diagnosing, I'd advise them to have an MRI and LATP under GA.

I hope his biopsy results are favourable. It's great to see that you're doing your best to look after his interests.👍

Edited by member 08 Jul 2025 at 08:15  | Reason: Typo and additional text

User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 08:28
He will be having a transrectal under local the same as I had.

Maybe as his prostate is very large and knobbly they can forego the MRI scan and just biopsy blind as the targer area is the whole of the prostate.

But the obvious concern is has the capsule been breached.

Time will tell.

My concern about any increased risk to me is that when I had my tests we didn't know about my brother. I know that would probably have made a slight difference to the way I was assessed, but not much.

I also have it in my mind that they only took three samples from two suspect areas of the prostate. That seems quite a low number based on other people's experience. And the phrase keeps on playing in my mind; "They can't tell you that you don't have cancer, just that they didn't find it in the tissue they tested "

Thankyou both for the replies so far.

Mick

User
Posted 08 Jul 2025 at 09:00

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
I also have it in my mind that they only took three samples from two suspect areas of the prostate. That seems quite a low number based on other people's experience. And the phrase keeps on playing in my mind; "They can't tell you that you don't have cancer, just that they didn't find it in the tissue they tested "

I can recall, I'm not sure if it was you or not, of seeing a post about a 3 core biopsy. I thought at the time, that's not thorough enough. 

My first biopsy was TRUS, 14 cores, and they still managed to miss any of the more serious grade cancer.

Apparently it's okay to just have three cores taken if the MRI doesn't suspect anything too untoward. It's a balance of cores against biopsy time and side effects. Call me a cynic, but is it really to save cost?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33273160/

[ In men undergoing in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsies, 3 targeted cores per lesion provide an optimal trade-off between detection of clinically significant tumors and biopsy duration.]

Edited by member 08 Jul 2025 at 09:01  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 14 Jul 2025 at 13:48

So,  the departures from my experience continue with my brothers journey.

When I had my biopsy, it was in the ultrasound department, transrectal ultrasound guided.

My brother had his this morning in a side room on the urology ward. So he's not sure it was ultrasound guided. Do they do it any other way? 

They took six cores from each side of his prostate. 

The consultant said they would organise bone scans as soon as possible,  perhaps even before the biopsy results are available. 

Two week wait now for the biopsy to be seen by the MDT and results are known.

I just hope the differences in the way they are dealing with my brother don't indicate serious issues, but I'm fearing the worst based on my experience. 

Mick 

 

User
Posted 14 Jul 2025 at 19:56

Hi Mick, for what it's worth my biopsies were done on the general urological ward at the local hospital, on a US machine on wheels. I believe it's the probe tip used on the 'wand' that is the important part here.

There were no issues with my biopsies (apart from the pain and bleeding!) so I wouldn't be concerned at this stage.

Hopefully they'll get your brother's scans sorted quickly and have a treatment plan sorted for him.

All the best to you both.

User
Posted 25 Jul 2025 at 16:17
Hi all.

MDT was held this morning.

He received a call from a secretary to tell him they were asking for bone and CT scans.

No information or results at all from the biopsy.

He asked for more but was told no one was available. He rang back to try to speak to someone and the department had closed for the weekend.

And they are asking for better pay! Better performance would be a start!

Sorry I'm ranting but for goodness sake! This is serious stuff and they leave it to a typist to pass on a message. Simply not good enough in my book.

User
Posted 25 Jul 2025 at 17:34

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Hi all.

MDT was held this morning.

He received a call from a secretary to tell him they were asking for bone and CT scans.

No information or results at all from the biopsy.

He asked for more but was told no one was available. He rang back to try to speak to someone and the department had closed for the weekend.

And they are asking for better pay! Better performance would be a start!

Sorry I'm ranting but for goodness sake! This is serious stuff and they leave it to a typist to pass on a message. Simply not good enough in my book.

 

to be fair they are under tremendous pressure, suffered huge pay erosion like other public sectors, and there is a recruitment and retention issue and we ought as a nation listen to the problems they face, for our own sakes.

