I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

<123

Diet guidelines

User
Posted 11 Mar 2024 at 15:05

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

As far as I am aware, no-one on this forum is medically qualified? However many are very knowledgeable regarding prostate cancer.

I like to see links attached to support serious posts.

As they say on most financial advice sites.

Do your own research.

Knowledgeable - yes.  But that is anecdotal - based on their own experiences, experiences of their relatives, and experiences that have been relayed here.  

"Do Your Own Research".  Absolutely.  That does not mean going to Google.  It means calling the fabulous nurses here, a GP, a consultant.  

Why not Google?  I've got access to all the scientific research and published papers I wanted to check, through Google. Googling isn't a problem, its  the reliability of the information it directs to that needs treating with care. In another conversation of yours, I posted a link to a reliable scientific source, which you found interesting. I found it by Googling.

As for relying on the knowledge of GPs and consultants, there have been numerous occasions where people on this forum, have had good reason to question the wisdom of medical professionals. Clinicians are not always as knowledgeable as you'd expect. 

 

 

User
Posted 11 Mar 2024 at 17:28

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

As far as I am aware, no-one on this forum is medically qualified? However many are very knowledgeable regarding prostate cancer.

I like to see links attached to support serious posts.

As they say on most financial advice sites.

Do your own research.

Knowledgeable - yes.  But that is anecdotal - based on their own experiences, experiences of their relatives, and experiences that have been relayed here.  

"Do Your Own Research".  Absolutely.  That does not mean going to Google.  It means calling the fabulous nurses here, a GP, a consultant.  

Why not Google?  I've got access to all the scientific research and published papers I wanted to check, through Google. Googling isn't a problem, its  the reliability of the information it directs to that needs treating with care. In another conversation of yours, I posted a link to a reliable scientific source, which you found interesting. I found it by Googling.

As for relying on the knowledge of GPs and consultants, there have been numerous occasions where people on this forum, have had good reason to question the wisdom of medical professionals. Clinicians are not always as knowledgeable as you'd expect. 

 

 

What criteria do you place on a scientific paper that makes it credible to you?

I am finding that there are very good areas of this forum where people support each other, pass along their stories and explain what happened to them, pass along questions that a person needs to ask.  I am also finding there are some areas where posters are passing off medical judgments.  Somewhere along the way, some posters here have lost sight on the fact that this is a support network, not an amateur doctors and nurses network.

"Your father probably has PCa"

"You won't have a PCa issue for 10 years"

"You will have to have these treatments"

This is all advice given in the last two months about

1)  A Person who has not had an MRI scan,

2)  A person who had an elevated PSA and no referral to a Urologist

3)  A person who had an elevated PSA, no DRE and no MRI. 

 

This advice was given through a combination of Google, anecdotes, and just plain irresponsibility.  Unlike a GP, or a clinician, or a nurse who will have to answer for mis-information and mis-diagnoses, and who will have a complete process to follow - posters here can post whatever they like without any repercussions at all.  

I am not saying this afflicts all posters.  Many are incredible responsible and restrained when giving advice.  Others, though, are sometimes like a bull at the gates - itching to respond (for genuine reasons of kindness) without much consideration for what they have just advised.  Whilst GPs and clinicians are not infallible, neither are some of the more respected posters here.  When your car is broke, you take it to a garage.  When you have a medical concern, just ask the mechanic because he also posts on here as a self-appointed expert.

Like I say, and this is my last post on both this subject and this forum (because I am genuinely angry at the blase attitude to giving advice), to anyone who reads this.  Talk to your GP, talk to the nurses on this site.   That's where you will get the best advice.  Whilst clinicians are occassionally wrong, posters here are wrong a lot more often.  

I wish each and every one of you my sincerest, heart-felt best wishes for the future.  I hope the scientists continue to make breakthroughs in treatments, in monitoring techniques, and in understanding that - sometimes - no action is needed other than monitoring actions.  I suspect PCa cases will keep rising as more people get PSA tests - but how many will need intervention?  Hopefully an ever decreasing number.

Take care.

 

Ady

User
Posted 11 Mar 2024 at 18:46

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
 Somewhere along the way, some posters here have lost sight on the fact that this is a support network, not an amateur doctors and nurses network.

"Your father probably has PCa"

"You won't have a PCa issue for 10 years"

"You will have to have these treatments"

This is all advice given in the last two months about

1)  A Person who has not had an MRI scan,

2)  A person who had an elevated PSA and no referral to a Urologist

3)  A person who had an elevated PSA, no DRE and no MRI. 

This advice was given through a combination of Google, anecdotes, and just plain irresponsibility.

Ady

I think most of the comments you're complaining about  are from your conversation.

https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t30189-47-Years-old--Worried-about-PCa

You thanked one of them.

On the same thread you seem to question the advice of medical professionals. Yet here you say they're the ones we should all rely on?

What causes me most concern on here, are not people who post questionable opinions, or think they're Quincy M.E,  but people who post huge inconsistencies.

 

 

Edited by member 11 Mar 2024 at 18:50  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 11 Mar 2024 at 20:27

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
 Somewhere along the way, some posters here have lost sight on the fact that this is a support network, not an amateur doctors and nurses network.

