Notification

Error

AS Active Surveillance

User
Posted 30 Aug 2026 at 17:38

I Have just stopped treatment and am on AS.

Anyone else in this position and looking for more than just one MRI and 3/4 PSA tests per annum which I find to be passive rather than active.

Specifically: any one getting more than this or with experience of paying for MRI's or Blood tests?

Love to interact with anyone else on the same path.

User
Posted 30 Aug 2026 at 19:42
You say you have just stopped treatment, was this RT and why did you stop to favour AS? I've been on AS for the past four years and can tell you that PSA tests every three/four months in the first year or so and annual MRI scans are more than adequate to monitor your 3+4 prostate cancer. Of course, if you want a scan more frequently it's absolutely possible to pay for one privately, but that should only be necessary if your PSA tests show a rising trend and you'd get it on the NHS.
User
Posted 30 Aug 2026 at 20:30

Long story but In the end at nearly 80 I was unwilling to follow the treatment path offered. ADT, TURPS, Radiotherapy, and was not accepted for focal treatment elsewhere. As far as I was concerned the risks outweighed the benefits. I want to stay healthy, look after my wife, enjoy the family and have a good quality of life in my remaining years. If it was just the RT and I was younger I may have had RT alone as my two younger brothers have. But the stats show that RT, prostatectomy and 'do nothing' have virtually the same life expectancy, but do nothing does not have the risk of poor outcomes from treatment let alone having TURPS as well (which did not go well for my father 25 years ago).

In addition to this they started me on ADT. It was horrendous especially the depression and I had all the other symptoms expected. I am still not sleeping properly and am having cramps and problems with my arms and legs. I pray these abate as time goes by.

I am attempting adjunctive treatment to slow the progress of the PC and I want to see if I am succeeding but there is little support for this either inside or outside of the NHS here in the UK. I have had two MRI's (not sure why) but I will want to see if my lesions are stable or progressing in the future in order to assess the effectiveness of what I am doing.

I would love to hear that your PC has remained stable and encapsulated.

Edited by member 30 Aug 2026 at 20:35  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 30 Aug 2026 at 22:07

It would be useful to know what your diagnosis is.

Your treatment would be Watchful Waiting, not Active Surveillance. Active Surveillance is not something you can stay on if you need treatment to prevent progression. Watchful Waiting is what you are on if you decide not to have treatment (or can't have treatment for other reasons), but still want some monitoring and treatment of symptoms if they crop up, and the option to have treatment in the future if things change.

Something you might consider would be to go on to just Bicalutamide as a hormone therapy. That has fewer side effects then the full hormone therapies (injections or Relugolix). Also, it's bone strengthening (when used by itself) rather than bone weakening. It will also shrink your prostate, possibly removing the need for a TURP. The down side is that it doesn't work for as long as injections or Relugolix, and you probably also want to be on a low dose of Tamoxifen to prevent the Bicaluatanide causing breast gland pain/sensitivity and growth.

It would be nice if Enzalutamide, Darolutamide, and Apalutamide could be made available by themselves. Enzalutamide has been trialed and works well, the others haven't been trialed this way yet as far as I know, but none are licenced for use in this way in the UK. They would work for much longer than Bicalutamide, and Darolutamide, being too large a molecule to pass through the blood/brain barrier, might have even fewer side effects (but might also struggle to get through the blood/prostate barrier, so that specifically would need testing). These would also need the low dose Tamoxifen.

User
Posted 30 Aug 2026 at 22:35
Hi,

If you could provide details concerning your Diagnosis and histology it would be helpful.

I can understand your reasoning for not wanting HT because of the side effects but am not sure whether you have asked whether you could just have the RT or want it if offered. Either way, your having an MRI once a year and PSA test 3 or 4 times a year is pretty standard. Should PSA begin to increase in the interim, you will most likely be invited to have the MRI brought forward. You can of course have a PSA done privately, although it is said to be more relevant if done by the same lab as your other PSA's. Likewise, you can pay for an-additional MRI scan. (A multi parametric one is better).

You say that you are having adjunctive treatment but not ADT now. So is this some non medically approved herb or what?

Barry
User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 09:20
Thanks Tteedd for your further information and I fully understand your concerns. Here's my story so far. Four years ago at the age of 74 I was diagnosed with prostate cancer after raised PSA levels of 10.93 (March) and 8.89 (April) and an MRI scan score of Likert 3 showing a suspicious 14mm lesion and a very large prostate of 94cc accounting for much of the relatively high PSA levels.

The TP biopsy found 5 out of 25 cores containing up to 20% involvement cancer including two small areas of Gleason 3+3 and a lesion on the other side (not the one apparently shown on MRI which was almost certainly BHP) so actually T2c but all well contained within the gland.

