My husband has been on the ivermectin menbezadole and metaformin regime for over four years. His original diagnosis was Gleason 9 Tb3 eleven years ago and he was diagnosed stage four just over four years ago when hisPSA went up, he had lymph node involvement. This was when we looked in to the ivermectin, menbezadole metformin regime.
His PSA is now <0.1this is undetectable, and has been forover three years, he is no longer on the Prostap or any other mainstream medication, he was offered apalutamide but refused it ( look up the cost of it)
The article francij1 posted is worth reading and there is plenty of good information available.
We are both what is seen as reasonably intelligent and both formally educated to a degree level and above, though I question whether intelligence and education are the same thing.
I’m happy with people thinking his regime is poppycock, and the grey matter between my ears does an excellent job. We are both in our 70’s have an excellent quality of life and live very active lives, just look at the side effects of apalutamide and Prostap.
I find the post by jfd quite unfortunate and rather offensive but very common.
Yes, science has it place, as does modern medicine. Look at thalidomide and how it was a wonder drug to help women., and how many years before it was discontinued and then how long before pharmaceutical companies acknowledged it’s appalling failure.
We have friends who are clinicians who fully support David’s programme, and have a private oncologist who supplies us with his ‘ alternative medication’ David also takes Turkey Tail vitamin d vitamin b12 vitamin k and a number of other supplements.
Please be careful about criticising and running down a regime as it has not been researched by pharmaceutical companies as they clearly have to make a profit, and these off label drugs are off patent and considerably cheaper, maybe this is why funding is limited
As David was stage 4 he decided it was worth a punt and worth spending time looking into it in depth, and so far we are not disappointed, but never complacent or big headed.
David does not reject mainstream medication and sees its value, but also he is prepared to look at alternatives, he would consider going back on to Prostap if his PSA increased alongside his off label alternative, after discussion with his private oncologist.
I'm aware not many people have undertaken the reading and research we have and his choices were not undertaken lightly or without lots of consultation and discussion with his private medic.
l look forward to comments.
Thank-you for reading this if you have.
Leila
Edited by member 07 Jul 2026 at 18:48
| Reason: Not specified