"Your father probably has PCa"

"You won't have a PCa issue for 10 years"

"You will have to have these treatments"

This is all advice given in the last two months about

1)  A Person who has not had an MRI scan,

2)  A person who had an elevated PSA and no referral to a Urologist

3)  A person who had an elevated PSA, no DRE and no MRI. 

This advice was given through a combination of Google, anecdotes, and just plain irresponsibility.

Ady

I think most of the comments you're complaining about  are from your conversation.

https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t30189-47-Years-old--Worried-about-PCa

You thanked one of them.

On the same thread you seem to question the advice of medical professionals. Yet here you say they're the ones we should all rely on?

What causes me most concern on here, are not people who post questionable opinions, or think they're Quincy M.E,  but people who post huge inconsistencies.

 

 

 

I thanked a person for replying to me.  That is politeness.

I thanked every reply in that thread - because I appreciated that people took time to respond.  

However, if me wondering (not actually dismissing the GPs as quacks) why GPs were not suggesting things such as prostatitis, BPH, UTIs etc is a gross inconisistency with my statement that people should choose advice from a medical person instead of a non-qualified person then I am bemused.  If me defending medical practitioners is of greater concern to you than people suggesting people have cancer (based on 1 PSA test), that people have 10 years to go until they get PCa (based on one PSA test) and that people should stop eating certain foods (despite no concrete evidence that this will affect outcomes) then I think I can log off feeling pretty certain that not coming back here is a wise decision.

I wish you all the best in your journey, I am filled with admiration at how bravely people battle this terrible disease, but there is no way I am going to subscribe to half-cooked theories on diets, future outcomes, and current outcomes off the back of opinions formed on anecdotes rather than facts.

 

User
Posted 11 Mar 2024 at 21:32

Ady and Jules, I'll be sorry to see you leave. The more we have here the better.

I'm going to have a late super. A raw brown trout, organic cucumber, watermelon, and rocket sarnie, with vegan spread and drizzled with flaxseed oil. Washed down with a cold glass of soya milk.

Hmmmmm. Can't wait. 

Edited by member 11 Mar 2024 at 21:34  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 12 Mar 2024 at 00:50

Wow - I go away for a few days and all this happens!

Ady, if you are still reading, I agree with a lot of what you are saying. I regularly complain to the moderators or report posts when someone is giving unreliable or misleading information, and it is the reason that I will not engage in direct messages - all posts and responses should be published openly so that the cranks and trolls can be challenged.

In response to your specific question about diet and small boys - I have always been clear in my posts that there is no evidence that dietary changes in adult men will make any difference to getting prostate cancer, preventing recurrence when someone has had radical treatment. Many years ago, when I first joined this forum, a lot of the men were following the Jane Plant diet rigidly; it was often quoted because she was a doctor. In fact, she was not medically qualified but it didn't stop scared people from cutting out all manner of joys from their life. I tried to cut all red meat, dairy, etc out of my husband's diary but he cheated every time my back was turned so I gave up. It was when I asked the urologist about whether J was doing himself any harm by eating bacon sandwiches that he told us about the research on western diet and said the only thing that would have made a difference was cutting out meat & dairy before puberty. He pointed us to the main research sources.

If you are interested, look up the Prostate Cancer Research Foundation - they have been funding research on this since 2004 through Margaret Rayman of the University of Surrey. The research suggests as above - in addition, they suggest that some dietary changes might slow down the progression of advanced prostate cancer. PCRF has published a cook book which you can buy on Amazon - but they make the point that this is food for a healthy prostate, not for men with prostate cancer

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Healthy-Eating-Prostate-Association-Foundation/dp/1856268691 

 

Edited by member 12 Mar 2024 at 00:53  | Reason: to activate hyperlink

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 12 Mar 2024 at 00:52

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
I suspect this is in reference to me challenging unsubstantiated claims and misinformation - at no stage have I been inconsiderate to people, but I have challenged the information they are giving.

I don't think the moderator's post was aimed at you, Ady - I think it was a shot across the bow to those of us who are frustrated with Lizzo's snake oil posts. 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 12 Mar 2024 at 08:16

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
I suspect this is in reference to me challenging unsubstantiated claims and misinformation - at no stage have I been inconsiderate to people, but I have challenged the information they are giving.

I don't think the moderator's post was aimed at you, Ady - I think it was a shot across the bow to those of us who are frustrated with Lizzo's snake oil posts. 

Ady it seems to me you have been made to feel really scared about your prospects. The prostate cancer adverts on telly are scary, there should be more focus on prevention  and diet may play a role in  preventing prostate inflammation and prostate cancer Being proactive is a positive thing to do, LynEyre and others are more or less saying forget it - it all depends on what you ate as a teen and there's no proof -  but there is if you look for it.

Take tofu for example I know many blokes will groan at the thought of tofu my husband does  but in countries where prostate cancer is low consumption of tofu is high. Genistein is the active ingredient in tofu and soya products genistein is a phytoestrogen ( a plant estrogen) and it blocks DHT which is made from testosterone and causes prostate cancer DHT is what ADT s are trying to block.

Here is a link 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40242-013-3123-6#:~:text=Phytoestrogens%20were%20detected%20to%20down,expression%20by%20Western%20blotting%20analysis.

 

You need to tackle inflammation of prostate and you can do it through diet NHS doesnt specialise in this area 

Blocking DHT is key 

 
Forum Jump  
<123
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK