I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error


How to stop feeling devastated?

User
Posted 07 Apr 2015 at 23:11

Stephanie,
Treatment in France was brilliant, and you get all your results before the doctor as it is your responsibility to take them to him, [I still have a CD of my scans], (I actually feel that if we had have had treatment here at that time, then neither of us would still be here! )
NO, the problem there was the language barrier and trying to find out what should happen next as I found I was being told what to have done rather than making my decision, like in UK you make your decision as to what treatment you have with the medics guidance.


Good for you to have some questions lined up, and yes you are, in a way, giving support to others purely by posting on here and letting us all know how you are getting on, it could help newbys.


When is your next appointment?


God Bless you and Graham.


 


PS. I like the Labrador avatar.  

Edited by member 07 Apr 2015 at 23:12  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 00:12

hi, Chris,

Sad that you couldn't continue with such brilliant service in France. But I guess the BigY'n knows what He's doing! Got the right treatment at the right time for both of you then brought you back here to continue your work!

Just found out this afternoon - appointment with the urologist this coming Wednesday. Is a urologist good enough, do you think? I've started to read the toolkit and it seems that there's oncologists, radiologists and urologists - will a urologist have a favourite treatment like the other two might, do you think? Or will he or she be neutral enough to speak without bias?

Graham says he's fine, but he looks so strained. He says he hates being "poggled" with - he's actually really squeamish, and I think, 'How the heck are you going to cope?' But he will - he will have to. And Lynn said I might be surprised, so I'm banking on that. But he needs something to help distract him; he doesn't run or have hobbies as such - he reads, but this just drives him into himself, sort-of dissociates him from his life. He sometimes acts as though he's sleepwalking, in a way, and I don't really know how to ground him. My concern is that this coming onslaught of treatment might crush his spirit - I mean, when I say he's squeamish, he feels screaming tension when he has a b*** corn done: he felt very traumatised after the biopsy.

I'm really concerned that he needs something to lift him out of feeling this almost pathological loathing for all things medical - he wasn't mentally present when I was going through treatment because he couldn't cope. He's 10 times worse if there's something wrong with him. He doesn't want to join the site - it means that he has to accept he has prostate cancer and the way he's dealing with it in part is to fight it in his head with not accommodating that he's got cancer whilst saying, "game on! Let's kill this thing - get it gone!" And I support that to a large extent - he has to fight it in his way.

I'm stumped - all I can do is walk beside him.

But thanks for your support, Chris, it's good to know someone's there when I'm all over the show and talking irrationally (sorry if I go off on one!).

And God bless you and Shirley too.

Oh, and the dog is Bertie, our Golden Retriever cross. The other one we have is Wisley, a Patterdale Terrierist cross! They both keep Gray very fit, thankfully. And make us laugh. They are a bit mad, truth be told!

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 01:29

The urologist is a surgeon so will probably lean towards prostatectomy. But usually a multi-disciplinary team looks at the results before your appointment and the uro will tell you what the MDT felt was available & suitable in your case. He / she may also recommend that you see an oncologist to discuss radiotherapy, brachy, etc.

John managed to get through the whole thing without ever reading anything and he has certainly never looked at this site. It worked for him - I did the research and the worrying, he developed a miraculous capacity to forget all bad news as soon as it was delivered and to wander through treatment, failure, recurrence, more treatment and then success without retaining any important stuff at all. Sometimes it has driven me mad but it has worked for him.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 14:07

I have mainly seen a urologist on behalf of a multi disciplinary team throughout the three years of my treatment so far. I will transfer to an oncologist when I move to more invasive chemo treatments. I did not have to face decisions about surgery or RT though did have that discussion early on with my uro. Although a surgeon he felt RT would have been the best option. In the end when bone met spread was discovered it became academic as I was on HT and on a different treatment path.

I have recently changed my uro as my original one has moved on. This was unsettling. I had become used to my first one, trusted him, got the explanations I needed etc the new one I am still unsure of. I guess what I am saying is that you have to feel comfortable with the lead contact for your treatment path. You have to trust their judgment. Of course if your OH has surgery the surgeon should be experienced so you can get the best outcomes.

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 14:35

Hi Steph


We initially saw a Urologist and like Lyn's experience - he wanted us to go down the RP route.


We then met the Onco who was so different in terms of bedside manner and explained to us that we did have options, and gave us a lot more detail and a lot more of his time.


I must admit that we were in such a 'state' of devastation that we could not take it all in and did not know what to do.


We were also not privy to this site.


In a haze, we went for the RP but it failed (during the op) as they noticed the lymph nodes were involved so we reverted to the RT.


My advice would be to take your time, read a lot, get advice from here and do not rush into a decision like we did. We had an awful time as we were panicking to get the treatment underway. We thought my OH would die if we did not. We had no where near the support we needed but I think that you will be much better placed to handle this than we were, from utilising this site alone, and your own work experience.


Depending upon the route you take you will have a Consultant Urologist or Consultant Oncologist looking after your OH, just make sure that you have trust in them, they are recommended and they take time with you.If they do not - find someone else.


Thinking of you,


 


Alison


 

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 18:45

I did not start using this site until I'd had my op, but this would not have changed my decision. Clatterbridge and Warrington hospitals gave me lots of PCUK material which was really helpful, but i get the impression this is not the norm. It should be!!!

Stay Calm And Carry On.
User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 19:47

Hi Steph,
I was referred initially by my GP to an urologist who arranged for all the  tests / biopsies that resulted in my PCa diagnosis ..

He did explain that my PCa was 'treatable' and I had a choice of treatments.... This either was RP or RT with HT, or possibly a combination of both...

Brachy was not recommended as an option for me because of the size and volume of my tumours(s) I was told...

I did go away and consider my options, but it was pretty evident after discussing things with my OH and another follow up consultation with the urologist that I just wanted my prostate removed so no need  for me to see an Onco
He said that if my details were  presented 'blind' to MDT teams around the country, in my case, most would agree that a RP would be the best option for me...

I was made aware that there was a chance that some PCa cells may have escaped from the prostate microscopically and I may need follow up RT, but until the Lab ' had the specimen in their hand'  no one would know for sure... This was a chance I was prepared to take together with the possible side effects of surgery to get rid of the offending gland.

Everyone has to make their own decisions based on their diagnosis and clinical staging at the time. As I understand things RT is just as successful as a RP in treating localised PCa
I learnt a lot from this site prior to my decision to go ahead with surgery and went ahead knowing that there would be risks involved no matter what route I took.

Good advice given by previous posters as always....

Easy for me to say now I know but, take your time and weigh up all of your options...... my consultant even offered to delay my op for a few months to allow me to go away in the caravan.... Needless to say I declined that offer and I told him the sooner it's out the better!
 A decision I have not  regretted.

Best Wishes
Luther



 


 

Edited by member 09 Apr 2015 at 19:48  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 21:55

Hi

I met with three surgeons/urologists and the oncologist twice before I made my decision. In the end I decided I wanted it out. I didn't want the toxicity of HT and im not sure I'd have been happy with the not knowing.

I then had to decide what surgery I wanted ie laprosopic or open...They didn't do robotic. I researched my surgeon. Paul has mentioned that their experience is critical. If you do discuss surgery you need to ask the surgeon how many operations he has done...what's his sucess rates. ..what's his thoughts on side effects and nerve sparing...what's his sucess rate re minimising continence problems etc

My surgeon had done over a 1000 of these operations. This was one of the main reasons I chose him

Bri

User
Posted 09 Apr 2015 at 23:57

Wow. Am feeling a bit that people still want to answer me. This really is a place where real people are, isn’t it?


Firstly, thanks for the explanation, Lyn. I did actually reply, but it never got printed, it seems. Now I understand the different disciplines, it makes a bit more sense of who makes up the teams. And your John sounds a bit like Gray – wants to wander through the treatment, but Gray just wants to get it over with; a bit like what Alison says. Meanwhile, if the tension doesn’t give me a six-pack and cure the constipation life will be even more cruel! I guess I’ll be like you – the carrier of the info and the worry! Well, not really the worry – he’s very drawn and tired; not sleeping at all well, a bit disinterested in life, a bit withdrawn. He’s worried, of course. But it’s brilliant to read of the stories of triumphs, like John’s and all the other conquerors on here – and there are so many, so I’m squirreling those away if I need to shore him up.


Paul – I’m really sorry to hear how unsettled you feel at losing the urologist you trusted. I really hope you find the new one is even better than the previous one. I guess I’d not even thought of trust. I’ll be trying to get a ‘feel’ for this guy when we meet him. I didn’t even consider that we might have time to make a decision. I’ve been reading it but it hadn’t clicked until now.


Alison - how come they noticed the lymph nodes during the op? Did they not see them on the MRI scan? And I hear you and the others saying take your time – I’m not sure I could convince Gray, but we will be talking it through. It’s odd, from wanting to know about what we’re facing, I feel very sluggish now, as though I can’t be bothered to read it all. I think it’s a bit of delayed shock and the aftermath of the devastation – sounds like you went thought the same thing: panic, panic. I’ve slumped a bit. But I get we need to trust the consultant. If we wanted to see someone else for another opinion on treatment, might that not put us back to waiting lists and delay the treatment, do you think?


Luther - thanks for your reply. Gray is like you at the moment – if it is possible to opt for it to be removed, then let’s go for it. I’ve led him to look at the treatment options and side effects, and told him of some of the stories of the folks on here, but he is of the mind at the moment to cut the b***** out and be gone with it. I’m praying that is inside the capsule and if that were the case, Gray could make that choice. But can anyone tell me, how do you know if a surgeon has a good track record?


And Bri – how come you were given the opportunity to see all those ologists? Did you ask to, or are we just allowed on the NHS?  And how come you knew what to ask?  How do you get to research a surgeon? What made you plump for yours? What if I ask and they don’t give me an honest answer? Or if I piss them off? And that’s if I have the courage to ask! And what if they have only done a few – what if we then want someone else? And am I allowed on the NHS … and how would we find one and choose them?


Aaaargh!


Sorry. Meltdown averted, normal cycle resumed, cup of tea, have a wee … thanks guys.


God bless. xx

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 00:17

You should be able to find loads of posts on here about the questions to ask the specialists - I have certainly posted them a few times as have others.

The best bit of advice we had from the urologist was to delay treatment, go away for a holiday and do loads of 'what couples do'. John didn't take the advice at the time he was in too much of a hurry to 'get it out' but we have both regretted this very much in the years since. It would have been so nice to have a last romantic holiday to remember and keep us going when things got tough later.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 01:06

Life for those of us diagnosed with PCa is never the same again moving on. How long is the "moving on" I wonder. And so do many, no doubt, the problem for most with that, is that nobody knows?

The diagnosis stage, as I understand it, is a journey, a journey where at some point one encounters the critical fulcrum point, the pivotal point at which if the right decision is not made, all is lost, potentially.

So, with PCa, a supposedly generally accepted "slo gro- cancer" what's to worry about on diagnosis? How many of us have been told how lucky we are to have ONLY "Prostate Cancer"?

Steph,

there needs to be a realisation of what you are facing. My thoughts on your Gray's position would be, if it were me, FFS get it dealt with asap and get him on the road to "cured" asap. The suggestion that you (He) should entertaining housing PCa, waiting and watching and wondering, is an interesting thought to entertain. At some point, and no one knows where or when, the tipping point at which a curable diagnosis becomes a "live a long as you can and medication allows" kick in, and of you have left it that long it is too late for a longer life.

He may be climbing the PCa hill and the peak (tipping point) maybe, or may no be, closer than he or you know?

If that optimum point has passed, this will be of little consequence, but if you have the luxury of time on your side, you may save the day?

IIWM I would not fanny about making choices and decisions. I would get them made and treatment started.

atb

dave

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 07:11

Steph I Googled my urologist. I then asked them the questions about their experience. They were more than happy to tell me. One explained that there was a new urologist at Hallamshire but based upon my questions they would make sure I didn't have him.

They all have to gain their experience but not on me.

The nurses at PCUK as well as folk on here told me how important the surgeons experience is regarding achieving all the outcomes we want ie cancer removal and minimising side effects. The PCUK nuse recommended a surgeon who has done over 200 operations of this kind and is still doing them. One of the surgeons I met was doing an operation about once every two weeks..The guy I chose was doing more than this in a day.
I saw the oncologist as I had to hear from her what her thoughts were.
As Dave says I personally wouldn't delay too long but I would want to be confident I had an experienced person at the helm

Bri

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 07:17

Lyn - how do I look for the questions in the posts when there are thousands of posts? Is there a section I've not spotted? And, oh, how we would love to be able to go on holiday. We have not been on holiday for over 10 years - and that was to Wales, never mind somewhere warm!

And Dave - thanks for answering: I'm more with you on the 'what's the tipping point' question, assuming the capsule's intact. We were told it looks like it may have reached the outer margin ... Gray is like you in the FFS get it dealt with asap, and I'm sure he won't be of the mind to adopt any wait and see - he wants it out and then deal with the aftermath, grateful that there will be one. There'll be no fannying here! If the capsule is intact, we go for it. Just remains to decide which way to jump, if we have the luxury of that decision.

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 07:40

Hi Steph,


 I think if I'd had the chance I would have opted for having the prostate out.  It's just natural to want the thing that contains the cancer, out of the body.  


Unfortunately, I didn't have that option and have to wait another year or so to find out if the radiotherapy has worked.  


Could be a nervous wait but fortunately, a heart problem came along to help me take my mind off it http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-laughing.gif.


Steve

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 11:32

Stephanie,
At the top of the page is a white oblong which says "Enter Search Item Here" try that.


Urologist is first "ologist"      Radiologist deals with Radio therapy / ex-rays      Oncologist deals with Cancer Treatment.


Than you could go to Radiologist or Oncologist next. Urologist deals with anything to do with Urine, then you go to whoever your 'TEAM' decide as to next treatment.


God Bless,
Chris.

Edited by member 10 Apr 2015 at 11:35  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 11:36

You just put some key words in the search box and it brings up excerpts of relevant posts. To save time, the main questions would be:
- % of patients with positive margins on pathology
- % of patients who go on to need adjuvant RT or salvage treatment in the next 2 or 5 years
- % of patients fully continent by 12 months post op
- % of patients able to have penetrative sex 12 months post op without needing mechanical or chemical aids

Many of the surgeons actually publish their success rates and you can also check out Dr Foster's website which gives data for most hospitals. However, if you are deciding by raw data, it is worth noting that the NHS definition of 'continent' is using one pad or less per day which isn't necessarily what most of us would think of as 'dry' and most of the published stats on erectile function following treatment for PCa report on the % of men able to have any kind of erection, regardless of whether that is natural or using a pump, tablets, injections, etc, whether loss of length/girth has made it too small for penetration and also regardless of whether it is sufficiently hard to have penetrative sex.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 10 Apr 2015 at 11:41

Dear Steph


You are in that minefield of information at the moment and just do not know what to do (we have all been there!). Once you make a decision it does make things a little easier. I agree with the 'no faffing about' route, once you are comfortable with the chosen route.


 


Alison - how come they noticed the lymph nodes during the op? Did they not see them on the MRI scan? And I hear you and the others saying take your time – I’m not sure I could convince Gray, but we will be talking it through. It’s odd, from wanting to know about what we’re facing, I feel very sluggish now, as though I can’t be bothered to read it all. I think it’s a bit of delayed shock and the aftermath of the devastation – sounds like you went thought the same thing: panic, panic. I’ve slumped a bit. But I get we need to trust the consultant. If we wanted to see someone else for another opinion on treatment, might that not put us back to waiting lists and delay the treatment, do you think?


 


They noticed 3 Lymph nodes were enlarged on the scans but were unsure if it was related to the cancer and said it was 50/50. The only way to tell was to get them out at the beginning of the op, then depending upon the results proceed with the prostate removal or not (as was the case!)...it was devastating as they kept us in hospital and did not tell us what had happened for 24 hours (lots of whispering outside the hospital door lead me to breaking point!!).


 


If you are not happy with the Consultant (and you may well be) then there may be someone else in the same team that you could see? Or you could go private to speak to someone at a local Bupa Hospital or in London. I am afraid to say that it depends upon your finances and available time/transport. You could ask your GP for a recommendation. I agree that you do not want to delay treatment unnecessarily. You really do need all of the facts before you go forward ie all the scans and tests done.


 


Apologies that this is rushed - got a toddler begging for breakfast!


 


Alison x


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

User
Posted 15 Apr 2015 at 19:06

Really appreciate all the advice, guys, thank you. 


Went to see the urologist today: the second opinion team have downgraded the results to Gleason 3 + 4 from 4 + 3. It's contained well within the capsule, only on the left hand side, apparently, with the right side clear and a positive find of 3 out of 7 cores. What happened to the other 5 I don't know, because 7 cores were taken, but we were too shell-shocked to think of that one on the hoof.


Gray has opted for the laparoscopy RP - TURP, is it? It seems that here are 2 surgeons at the Royal Preston (he didn't want the wait for the DaVinci at Manchester - he wants it OUT) and they both have done the ops for years. I've looked them up - can''t find anything on Dr foster's, Lyn, just a general download for how they do the assessments, and have tried to research the individual surgeons for their success rates, but seems they don't publish.   Rob the nurse specialist (good old Rob) said they were both very experienced and Preston is a very slick operation (no pun intended). so, referral will be done tomorrow and all in all, the lovely surgeon who said not a lot (but answered any questions) and smiled a great deal (but with a gentle, reassuring type vibe - has a good name also ... according to the other nurse specialist!) and he was quite positive that the thing is not too significant in either growth or aggressiveness.


We are both shell-shocked still. Good news in the worst news, now we find that a RP shortens the penis, as well as all the other stuff, but the aim is a cure, and ED can be managed, incontinence can be too and should (should ... ) get better within a few weeks to a year or so, and that maybe some of the nerve bundle can be spared on the side without the invasion and maybe... er ...


You're not wrong, Alison - I'm befuddled.


thanks for the info, Lyn. You've had a rollercoaster, eh?


Steve - I've heard of every cloud has a silver whatsit, but FH!


Going to give the search box a go but ...


brain crash. Need to commence sleep cycle. will resume normal transmission asap. 

Edited by member 15 Apr 2015 at 21:20  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 15 Apr 2015 at 19:23

Pleased that the results were good - best to edit your post though to remove the names of the consultants (one of the very few rules on here) before the moderators come along and do it for you :-)

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 15 Apr 2015 at 19:29

Surprised that the op might not be nerve-sparing .... Did they explain why? Also did they explain that ED is pretty much a certainty if the nerves are removed and so Viagra, Cialis etc wouldn't work? With nerves spared on one side, the chance of getting EF back is greatly reduced but not impossible - my husband had most of one side spared and got back his erections about 3 years post-op.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
 
Forum Jump  
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK