I want to talk about my experience of the Local Anaesthetic Trans Perineal (LATP) prostate biopsy, having just experienced it firsthand.
Despite being in obvious severe pain, they just carried on, it was an utterly brutalising and distressing. The truly shocking aspect was that for the clinicians in that room, inflicting severe pain and distress on a patient seemed completely routine and of little/no consequence.
The fact is that LATP procedures can be responsible for significant levels of suffering, the clinical data backs this up. The large-scale TRANSLATE multicentre randomised controlled trial, published in The Lancet Oncology, shows that 38% of men find LATP biopsies painful and embarrassing. Furthermore, peer-reviewed registry data reveals that severe, agonizing pain (scoring over 7 out of 10) is reported by roughly 5.9% of men. I was unlucky enough to be in that 5.9%.
While the majority may tolerate it, a significant minority do not.
If you are a man in the UK being prepared for this procedure, your urologist may push you toward a conscious LATP. You must understand that this pathway is designed primarily for clinical convenience—and it carries a risk that you will suffer in that chair.
Before signing my consent form, I was fed sanitised, well-rehearsed scripts: “well tolerated,” “brief discomfort,” “like an injection at the dentist.” No clinician was honest or forthcoming about the group of men who do not experience it this way. There was zero discussion about alternatives such as sedation.
By sanitizing the language, it avoids a critical truth: for a certain cohort of men, LATP is not "uncomfortable"—it is deeply traumatic. When urologists refuse to validate this, they deny men the ability to give truly informed consent. They make the patients who do experience severe pain feel isolated, or like they have somehow failed a "simple" procedure.
Clinicians in urology should stop pretending this procedure is painless. If you have had a similar experience, please speak up. Men need to know about these experiences before they walk through that door.
Finally, and this is really important, I am not saying don’t have a prostate biopsy if you need one, it could very well save your life. I am saying that be fully informed about what you might experience under the LATP procedure, look past the sanitised scripts and reassurances that you may be provided with and think very carefully if you would rather just opt for sedation.
You do not have to accept an LATP procedure despite the pressure that may be used to rush your decision.
As a patient, you have the legal and ethical right to informed consent.
I sincerely wish that I had never experienced this and opted for sedation, but I can’t change that, I can only recount my story here in the hope it will help other men faced with a prostate biopsy in making a truly informed decision about their treatment.
Edited by moderator 30 Oct 2026 at 12:55
| Reason: Not specified