Notification

Error

Proton Beam or Radiotherapy

User
Posted 01 Sep 2026 at 13:45

Hi I’ve been looking into Proton beam therapy as an alternative to Tadiotherapy and can’t get an answer?

My Hospital won’t discuss it at all because NHS don’t do it and if you ask private care are they saying it’s better just to make the sale ?

I’m looking for the best chance of quality of life as well as survival 

thanks 

User
Posted 02 Sep 2026 at 03:39

Hi, Steve.

I'm sorry that you've joined 'The Prostate Cancer Club.', but welcome to the forum.

Here's part of what they NHS say on proton beam therapy

Proton beam therapy is only suitable for certain types of cancer, such as highly complex brain, head and neck cancers and sarcomas. It does not lead to better outcomes for most cancer cases compared to using modern high energy x-rays, which is still considered the most appropriate and effective treatment for the majority of cancers.

https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/highly-spec-services/pbt/

As far as I can recall I believe there has just been one bloke on here, in the past three years, who mentioned proton beam treatment and that was done abroad?

User
Posted 02 Sep 2026 at 06:54

Hi thanks yeah I was looking abroad 

it’s a lot of money but wanted to maintain as much of myself as possible as the hospital only gave me negatives regarding radiotherapy 

User
Posted 02 Sep 2026 at 10:27

Back when the private Rutherford Cancer Centres were running in the UK, we had a talk from a local oncologist. He had been sending private patients who wanted proton beam to them, but had stopped doing so, because the results were not as good as standard (IG-VMAT) external beam radiotherapy. He wasn't very specific but said this was in terms of both worse outcomes and worse side effects. (The former Rutherford cancer centres have been bought and are now reopening, but they won't be operating the proton beam facilities, which probably also speaks volumes.)

The theory about proton being better due to the Bragg Peak effect (reduced entry wound and no exit wound) is all nice in theory, but the proton centres never completed any randomised control trials which demonstrated any benefit. (The US centres kept publishing papers showing how much better their proton beam was than much older non-IG IMRT external beam radiotherapy which we hadn't used in this country for years, but that had no validity for us here, and I doubt the US was still using non-IG IMRT external beam either.) NHS looked at the results of many international proton centres in 2016 to decide if they should offer it for prostate cancer, and also found the results in terms of serious side effects worse than the then latest standard external beam radiotherapy in use in the UK, so the NHS decided not to offer if for prostate.

It did strike me that proton could have been good for salvage treatments - zapping the odd lymph node or bone met, but the proton centres were never interested in that - they wanted the high volume bog-standard treatments which were more profitable. With standard LINACs now also doing SABR, SABR has taken the salvage treatments.

Proton is excellent for many other rare cancers, but it's never proved itself superior for prostate cancer.

User
Posted 02 Sep 2026 at 14:54

Thanks for that 

very informative and much appreciated 

These clinics in Europe do claim it’s less invasive with fewer side effects but they are a business I suppose 

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 03:33

Steve, you're G9, though you haven't given any other details of your diagnosis and those could be critical to deciding your treatment. 

While it might be tempting to go for the least challenging treatment first up, that's probably not going to be the best long term. Your first  treatment is your best chance to get rid of the cancer and keep it away for many years.

I can't imagine why a hospital would only give you negatives about radiotherapy when it's a good option and sometimes the best option.

Sometimes with older patients [I'm 79 and had RT/hormone therapy for a G9 cancer about 5 years ago] there's a risk that they'll suggest hormone therapy or factor in the thought that "at your age" the treatment isn't quite so important.

Andy's advice is always good.

Jules

 

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 07:07

Thanks what I mean by the hospital being negative I mean with regards to the side effects as in they said I probably would have ED and might never get it back

I am 61 and still want some quality of life have a younger partner and I was concerned that the hospital weren’t very encouraging 

I know they give the worst case scenario’s incase you go back and complain about them saying otherwise 

my cancer has not spread to the bones and are treating it as curable 

I am on Relugolix tablets initially then radiotherapy 

maybe on hearing it’s curable  I concentrated on the side effects

sorry this is all new to me and hard not to be overwhelmed it’s early days and just don’t want to get treatment choices wrong and regret it 

I appreciate your response 

 

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 08:53

Hi Steve,

You're right it can be very overwhelming, you get told you have cancer, then there's the realisation of all the side effects associated with the various treatments.

If it helps, I chose the RT/HT route plus brachytherapy which I was offered in addition last minute so extra radiation. I was offered surgery but told it would be none nerve sparing and would very likely require salvage RT later so that was a definite no for me!

I've not had any incontinence or urgency for the toilet and so far the only ED is a result of the HT which will hopefully wear off once my testosterone returns. I do also have a slightly reduced wee flow, starts of fine but kinda trails of a bit towards the end. It doesn't bother me, and I've been prescribed a daily pill of tamsulosin which helps too

Erections are still possible but I'm less enthusiastic about them due to lack of libido. It would be worth asking about tadalafil, it's like viagra, but you take a small daily dose to help maintain blood flow and avoid atrophy. Also a vacuum pump can help to avoid atrophy too as you'll find you no longer get night time erections. Both are available on the NHS. ED can develop over time due to radiation, but isn't guaranteed.

