Hello,
I asked ChatGPT about some of the things said in this forum, and life is not quite so straightforward when you look at the outcomes of the various trials.
As far as I can learn, when prescribing an ARI (such as enzalutamide) for metastatic prostate cancer, the EAU guidelines state that ADT (such as Decapeptyl) should be prescribed as well. So testosterone is reduced to castration level and the cancer cells also have the androgen receptor blocked — essentially a double strategy.
I wanted to remain on enzalutamide but stop the Decapeptyl, as I have a severe lack of energy which I believe is largely due to the Decapeptyl. This regime is not the standard recommendation in Europe, so my oncologist was very against the suggestion.
However, I have an email from the German professor who gave me the 177Lu-PSMA therapy strongly suggesting that the Decapeptyl should be given a holiday, while the enzalutamide should continue at 80 mg/day (instead of the usual 160 mg/day). My oncologist eventually agreed.
I am now having PSA and testosterone measured every three months. Currently my PSA is <0.01 ng/mL. After more than a year on Decapeptyl my testosterone will have been at castration level, but it will now be interesting to see how quickly it recovers after stopping it — and, most importantly, what happens to the PSA as it does - and of course on my energy levels.
It is not clear to me exactly how strong the evidence is for always combining ADT and an ARI, but certainly I think oncologists are much more comfortable following the established guidelines than taking an alternative path.
Stay strong and keep this thread going.
Crispin