The support and advice on this forum never fails to amaze me. Thank you all.
It’s reassuring to hear this is a reasonably well‑trodden treatment option, at least in certain cases. Barry and Dave, I agree this needs a discussion with my oncologist, although I’m increasingly comfortable proceeding even if they’re not entirely on board, provided the evidence supports it. I’ve disagreed with my onco before after excellent advice here and a second opinion from the Royal Marsden on metastasis‑directed RT which has so far delivered good results. That said, I value their input hugely and we have a strong relationship.
Dave, I know my team would be open to discussing approaches like intermittent hormone therapy, but I agree it wouldn’t be initiated by them, I’d need to make the case. As with my self‑funded PSMA PETs and RT to all tumour burden, there seems to be a level of self‑advocacy required that I haven’t seen elsewhere in the health system. I’m not sure whether that’s locality‑specific.
Jules, I imagine the Prostap break would be for as long as is safe, whatever that turns out to be. I’m not sure how long people typically stay off ADT before PSA rises. My concern is the long‑term effects: bone health is fine for now, but cholesterol has crept up, and I know there are thyroid and diabetes risks too. The fatigue is a challenge but equally if I were told I had to deal with it I would. I’d be comfortable with monthly PSA checks if recommended, the GP surgery is on my route to work. I try, where possible, to make this disease fit around my life rather than the other way round, probably a control thing.
Thanks Adrian for your kind words and for the video link, I’ll watch it with my wife. I’ve found Dr Scholz’s videos extremely helpful in past treatment decisions.
Crispin, I’m currently on Prostap only. Bicalutamide was used briefly at diagnosis to put the brakes on. I was offered a second‑generation hormone post chemo/radiotherapy, but we agreed to keep it in reserve. I know some advocate adding Enza or Abi alongside Prostap, and I think I’d be eligible. I hope you reach a decision on Decapeptyl. I completely understand why oncos in England, Germany, or France would worry about fuelling micromet growth, even with a low PSA. For us as patients, getting as close as possible to normal quality of life, reducing medication where safely possible, and carefully balancing risk while avoiding spread feels like the dream scenario.
Andy, thanks, perhaps 10 months of low PSA isn’t considered long enough. Relugolix is interesting; I wasn’t aware it could speed testosterone recovery. Agree that defining an upper PSA limit with my onco would be essential. Any rise would horrify me, but I’d have to get past that if I pursue this route. My presenting PSA was 31, and I’m 46 years old. The fact that this approach doesn’t seem to impact overall survival is probably why it appeals to me.
Well Onco phone call next week, will update on progress with this. Thanks again all.