Keeping active also helps, I joined a cross fit club after a feebie 12 week course through Battle Cancer, something I would have ever considered doing prior to all this, it's surprisingly good fun!

Hopefully my message is reassuring rather than adding extra fear! 

I was diagnosed aged 48 (T3b Gleason 3+4) and have just finished my 2 years on HT, feeling positive about the future.

All the best John

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 09:22

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Thanks what I mean by the hospital being negative I mean with regards to the side effects as in they said I probably would have ED and might never get it back

The usual complaint is that they didn't warn us enough about side effects. 🙂

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
sorry this is all new to me and hard not to be overwhelmed it’s early days and just don’t want to get treatment choices wrong and regret it 

No need to apologise, mate. We all know how confusing and upsetting it can be getting a cancer diagnosis. I was about the same age as you when first diagnosed with PCa. My wife was a lot younger than me. I ended up Gleason 9(4+5) and had non nerve sparing surgery, which has basically left me impotent, apart from when I use penile injections. We've both adapted to the change of circumstances.

Sometimes it frustrating that our lives have been affected but the alternative of not being diagnosed and treated are very much worse.

Please keep us updated and good luck to you both.👍

Edited by member 03 Sep 2026 at 09:29  | Reason: Spelling

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 11:38

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Thanks what I mean by the hospital being negative I mean with regards to the side effects as in they said I probably would have ED and might never get it back

There's a risk of ED with any treatment (and also with Active Surveillance). Generally speaking, it's highest with surgery (and even higher with surgery followed by salvage radiotherapy). However, there are things about your anatomy and the location of your cancer which can significantly sway that. It's certainly not zero with radiotherapy either.

I can't see that you've mentioned your diagnosis other than Gleason. It might be useful to know staging and PSA. It might be that a treatment such as HDR Boost (50% dose of High Dose Rate Brachytherapy plus about 60% dose of external beam) could be a good fit. [Disclosure] it's what I had, and it seems to have good results for high risk contained (up to T3b) disease in terms of outcomes and side effect profile considering how high a dose it gets into the known cancer.

When you speak with clinicians about treatments, make sure you are speaking with the clinician who does that treatment. You don't get useful information if you speak with a surgeon about radiotherapy, for example.

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 18:28

Thanks John that is reassuring 

I took 2 months off work(I work freelance ) not coz of any physical effects just mentally wasn’t right I took the test as a formality not expecting anything negative 
in that time I have gone to yoga and Pilates almost every day sometimes twice a day had hypnotherapy and have an open mind to anything that helps 

I only have sleep issues where I wake up every 2 hours for the toilet but was told that isn’t a side effect 
the ED is a worry I initially thought once the hormone tablets are done it will come back but hospital said it might not because radiotherapy can damage nerves which is why I am looking into the Proton Beam

i wasn’t offered the Brachytherapy 

I have got the pump(my GP wouldn’t give it to me) but they did prescribe the Viagra though to be honest that didn’t help fully

some of it my be in my head I know 

it’s a weird situation for any us to hand this just thrown at us 

 

User
Posted 03 Sep 2026 at 19:33

It is sad to hear that 

glad you are still finding options and that you have an understanding partner 

it’s not something we want as men so

i’m trying to hang onto whatever chances I have 

User
Posted 04 Sep 2026 at 07:21

My guess is that the Radford Centres closed because Proton Beam treatment there was very expensive. There was no other facility about that time offering Proton Beam treatment in the UK except for a low powered unit at Clatterbridge that had been open for many years but could only treat eyes. NHS Cycletrons were opened at the Christy in Manchester followed by the one at UCLH in London. I recall a leading consultant at the latter mentioning in passing that they had used Proton Beam for Prostate but had not elaborated, so I don't know whether was in a trial. I did investigate the possibility of having Proton Beam Treatment in the USA when diagnosed but it was wildly expensive. Oher facilities had spread in Germany and some other European Countries and there was one offering comparitively less expensive Proton Treatment in Prague, where the results for Prostate Cancer seemed rather mixed. Proton Beam for Tumours in the head had good results with Proton Beam and in theory should have done so for Prostate Cancer as nearly all the energy is deposited on the Tumour with little discipated on the way to the tumour where most is released and virtually nothing thereafter, the so called 'Bragg Peak'. (With Photon RT, damage is caused on the path to the tumour and after it, although minimised as muchj as possible). But notwithstanding this, Proton Beam does not seem to have the same effectivenes when it comes to Prostate Cancer. My combined treatment in Germany included 6 fractions each of 3 Gy of Carbon Ions which is similar to Proton Beam but has a far higher RBE. The other part consisted of 30 fractions each of 2 Gy of conventional IMRT. The only side effect was a slightly sore bottom, This was in a trial. The Marsdon considered my results very good. Protons can be given using a Cyclotron, whereas Carbon Ions require a Synchrotron, rather like this one in Heidelberg that can produce and treat with either, although a gantry is not always essential https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeApaY7ctMo

 

 

Edited by member 04 Sep 2026 at 07:40  | Reason: to highlight link

Barry
User
Posted 04 Sep 2026 at 08:16

I tried a few pills before any were prescribed to me, I found Viagra did nothing for me. The problem is it requires you to be turned on, which is difficult when you're in a constant state of worry and have you libido suppressed by HT!

The tadalafil is more to help maintain blood flow to that area rather making it look like you're very very please to meet everyone. It's maintenance, along with the pump, through the dark days of the HT .

If just EBRT is suitable to put you on a curative path that's great news. Brachytherapy is targeted but combined with EBRT very much ups the odds of ED. Mind you two years after my main treatment and whilst still on HT I am still able to perform so to speak, with a little help from the pump to get things going. Shall see what the future brings, the main thing is I'm still here, hopefully for a long time!

Well done on the yoga and Pilates, I'm sure keeping as fit as possible helps both physically and mentally

 

User
Posted 04 Sep 2026 at 14:51

Thanks John I have asked about tadalafil for the blood flow reason and my GP said I could have that or Viagra suppose I could buy it over the counter 

and Barry is correct Prague is cheaper but disappointing to hear of their success rates 

User
Posted 04 Sep 2026 at 16:16

I bought a few boxes of tadalafil from an online pharmacy (20mg tablets), not cheap. But they did have the bonus of having break lines in them so you can easily quarter them into 5mg doses

 

User
Posted 04 Sep 2026 at 17:26

Thanks John i’ll look into that 

User
Posted 06 Sep 2026 at 22:24

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

My guess is that the Radford Centres closed because Proton Beam treatment there was very expensive. There was no other facility about that time offering Proton Beam treatment in the UK except for a low powered unit at Clatterbridge that had been open for many years but could only treat eyes. NHS Cycletrons were opened at the Christy in Manchester followed by the one at UCLH in London. I recall a leading consultant at the latter mentioning in passing that they had used Proton Beam for Prostate but had not elaborated, so I don't know whether was in a trial.

When I last looked, Christie proton system didn't offer prostate cancer treatment, NHS or private.

UCLH doesn't but a private company Proton International does do it at UCLH.

I think the Rutherford Cancer Centres expected to pick up a lot of NHS work, but that mostly didn't happen (and none at all for Proton Beam as far as I know). I vaguely recall they did build a centre for one health authority, which took it over when they went bust, but that wasn't a proton beam centre - I think it was some outpatient cancer services. I suspect they also expected to pick up a significant volume of private proton prostate cancer treatments, and I don't know to what extent that happened, but I never came across anyone treated there except the one patient who used to go around giving talks about it.

Edited by member 07 Sep 2026 at 10:00  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 07:18

Professor Mark Emberton mentions that the UCLH Proton Centre was being used to treat Prostates in this interview at approx 11.27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kRTwBJ8ehY&t=1698s

Proton Partners which was renamed Ruthford Health in 2019, was liquidated in June 2022 shortly after the UCLH Proton Centre opened in March 2022, so notwithstanding what Professor Emberton said, few if any Prostate Cancers could have been done between these dates.

Edited by member 08 Sep 2026 at 17:48  | Reason: to highlight link

Barry
User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 09:21

Yeah thanks there is a place in Nottingham does it Genesis I think and London and also Bristol  

User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 09:43

Hi Andy,

SABR is not used for salvage treatments after prostatectomy according to myA oncolgist as I enquired.

He said 'you cant have that. you haven't got a prostate.'

Maybe if you have a area that lights up on a PET scan it might be different?

Regards

Al

 

 

User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 09:47

Hi Steve

 

PTB is available at UCH privately.

I don't know if its available on the NHS

Regards

Al

User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 10:09

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Proton Partners which was renamed Ruthford Health in 2019, was liquidated in June 2022 shortly after the UCLA Proton Centre opened in March 2022, so notwithstanding what Professor Emberton said, few if any Prostate Cancers could have been done between these dates.

Sorry, I used the wrong name (which I've corrected in the earlier post). It's Proton International which does the private work at UCLH.

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

PTB is available at UCH privately.

I don't know if its available on the NHS

The NHS doesn't offer Proton Beam treatment for Prostate Cancer. They investigated it and produced a paper in 2016 showing that it had worse side effects than the then-current IG-VMAT used in the UK. I'm not aware of any pressure to take another look since then.

I spoke with one of the oncologists at UCLH when the proton beam facility was just being finished off, and they were talking about doing a randomised control trial between proton beam and LINAC, but as far as I know, that never happened.

Edited by member 07 Sep 2026 at 10:21  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Sep 2026 at 10:17

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Hi Andy,

SABR is not used for salvage treatments after prostatectomy according to myA oncolgist as I enquired.

He said 'you cant have that. you haven't got a prostate.'

Maybe if you have a area that lights up on a PET scan it might be different?

SABR isn't used for prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (as far as I know).

However, it certainly is used for salvage radiotherapy outside of the prostate bed. Here's the NHS England commissioning document for it:

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with metachronous extracranial oligometastatic cancer

Not very impressed if your oncologist doesn't know this.

 
Forum Jump  
©2026 Prostate Cancer UK