The problem is, you can never guarantee, with either surgery or RT/HT or surgery, what side effects you'll get. I did lots of research of both treatments and picked RARP because it only involved, if all went well, just one overnight hospital stay. The thought of having 35 hospital visits in 7 weeks for RT, I felt was too long a process for me, plus I'd have been risking the additional side effects of HT.
My younger brother had PCa 3 years earlier than me, he selected RT and HT and appears happy with his choice. I'm happy with selecting RARP.
The only thing I wish I'd given more consideration to was the chances of recurrence. I never thought it was mentioned enough during consultations. I think many blokes reckon that when they select surgery and have 'the bugger cut out' they think that's it sorted, but it often isn't. The risk of recurrence then comes into play. However the recurrence risk also applies to those on RT.
When you compare the outcomes and side effects of thousands of patients and side effects, there is very little difference between the two radical treatments. However, how each treatment affects individuals can vary enormously.
I joined this site after my surgery. In a way I'm glad I did, because excellent though it is, in my opinion, it definitely focuses and is very biased towards poor outcomes. The vast majority of posters here, have had problems, no matter what treatment they've had. This unbalanced picture can cause unnecessary concern. I suspect the vast majority of PCa patients treatments go well but we rarely hear from them.
The forum is superb for giving support and a lot of peer reviewed research can be found on here. However I think care should be taken when using personal experiences on here to make treatment decisions.
Edited by member 29 Aug 2024 at 15:04
| Reason: Typo