The pathology report at my local hospital was quite equivocal about this using phrases such as "markedly fragmented" and "difficult to assess" and "best regarded as 3+4" and I was offered a choice between RT with many months of HT and a TURP or prostatectomy (not brachytherapy because my prostate is too large) neither of which I found attractive and I definitely wanted to avoid treatment! (I also investigated HIFU and found I was eligible privately and this would be my choice of treatment if necessary).

So I privately obtained a second opinion on the biopsy slides at The Christie in Manchester. Here the reviewing pathologist told my consultant he was very confident there was only minimal pattern 4 content in the lesion, ie less than 5%, so it could be "best regarded" as Gleason 3+3 and the Manchester Prostate MDT agreed and recommended active surveillance as the first-line option.

Further MRI scans in 2023 and 2024 showed "no change" in the prostate and at the latest last November it was downgraded to PI-RADS 2 and a score of PRECISE 2. During that time my PSA levels have been fairly stable with fluctuations between 9 and 11 but with spikes of 15.3 and 16.5 due to UTIs at the time. So I'm happy to continue with AS at the moment.

It's true to say that age and life expectancy play a significant part in any decisions about low and intermediate localised prostate cancer which is generally slow-growing and no doubt you've heard the expression you are more likely to die with prostate cancer than because of it! Hope that's helpful. Cheers, Julian

User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 10:01

Quick synopsis for Barry & Andy:

BHP for many years. Well controlled by Fenasteride. 

Family history of PC hence regular PSA's up to 3.5 variable but dropped to 1.9 on fenasteride.

MRI 2020 reported as negative but now know it was Prads 2.

Double of PSA Jan 2026 2.x to 4.x. MRI lesion 7mm Prads 5. (position reported differently by different oncologists)

Biopsy Gleason 3+4 

Plan as decided by Oncologist ADT, Turps, RT

Further MRI May

Opted to seek focal treatment at UCLH. Turned down when their radiologist found Bilateral lesions (on the original scans!). UCLH recommended - original treatment or AS.

Due to misdiagnosis in report to UCLH (T3 as opposed to T2) I was scared silly and started complimentary treatment designed to stop metastasis.

As stated I was already unwilling to have both TURPs and RT (my father was in a bad way after TURPS 25 yrs ago) due to the combined risks of poor outcomes. My horrendous experience on ADT put the cap on it. I opted for AS. Oncologist No 1 not happy.

Treatment; see Intellectual medicine (You tube). There is no doubt that I would put myself under Dr Petteruti or one of his associates if I lived in the US and had medical insurance. As it is I take his vitality capsules and follow some of his re-purposed medication routes. I am prepared to push harder in some areas of his protocol.

I used the 16/8 diet to loose weight as soon as I had my diagnosis. I have dropped 2 stone. I believed it necessary. Being on this led to the discovery that many believe in fasting in order to let you body recover and go into autophagy mode where there is more chance that Killer T cells can at least reduce metastasis. I have stayed on the 16/8 diet and have to eat more to maintain my body weight. I walk, I exercise, I swim and play golf.

Though dieting I came across the work of Dr Thomas Seyfried (Biologist). I believe him to be correct in his metabolic theory of cancer. It supports my dieting and I would be prepared to join one of the trials if I lived in the US. As it is I keep my body sugar to the minimum, hopefully along with insulin and inflammation levels.

I'm not sure I should go deeper into what actual medications I am taking on this site. But I am still seeking a complimentary practitioner in the UK to give me the guidance I need prescriptions I cannot obtain and, in any case, I do need more frequent MRI's to know of any changes before I change treatments and blood tests to ensure that I am not harming myself.

I took a break to go swimming during writing this (which turns out to be anything like short!) and find my history to be remarkably similar to Julians!).

Good luck and I hope this is useful. It is my experience and I am not recommending any action other than keeping your eyes wide open.

Ted

User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 10:59

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
 So I'm happy to continue with AS at the moment.

Hi Julian.

I don't want to divert the conversation, but felt the need to say,  how very refreshing it is to see someone on this site being postive about active surveillance. There is a bias against the treatment on here. This is probably due to the site inheritently focusing on poor outcomes. On top of this, most men who've found AS successful, will never have joined the forum, they will be getting on with their lives virtually unscathed by the disease.

AS is often portrayed as 'kicking the can along the road' Yet it's been shown, for many on it with low grade cancer, it can avoid them having radical treatment for many years or all their lives.

Here's a very recent video on AS.

https://youtu.be/Ovx13jqD3EY?is=vk_33A_VxiPL-wpm

There is just ONE other bloke on here who recently posted that he'd been on AS for 10 years and never needed further treatment. 

Good luck on your AS journey and please keep us updated.

Edited by member 31 Aug 2026 at 11:14  | Reason: Add link

User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 10:59
Hi Ted

I can see you've done an enormous amount of research to find your own path that you're comfortable with.

As you say, if I lived in the US, the fact is you don't.

Some have bad reactions to ADT. Some don't.

From what I saw at the RT sessions my husband went to quite a lot are getting on fine with the occasional sweats.

Husband's PSA was 7.5 is now >0.01

I've researched an enormous amount too. Mostly how to mitigate side effects and keep as healthy as possible. Mark Schulz has some excellent YouTube videos on this.

Like you, husband's father had PC about 30 years ago and the RT left his with a few side effects, mainly to his bowels. Even so he lived an active life until he died at 93.

RT has moved on a great deal since then. It is far more accurate and covers a smaller more targeted area.

And one side effect of ADT I'm sure on most mens minds ... our sex life. I'm not going into details but it's always been wonderful and still is .If this side of ADT worries anyone please message me. There is a lot of information out there. Maintaining a happy life is good for mental health for both of us

User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 11:55

Many thanks for your comments Adrian which are much appreciated. We've previously had contact from time to time in other threads and I'm aware of your positive opinion on AS even though it wasn't successful in your own case. I also want to say how impressed I've been with the extensive advice/comments you have selflessly provided to many hundreds of men and their loved ones on this forum over the years. I watched the video you mentioned and have to say that while it's rather technical for non-medical viewers I was able to take away some re-assuring points. Cheers, Julian

Edited by member 31 Aug 2026 at 11:56  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 13:44
Hi Ted,

Clearly you have done your research but have opted for a non standard treatment path. I think it highly unlikely that you will get more than one MRI a year on the NHS, so you will have to take this into consideration. The cost can vary and increase if contrast is used and if the MRI is multiparametric, also where the scan is done geographically. I shopped around for my PSMA scan (It was hard to get it on the NHS at the time) and found the Paul Strickland Scanner Centre less expensive than the few major hospitals that did it. It is located in the Grounds of Mount Vernon Hospital so maybe worth a call if fairly near you. You may be aware that questions have been raised about many repeat MRI scans if the Gadlinolium contrast is used due to toxicity and I don't know whether a definitive answer has been given on this concern as yet.

Restricting intake of sugar and salt, and reducing excess weight along with increased exercise and sensible diet are all healthy things in any case. As to complementary medicine, this has been raised about four or five times in the 18 or so years I have been a member of this Charity. The general opinion has been that the benefits had not been proven and if there were any, why had they not been adopted by the NHS? It was said that anybody taking complimentary medication should mention it to their doctor as this could affect their standard medication.

Hope your regime works well for you.

Barry
User
Posted 31 Aug 2026 at 22:46

Hi Barry. You have to separate the wheat from the chaff. There are lots of alternative paths out there some have no scientific validity at all and must be discarded but not all. But I started this conversation hoping for a positive discourse between people choosing active surveillance. So I am not going to retort about the deficiencies of the standard path. That can be done elsewhere I am more interested in positive experiences. Dr Petteruti's Vitality programme has the advantage that he has done much of the separating the wheat from the chaff even if one is not in a position to join his programme. I'm also hoping that I may have found a clinician that can guide me in the sequencing of this 'wheat' (these drugs and procedures) and perhaps obtain the prescription drugs denied the individual by the system. If I succeed I will report it as much as I can to others like me here.

I have had some unethical suggestions about how to manipulate your PSA's to gain extra MRI's but I am budgeting for two paid ones and one NHS one per annum but if I can keep things stable (I am not hoping for more) I may well drop back to the one per year.

Thanks very much for the comment about the Paul Strickland Centre. It is in fact not at all far from here. Mount Vernon is where I would have gone for RT (and might still do so should I fail in my quest). My investigations give me great hope that I can at least delay the progress of the PC. I'm a bit younger than you but at nearly 80 I only hope for another 15 years and I want the majority of them to be without the problems created by the standard treatment.

I also have the feeling that we will see improvements to the standard path in the next few years so any extra time before treatment (if that should be all that is achieved) could be valuable. 

I allowed contrast for my second scan as I wrongly assumed it was ordered to give a better picture when considering focal treatment. I still want to protect my brain so I will refuse it in future.

I met another chap like you who has had success from the current system at a meeting in London last week. He had a prostatectomy 10 yrs ago and has not incurred a 'chemical' recurrence. I am pleased for him and you, but there are thousands suffering from side effects who then have to deal with this blow.

Finally. In removing myself from the proposed path I am no longer receiving any standard medication but yes should I go back on the standard path I will attempt to inform them (I have already had one case of not wanting to know). I'm hoping however not to need to.

Good luck everyone no matter what path they choose.

Ted

 
Forum Jump  
©2026 Prostate Cancer UK