 

the secretary isn’t able to pass on clinical knowledge and was just asked to notify that he needs further tests. Then MDT will convene and he will get his diagnosis and ask all the questions he needs.

 

it is frustrating, we waited almost two months for last PSA results and the strain cannot be underestimated but anger should be directed at the last few PMs and the chief executives not the individuals doing their best 

 

hoping all is well for your brother and he soon gets a diagnosis and treatment plan 

 

User
Posted 25 Jul 2025 at 18:03

I hear what you are saying, but there are many professions that are under pressure and have suffered pay erosion. But they still maintain standards, it has long been a problem that the consultant system produces doctors with almost Godlike authority that do not stand being questioned.

My wife was a nurse and has many experiences of consultants who would not accept a desk being in the wrong place for their clinics or who would speak inappropriately about patients. 

We see endless examples of bad practice and incompetence in the NHS which cannot be excused by poor pay and conditions. It's poor management and oversight, which we as patients have to challenge rather than have it dealt with by the people who should be making sure that care is acceptable. For some it is their families who have to complain after a relatives death. 

The whole system needs root and branch reform, but it will be a brave government that takes this expensive and powerful bull by the horns, witness the current junior doctor strike. 

 

 

User
Posted 25 Jul 2025 at 20:03
They don’t though, the police and criminal justice system is in a state of collapse, as is education, individuals do their best but overall public services are failing badly. I’d sooner the NHS in this state than USA style system.

Doctors and nurses are vilified by the public when they’re doing their best in an under funded system too heavy with managers suffering pay erosion low morale and constant criticism, just like police, prosecutors teachers are.

The blame lies with successive governments.

I support the strike, as a patient we need doctors and that ridiculous imposed contract, Brexit austerity means they’re left, leaving , exhausted looking to leave. It’s sad.

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 09:41

Hi Mick,

Sorry to hear about this, the diagnosis process can be very frustrating. I think thatif the MDT has reviewed the biopsy results and decided they need more scans, they're being thorough. 

As for the secretary making a telephone call, I don't think it's unusual, I had calls from a bookings clerk regarding further appointments while I was still waiting on my results.

Good luck mate.

Kev. 

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 11:01
Hi kev,

It's just the complete lack of information that is scaring him to death.

I understand that admin staff can set up and inform about appointments etc.

And yes being thorough is exactly what you would expect.

But the result of the biopsy is obviously known to the medical team, something, anything would have been better than absolutely nothing.

I get that it's not unusual to delegate such tasks to admin staff, but that doesn't make it right.

And yes from a previous post, the whole system seems to be on its knees, not just the NHS. But someone has to take a hold on things and I don't see any party who has the ability to do so anywhere in sight.

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 14:41
It’s worse getting a result from a non qualified person, as they are completely unable to answer any questions. A secretary notifying he needs more scans infers unfortunately they are ruling in/out spread. A call like that would be a waste of a doctors time, that time is best used contacting patients like your brother once they have all the results, to explain the situation and next steps.

Waiting is awfully stressful, but it’s good they’re being thorough and he’s aware that he needs further tests and they’re in hand. He will soon know what’s what. Best of luck to your brother.

We have to sadly accept that doctors are stretched and hope that they’re managing to deal with all patients in order of need the same as we are expected to accept police don’t attend shoplifts or minor criminal damage or car thefts etc and there are more out of court disposals as there just isn’t the capacity.

Anyway I don’t want to get too political so good luck going forward keep us posted.

User
Posted 26 Jul 2025 at 19:45

Everything is politics unfortunately.  And there are things that our government have no control over such as Trumps erratic manner of conducting business. 

Thank you for wishing my brother well, I truly hope the news won't be too bad. 

He only had a PSA test following on from mine. I was 4.8 and his was 84.

I'm hoping that his positive diagnosis does not impact on me because of the family link. Fingers crossed. 

Mick 

User
Posted 27 Jul 2025 at 16:35

Hi Mick

i feel your frustration- the waiting and not knowing is horrible.

have you thought of making a subject access request for the results. I do this for every test that my husband has. I feel bad that I am wasting someone’s time but it gets us the results quickly and I feel we are both intelligent enough to interpret the reports. I know this means that you do not have an expert opinion of your test results at the same time but, sadly, for whatever reason, the system is too broken to provide an adequate level of care.

 

hope you get some answers soon

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 00:43

Hi Mags.

When I had my tests I asked for any and all results and reports and they just gave me what they wanted to. Then I'd have to make another request. They said they had to consider each application so any thoughts I had of being able to access my own medical records freely was firmly put to bed. Not exactly what I thought. 

I didn't want a doctor to have to talk me through each test result but actually being told the result would have been better. But both my brother and I have been just told to turn up for the next appointment with no explanation available.  There are many who go through the same poor care at a time when they need some clarity. 

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 09:55

Hi Mick

I can honestly say the level of care my husband has had has been shockingly bad to the point that I tell everyone, we are alone on this cancer journey and nobody seems to care.

my husbands cancer is terminal and he is just on his 9th round of chemotherapy re challenge, had been hospitalised the last 3 cycles and still we can’t see a consultant. After a battle, we have been given a telephone appointment for September!

making a subject access request has genuinely been the only source of information for us.

i don’t ask for information, i go onto the MSA SARs website and formally request information.

so for a biopsy report I would request exactly that, providing the date of the biopsy on where your brother had it. 

obviously he would need to make the request (think you can do it in someone’s behalf with their consent).

Hope you get some answers - it’s your information and you have a right to access it.

Mags

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 12:01
Apparently, there has been a surge in the number of men wanting PSA tests following publicity about PCa raised by celebs and even former PM Sunak, which is good but will result in an increase in tests and treatment, so will occasion further delays. The situation is also made worse by Resident (formerly called Junior doctors), going on strike, and impacting the NHS as a whole. Like some others, regardless of what they received prior to Covid, the UK can't afford to pay everybody so well now. To do so, the Government would have to print money which leads to devaluation of the pound and things costing more. The resident doctors in the UK do better than their counterparts in France and Italy and are not far behind Germany. Labour gave them an increase more than anybody else when they came to power and a further increase has been offered. It's totally unrealistic that they get yet another twenty something per cent increase for which they are asking. I read that in their first year a Resident doctor who is just starting gets more money than a trained fireman of 2 years who risks his life attending fires. Whilst the public was previously in favour of giving these doctors a generous rise and did so, polls are now showing that they are not sympathetic this time. I suggest people read the BMI standard basic scales to which payments for extra hours and unsociable hours has to be added plus London Weighting where appropriate.
Barry
User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 16:20
A newly qualified doctor earns around £36000, after five or six years of med school, thousands spent on exams and around £90000 student debt. They work well over their hours probably averaging at less than minimum wage. On graduating they’re sent all around the country for foundation training so still incurring rental costs and being away from family and friends. They can’t chose their trust.

They on completion of two years foundation training chose a specialism and have to pay over the next ten years or more depending on their specialism tens of thousands for exams to progress, professional college memberships and their own liability insurance. It can take 12 years to become a consultant in some specialisms.

They get vilified by the public so who can blame them for clearing off to Canada or Australia where they work less hours for more money and even get a lunch break.

Wes Streeting is talking of scrapping their debt - which is divisive- just pay them commensurate to knowledge responsibility and experience. It’s really not much to ask. They find money for HS2 and vanity projects and wars after all.

They might not run into burning buildings if required maybe a few times a year like a firefighter but they save thousands of lives and improve quality of life of tens of thousands more over their career, if there’s enough of them.

A firefighter trainee earns around £28000 no uni debt. They do risk their lives for others but it’s comparing apples and pears.

I don’t think pay restoration is unreasonable, resident doctors suffered the biggest pay erosion across all public sector.

The country is in a mess, but if we want to encourage new doctors to train, and older doctors to remain I don’t believe we can afford not to pay them as it’s us the public that suffer.

GP is extremely underfunded compared to hospitals and it’s hard to attract new trainee GP. The previous government refused to talk with dictums, imposed a disasterous contract and rather than deal with the situation brought in physician associates. They aren’t doctors though get paid very well for having a fraction of the knowledge seeing half as many patients and rightly limited in scope. Who suffers …. Patients. It’s short sighted and costly to have PA not doctors, and there are GP that can’t get jobs because they use PAs and surgeons whose training is slowed as they use the surgical equivalent of a PA.

We suffer delays and waits and it’s horrendous but I don’t blame the over worked underpaid doctors I blame austerity and the court of public opinion.

Once we have an insurance based system which I don’t see being far off we will all wish we’d found the money for pay restoration, that would attract and retain doctors and ensure restoration of good quality care for us all.

As you can see I feel really strongly about the NHS so none of us suffer these delays and uncertainty and all get access to better care.

Best wishes to all in this stressful journey. 😊

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 18:14

Without wanting  to change this is into Question Time. In my opinion we've simply.not kept up.with the times.

When the NHS was first conceived it was workable. A higher percetsge of the population were working and paying into the system. There were less retired pensioners and people weren't living so long.

That system has now been turned on it's head. It"s no longer affordable or sustainable.

I don't have a problem with what anyone in the NHS earns, but on the last couple of occasions when I've visited GPs, in my presence they've used Google. That's why for most ailments I do the same, it cuts out the middle man. 😁

Edited by member 28 Jul 2025 at 20:37  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 18:20

Turkey.

You make some incredibly valid points, the money our government sees fit to throw at things like HS2, foreign wars, aid that goes to the wrong place, PPE that goes to landfill etc etc is staggering and almost criminal. 

Simply hosting the orange buffoon that is Donald Trump is money we could spend much more effectively elsewhere. 

The health service was set up to provide a level of care not previously seen and out of reach of working class folk. But it has become perverted to provide unnecessary "Health care" and to mend a level of self abuse by a population that has way too much compared to the post war austerity in which it was born.

People were fitter, lighter and healthier back then. Before widespread use of drugs was even possible, when they ate food that was basic but better for them and when they walked more than they ride around in cars, or indeed mobility scooters which are now just a motorised shopping trolley for many (i know i know there are genuine reasons for using such a device but really? Some of the folk you see on them would be better off walking).

It's not simply the lack of money or wages or whatever that has broken the health service or the police, or ambulance or fire service.  It is us, the Great British public, with access to mobile phones and the Internet we overload services that could never cope with the sheer volume of rubbish that modern life generates. As a cop I saw the world change from BC (before cell phones) to AD always demanding. 

I always said my first job as health secretary would be to put large bouncers on every A&E reception instead of triage nurses;

"You fell at work and injured your knee? Please come in and we will have someone to you shortly"

"You got drunk, took drugs, tried to climb some scaffolding and fell off. And now you have a twisted ankle and want to sue not only the scaffolding firm but the alcohol company, drug supplier and probably the NHS too. On your way sunshine, we are not here for idiots like you"

Might sound harsh but the average A&E department wastes countless hours on people who feel so entitled they will not be told no. Whilst waiting for treatment to a work injury, I watched a man recently park his Audi in an ambulance bay, he spoke to the triage nurse explaining when he lifted his arm it hurt him. No he had not had an accident, no he did not know how this had happened,  no it wasn't an emergency, no it didn't stop him working or driving. It just hurt and he was here now so somebody damned well better see him as he had paid his taxes. I was within an ace of stepping up to this privileged pile of nonsense and inviting him outdoors to generate injuries that would require the services of A&E. 

The country has gone soft and no amount of funding will cure this affliction, too much disposable income and a skewed sense of priorities, data poverty? Come on, thats not poverty just because you can't update your kids Facebook status. 

It's so easy to become political and blame the doctors, the government,  the austerity etc etc. But a lot comes back to the way we and others abuse the systems that once coped very well with the demand they were built to deal with. 

 

User
Posted 28 Jul 2025 at 20:26

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
A newly qualified doctor earns around £36000, after five or six years of med school, thousands spent on exams and around £90000 student debt. They work well over their hours probably averaging at less than minimum wage. On graduating they’re sent all around the country for foundation training so still incurring rental costs and being away from family and friends. They can’t chose their trust.

They on completion of two years foundation training chose a specialism and have to pay over the next ten years or more depending on their specialism tens of thousands for exams to progress, professional college memberships and their own liability insurance. It can take 12 years to become a consultant in some specialisms.


They get vilified by the public so who can blame them for clearing off to Canada or Australia where they work less hours for more money and even get a lunch break.

Wes Streeting is talking of scrapping their debt - which is divisive- just pay them commensurate to knowledge responsibility and experience. It’s really not much to ask. They find money for HS2 and vanity projects and wars after all.

They might not run into burning buildings if required maybe a few times a year like a firefighter but they save thousands of lives and improve quality of life of tens of thousands more over their career, if there’s enough of them.


A firefighter trainee earns around £28000 no uni debt. They do risk their lives for others but it’s comparing apples and pears.

I don’t think pay restoration is unreasonable, resident doctors suffered the biggest pay erosion across all public sector.

The country is in a mess, but if we want to encourage new doctors to train, and older doctors to remain I don’t believe we can afford not to pay them as it’s us the public that suffer.

GP is extremely underfunded compared to hospitals and it’s hard to attract new trainee GP. The previous government refused to talk with dictums, imposed a disasterous contract and rather than deal with the situation brought in physician associates. They aren’t doctors though get paid very well for having a fraction of the knowledge seeing half as many patients and rightly limited in scope. Who suffers …. Patients. It’s short sighted and costly to have PA not doctors, and there are GP that can’t get jobs because they use PAs and surgeons whose training is slowed as they use the surgical equivalent of a PA.

We suffer delays and waits and it’s horrendous but I don’t blame the over worked underpaid doctors I blame austerity and the court of public opinion.

Once we have an insurance based system which I don’t see being far off we will all wish we’d found the money for pay restoration, that would attract and retain doctors and ensure restoration of good quality care for us all.

As you can see I feel really strongly about the NHS so none of us suffer these delays and uncertainty and all get access to better care.

Best wishes to all in this stressful journey. 😊

Everybody would like pay restoration to pre-COVID levels but it is unaffordable in the UK and the Resident Doctors like their supporters just don't seem to understand it! There are people in the UK in many areas who could earn more by working abroad. I know an engineer who could work again in Australia for more money or indeed could work in Dubai for very much more.  He prefers to work for less in the UK for cultural and other advantages the UK provides for him and his family.  In the same way many Doctors come to the UK from India, Pakistan, and other countries because they can make more money here than in their countries of birth.  So trying to justify pay here with what doctors or any body else might get in another continent is not relevant.  We could borrow money but that would mean adding to the burden future generations will face and they will have to support a growing number of pensioners anyway.  Would you tax the rich more and precipitate them leaving in droves as the Chancellor is finding out?  Already there are many depending on 'Food Banks' and in relative poverty and you can't increase tax on them.

The situation has now been made more difficult by Trump's tariffs and the UK needing with other European Countries to spend more on defence as the USA require us to do.

Doctors do pretty well.  Figures provided by the BMA for Doctors in training before 2025 pay award announced on 22nd May 2025 show a basic pay of £36,616 for grade FY1 Nodal point 1 to £70,425 for SD-8. Resident doctors in the UK are eligible for overtime pay for hours worked beyond their contracted 40 hour week. They also receive additional payments for nights, weekends and on-call work.  Night shifts provide 37% enhanced pay. Doctors pay tuition fees for their Undergraduate Medical Degrees but from the 5th year on UK students can get their tuition fees covered by a NHS bursary.  Eventually, a GP can make circa £140,000 basic plus add ons.  Doctors also get a a good defined pension.  It's small beer when compared with what a Premier League footballers get for kicking a bit of inflated plastic on a pitch but reflects the twisted values of society as some would see it.  

Barry
 
Forum Jump  
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK