I was just wondering if anyone could help me with this. I had a trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy recently and was really supprised to see on the discharge notes that "no targeted biopsies taken" was written. This supprised me as in my notes it stated that the urologist was unsure from the MRI if the suspicious areas was inflammation or cancer - I'm a long time sufferer with prostitis.
I understand that small samples of tissue from my prostate would be collected, but it baffles be that any area of suspicion would not be targeted?
Could this be because under closer scrutiny it was deemed unnecessary? Negligence
Many thanks,
Chris.