Definitely worth getting a few different opinions , I would also (if you don’t already know ) be asking size of tumour and where it is positioned , what is the percentage of the pattern 4
one thing I found that also seems to be overlooked is the quality of the scan , as I mention earlier in the thread I was also 3+4 and was told that active surveillance was an option for me but I was also being told that my MRI scan could have been clearer
I paid for another MRI, this time a MPMRI with contrast on a more advanced scanner , the results from that showed tumour was larger than previously advised although it could have grown and was closer to the edge, my decision for surgery was made after that and I’m glad I did as after surgery pathology showed that tumour was in fact much larger than both scans had shown, was indeed very close to the edge , it also showed the true percentage of pattern 4 , I was originally told this was less than 10% where infact it was nearer to 30% so the more aggressive buggers were 3 times higher than originally thought
im now over 3 weeks post op and all is going well , absolutely no regrets and it’s nice to wake up knowing it’s gone ( although still got PSA test in 5 weeks )
We are all different in regards to what our favoured treatment options are and it may be that AS is a good option for you but as above get as much information as you can before making a decision
All the best
Nick