I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

123>

Really Worried

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 14:47
Hi, my husband Paul (62) has just been diagnosed with PC. His PSA was 5.7 and on his first biopsy of 10 they all came back negative, however his consultant was not happy when he examined him and requested he wanted to do another biopsy. This time he did 5 and he concentrated on a particular area, 1 was negative but 4 proved positive. As you can imagine it was an awful shock for us and the family.

Paul then had MRI which showed cancer contained and lymph glands not affected. He was given a Gleeson score of 7 (3+4)

Today we have had the results of his bone scan which thank goodness is clear. Now here we have a problem, Paul wants to have surgery done robotically as we have read that you have a far better chance of not having Incontinence problems and erectile problems. If anyone on this forum can give us any information on this I would be grateful. Our consultant has told us that as we live in Wales this type of surgery is not available and if we wanted to go ahead we would have to go to Bristol and pay the NHS £10.000 to say we were flabbergasted is an understatement! It seems Wales does have 3 robotic machines but haven't the specialists here that can use them so we have to go to England and pay, seems very unfair and what's very worrying is the fact that a lot of people do not have the means of getting their hands on 10k!

I would like to ask men who have had the surgery done by laparoscope how quickly did they recover etc also incontinence issues and were they able to have erections. I know both of these problems is worrying my husband very much. If anyone can help we would be very grateful.

Many thanks

Wendy

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:24

Wendy('s man)

It is not true that robotics provides significant (or any) improvement in side effects. Open, or traditional surgery, can be as good or better than any other type. The key point here is that the experience and quality of the surgeon is uppermost in the outcomes. The method used less so. It is the archer and not the arrow.

Conventional laparoscopic surgery is a difficult method to master and the robot makes this technique easier, though with a learning curve of 200 or more surgeries to approach mastery. A surgeon who has years of experience, who removes prostates weekly (or more often) and who has done hundreds with the chosen technique is the starting point of consideration.

I agree with the poster above that there are other approaches such as radiation or even active surveillance available. I assume that his diagnosis was by psa and not DRE.

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 12:08
Hi Wendy,

Although not having had a RP (RT many years ago) I do have incontinence problems so I can understand the concerns your husband has. I also can't empty my bladder and consequently am often caught short sometimes just by the act of standing up. HOWEVER all is not lost and I have learnt to live with it and moreover it has not restricted mine or my wife's life style one bit. If I am going out I wear a pair of "M savers normal incontinence pads" from Asda, these are a fully absorbent pair of pants that I wear under a normal pair of pants. Can I also point out that sometimes I have a bowel problem when again I can be caught short...believe me this is far worse. Only last week on a cruise (living life to the full) I was caught short and couldn't get to a toilet. Having got back to our cabin these pants had held everything with nothing even coming through to my normal underwear. Obviously not something that you want to happen on a regular basis but it does show you how good these things are.

Finally you can get a "Just can't wait" card that says "The holder of this card has a medical condition which requires the urgent use of a toilet".......PLEASE HELP

You can get this through www.incontact.org

So my message is, Yes it's not the best thing since sliced bread but it's not the end of the world.

Life is for living

Barry (alias Barrington )

Edited by member 29 May 2014 at 14:32  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:10

Hi Wendy

it is outrageous that living in Wales reduces your options, just a thought but has anyone talked to you about the alternative to RP, Brachytherapy. If your Husband's cancer in contained and his PSA is at that relatively low level I would have thought it might be an option. My understanding is that there are far fewer side effects and it is much less invasive than an RP.

Basically Radioactive seeds are inserted in the prostate and they kill the cancer from within, they stay active for quite some time and have been very successfully used for quite some time now.

Surgery was never an option for my Husband so I know there are many more people on here that can tell you all about Robotic and Laproscopic  surgery.

I do hope that you can get some more positive answers and guidance

xx

Mo

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:52

Hi Wendy,

 

It's not so much the difference in types of operation that one considers regarding incontinence & erections.

The two main points are;

1) Does the diagnosis prove accurate in that there is no spread found during surgery and therefore the erectile nerves can be spared from surgery. In other words, if the surgeon finds unexpected spread during either type of surgery, he may see fit to remove nerve bundles. This might be on one side only though. You should of course request nerve sparing surgery if possible.  It sounds as though it is likely nerve sparing  from what we know .

 

2) Incontinence usually boils down to surgeon skill and perhaps a bit of luck. Remember, under either method that regaining continence can take months in some cases. Either way, there is a risk albeit low.

 

Open surgery usually means a bit longer in hospital as the incision is larger. With the  robotic,  one is usually discharged the next day. But you still have the journey home which needs planning if a distance.

 

With four positive cores I'm more doubtful your consultant would be happy with Active Surveillance.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:07

Hi Wendy,just shows what a lottery the health service is,these Robotic machines don't come cheap and to have then stood idle beggars belief.

I am one who went down the robotic route so can't give any incite into open or laproscopic,but either way if its possible to have the nerve sparing then with a fair wind erections will come back either naturally like mine or with the aid of viagra/ cialis. Some men recover their continence quickly,some are not so lucky in that it is an ever present problem,as can be seen each of us is different,I was pad free at the 7 months mark.

With the results I'm sure they are not pushing for a decision right away,do research on the other treatments,its not easy but the best of luck to you both.keep us informed and keep asking what ever you'd like to know.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:25

Hi Wendy I had robotic surgery on 31/03/14, similar score to your husband I had PSA 5.8 gleason score 3+4 = 7 on day of OP surgeon advised if he could save nerves he would, but advised would take all nerves to get rid of cancer. After OP he said all went well was pleased with way OP went, he advised he had to take right side of nerves along with right lymph nodes as he thought 6% chance of cancer in nodes. I had catheter out 10 days after OP very concerned at time as incontinence was quite bad, I am now 8 weeks post OP incontinence has improved greatly only wear 1 pad a day now so have good control, also starting to get erections which is a relief. But as others have already advised the skill of the surgeon is paramount to success of OP.  I am going for follow up on OP next wednesday 4/06/14 to see how successful OP was, so will be worrying time will keep community informed, if I can help in any way just ask. Good luck in days to come know how stressful it is when first diagnosed.

All the best

Frank

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:33
Wendy

I had robotic surgery 7 weeks ago with a G7 (4+3). The cancer was contained, my PSA (only just found out) after 5 weeks was <0.01, so I'm jumping for joy. The incontinence and ED for me are well worth putting up with than what could have happened if I wasn't diagnosed. However, that's personal to me. I hope you are able to make the right decision and get the treatment you want when you want it.

Paul

Stay Calm And Carry On.
User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:47
Hi Wendy,

as others have said, the data suggests that outcomes are the same for keyhole and open RP in terms of continence, impotence and recurrence. The big difference is in inpatient time and recovery time from the actual op. There are other things to consider as well as the expertise of the surgeon - even though robotic surgery was available to him my husband chose to have open RP for a number of reasons:

- at our hospital the lymph nodes are not removed in keyhole RP and he had a suspect node which we wanted on a petrie dish just in case

- he had scarring from previous surgery (had his appendix out a few years ago) which makes keyhole RP more difficult

- the data at our particular hospital indicated that more men were impotent for longer after robotic than after open

- the surgeon felt that in John's case, he had a better chance of avoiding nerve damage if he could get his hands in properly!

Four years on, John is continent and there is no physical impotence although there is still some emotional baggage which is helped by tablets.

In your situation (not ideal, I know) I would think very carefully about the implications of having to travel a long way for treatment - clarify who will pick up the aftercare, consider the fact that he will continue to need PSA tests for many many years and that keeping contact with the surgeon who did the op is invaluable reassurance, will you have access to ED treatment in Wales even though you have opted for surgery in England, and so on.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:49
My only concern was getting rid of the cancer asap. Don't worry about the side effects - get rid of the cancer in the way that's best for you. Deal with what you have to deal with later. As you read the experiences of others, you realize how much easier it is to deal with if the cancer hasn't spread.

paul

Stay Calm And Carry On.
User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 22:25
Hi Wendy,

I had my Open RP 8 years ago, in fact it's exactly 8 years this Saturday. Robotic surgery at the time wasn't an option, in fact I'd didn't even know that it existed, so having to make such a decision wasn't something that could play on my mind. But saying that I never suffered a single day of incontinence. The ED side in my case is another issue, but given that the Cancer was not contained I'm happy to live with that small price to pay and still be here today. The ED can be over come by a little help through various means, if your into that sort of thing.

I think the key, as others have said is the skill of the surgeon. I know I was very lucky in that respect.

Cheers,

Stu

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 02:29
Hi Wendy,

As others have said, it is the experience and skill of the surgeon that is of paramount importance rather than the type of surgery. One advantage of surgery is that if it is found during the op or afterwards that all the cancer has not not been removed, it is usually the case that RT, often combined with HT, can be given to help attack the cancer that escaped the knife. If RT is chosen instead as the primary treatment, it is much more difficult to then remove the prostate due to the damage caused by the radiation and there are not many surgeons who will do it.

Barry
User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 09:55
Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Thanks to everyone for their quick replies.

My husband is so worried about the incontenent issues, erectile dysfunction etc I am doing all I can to help him by saying we will go through this together and take one step at a time. It's far more important to me to have my husband then anything else!

When he was diagnosed he asked the consultant what he would do in the same situation and he replied almost immediately "I would have it removed robotically" him saying this I feel has blinkered Paul in a way as he really hasn't looked at any of the other treatments. I have just listened to the videos of men with PC on here and I have to say I found it very enlightening.

I think we have to look at all the options now and then hopefully Paul will decide if it's definitely surgery for him, and which type to have.

Wendy, if it helps your husband to clarify his thoughts tell him about my father in law. He was diagnosed with similar stats to your OH but decided to decline any of the radical treatments because he was not willing to risk ED and incontinence and he refused HT because he didn't like the idea of man boobs, loss of muscle and lack of libido. He lived for only 4 years.

Now, in his case it was the right decision (not for us who miss him terribly but right for him) and he crammed an awful lot of adventure & memories into that time - but for your OH? Would he be happy with only another 4 years if he could instead get rid of the cancer and live for another 20 years with a tiny bit of a dribble when he sneezes?

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 12:41

Hi Wendy,

First of all I just wanted to say how gutting it must be to be told that you can't have this op in Wales without paying £10,000 !! Ludicrous !

Like all the other wives here I fully understand what you're going through.

My husband had RALP on 21st March of this year. He had only been diagnosed a few weeks earlier in January, so in his case things had moved along very quickly. Thankfully after MRI's, blood tests , biopsy's etc the results came back showing a very low PSA count of just 1:2.... of the 21 core samples taken only 4 showed signs of cancer and a Gleason score of 6.

His specialist nurse gave us various different options to consider, but he decided there and then he wanted it out !! quick sharp !!

Our local hospital didn't have the facilities for RALP so he was referred to UCH in London. From being diagnosed to having the op was just a matter of weeks, which in one way was good, less time to dwell on things, but in another way it meant he had little time to start PF exercises.

We didn't even stop to think of the after effects re. incontienece. etc.    Thankfully the operation was a complete success and he was home the very next day with catheter insitu. The catheter drove him nuts I have to say, not because it was painful , it was just uncomfortable for him and he said ( in his words ) it made him feel like an old man...I had to remind him he was an old man , being as he is 66 http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif..anyways long story short.....the catheter was removed after 10 days at our local hospital and at first things were very good. After about a week or so he seemed to use a lot more pads although he'd been completely dry of a night and whilst sitting since having the TWOC.

I won't lie to you, it did get him down, but now, some 9 weeks on we are seeing light at the end of the tunnel. For the past week he's been more or less dry with just the occasional leak, but things look so much better than they did a few weeks ago.

On the erections issue ( I'm blushing here as I'm old school ) well I really don't know, as we haven't gone down that route yet ( as far as I know ).

If any of our experience can help, please just give us a shout.

Best Wishes

Jane

 

User
Posted 31 May 2014 at 15:40
We used to live in Wales, so we understand the problem all too well. I wanted to have my babies in Bristol and had to pay £4000 each for NHS services....but back on to the PCa. My OH had a failed RP at Cardiff because they found during the op that it had spread to the nodes. The care we received at that particular hospital was far from satisfactory.

However the RT that we had at Velindre was very different and a very caring supportive service. In hindsight we wished that we had gone to a London Private Clinic for the op, afterall if you are going to pay for it, might as well have the best. Of course it depends on your financial circumstances, but if you could co-ordinate you op in Bristol or London and your aftercare in Wales that would be best.

My understanding is that it is possible to do this if you speak to the Consultant (and co-ordinate things through his secretary and your GP). Good Luck.

User
Posted 09 Jun 2014 at 16:38

dont know if this will help my husband also paul was due to have his prostate removed by robot but they were unable to do it as his pelvic region was too small so he had a open surgery

this was done on the 9th may he had is catheter removed 28th may and is recovering well

stress incontinence during day dry at night

 

User
Posted 16 Oct 2014 at 22:10

Hi Paul,

The purpose of the trial is to consider whether there is benefit from from early follow up RT after RP. Until the trial is concluded it is not possible to make an assessment. If your husband is keen to have RT fairly soon, the only way he stands a chance of getting this from what your consultant has told you would be if he is draw into the RT arm of the trial or after his PSA begins to rise, should this be the case. RT following RP is thought to improve the outcome of RP in some cases but it has to be established whether it is better to have the RT soon after RP or wait until PSA rises (if that happens). RP does the job for some men who may not need RT so they might be having radiotherapy they don't need in a bid to improve their overall chances of ending their cancer. Rather depends on how a man sees it.

Barry
Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:10

Hi Wendy

it is outrageous that living in Wales reduces your options, just a thought but has anyone talked to you about the alternative to RP, Brachytherapy. If your Husband's cancer in contained and his PSA is at that relatively low level I would have thought it might be an option. My understanding is that there are far fewer side effects and it is much less invasive than an RP.

Basically Radioactive seeds are inserted in the prostate and they kill the cancer from within, they stay active for quite some time and have been very successfully used for quite some time now.

Surgery was never an option for my Husband so I know there are many more people on here that can tell you all about Robotic and Laproscopic  surgery.

I do hope that you can get some more positive answers and guidance

xx

Mo

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:24

Wendy('s man)

It is not true that robotics provides significant (or any) improvement in side effects. Open, or traditional surgery, can be as good or better than any other type. The key point here is that the experience and quality of the surgeon is uppermost in the outcomes. The method used less so. It is the archer and not the arrow.

Conventional laparoscopic surgery is a difficult method to master and the robot makes this technique easier, though with a learning curve of 200 or more surgeries to approach mastery. A surgeon who has years of experience, who removes prostates weekly (or more often) and who has done hundreds with the chosen technique is the starting point of consideration.

I agree with the poster above that there are other approaches such as radiation or even active surveillance available. I assume that his diagnosis was by psa and not DRE.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 15:52

Hi Wendy,

 

It's not so much the difference in types of operation that one considers regarding incontinence & erections.

The two main points are;

1) Does the diagnosis prove accurate in that there is no spread found during surgery and therefore the erectile nerves can be spared from surgery. In other words, if the surgeon finds unexpected spread during either type of surgery, he may see fit to remove nerve bundles. This might be on one side only though. You should of course request nerve sparing surgery if possible.  It sounds as though it is likely nerve sparing  from what we know .

 

2) Incontinence usually boils down to surgeon skill and perhaps a bit of luck. Remember, under either method that regaining continence can take months in some cases. Either way, there is a risk albeit low.

 

Open surgery usually means a bit longer in hospital as the incision is larger. With the  robotic,  one is usually discharged the next day. But you still have the journey home which needs planning if a distance.

 

With four positive cores I'm more doubtful your consultant would be happy with Active Surveillance.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:07

Hi Wendy,just shows what a lottery the health service is,these Robotic machines don't come cheap and to have then stood idle beggars belief.

I am one who went down the robotic route so can't give any incite into open or laproscopic,but either way if its possible to have the nerve sparing then with a fair wind erections will come back either naturally like mine or with the aid of viagra/ cialis. Some men recover their continence quickly,some are not so lucky in that it is an ever present problem,as can be seen each of us is different,I was pad free at the 7 months mark.

With the results I'm sure they are not pushing for a decision right away,do research on the other treatments,its not easy but the best of luck to you both.keep us informed and keep asking what ever you'd like to know.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:25

Hi Wendy I had robotic surgery on 31/03/14, similar score to your husband I had PSA 5.8 gleason score 3+4 = 7 on day of OP surgeon advised if he could save nerves he would, but advised would take all nerves to get rid of cancer. After OP he said all went well was pleased with way OP went, he advised he had to take right side of nerves along with right lymph nodes as he thought 6% chance of cancer in nodes. I had catheter out 10 days after OP very concerned at time as incontinence was quite bad, I am now 8 weeks post OP incontinence has improved greatly only wear 1 pad a day now so have good control, also starting to get erections which is a relief. But as others have already advised the skill of the surgeon is paramount to success of OP.  I am going for follow up on OP next wednesday 4/06/14 to see how successful OP was, so will be worrying time will keep community informed, if I can help in any way just ask. Good luck in days to come know how stressful it is when first diagnosed.

All the best

Frank

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:33
Wendy

I had robotic surgery 7 weeks ago with a G7 (4+3). The cancer was contained, my PSA (only just found out) after 5 weeks was <0.01, so I'm jumping for joy. The incontinence and ED for me are well worth putting up with than what could have happened if I wasn't diagnosed. However, that's personal to me. I hope you are able to make the right decision and get the treatment you want when you want it.

Paul

Stay Calm And Carry On.
User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:41
Thanks to everyone for their quick replies.

My husband is so worried about the incontenent issues, erectile dysfunction etc I am doing all I can to help him by saying we will go through this together and take one step at a time. It's far more important to me to have my husband then anything else!

When he was diagnosed he asked the consultant what he would do in the same situation and he replied almost immediately "I would have it removed robotically" him saying this I feel has blinkered Paul in a way as he really hasn't looked at any of the other treatments. I have just listened to the videos of men with PC on here and I have to say I found it very enlightening.

I think we have to look at all the options now and then hopefully Paul will decide if it's definitely surgery for him, and which type to have.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:47
Hi Wendy,

as others have said, the data suggests that outcomes are the same for keyhole and open RP in terms of continence, impotence and recurrence. The big difference is in inpatient time and recovery time from the actual op. There are other things to consider as well as the expertise of the surgeon - even though robotic surgery was available to him my husband chose to have open RP for a number of reasons:

- at our hospital the lymph nodes are not removed in keyhole RP and he had a suspect node which we wanted on a petrie dish just in case

- he had scarring from previous surgery (had his appendix out a few years ago) which makes keyhole RP more difficult

- the data at our particular hospital indicated that more men were impotent for longer after robotic than after open

- the surgeon felt that in John's case, he had a better chance of avoiding nerve damage if he could get his hands in properly!

Four years on, John is continent and there is no physical impotence although there is still some emotional baggage which is helped by tablets.

In your situation (not ideal, I know) I would think very carefully about the implications of having to travel a long way for treatment - clarify who will pick up the aftercare, consider the fact that he will continue to need PSA tests for many many years and that keeping contact with the surgeon who did the op is invaluable reassurance, will you have access to ED treatment in Wales even though you have opted for surgery in England, and so on.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:49
My only concern was getting rid of the cancer asap. Don't worry about the side effects - get rid of the cancer in the way that's best for you. Deal with what you have to deal with later. As you read the experiences of others, you realize how much easier it is to deal with if the cancer hasn't spread.

paul

Stay Calm And Carry On.
User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 16:55
Yes Paul my husband just wants the cancer out just like yourself.

Lyn, your quite right, we will have to discuss the distance and follow up care with Paul's consultant, a very important factor.

Thank you Frank, hope all goes well for you next week.

User
Posted 28 May 2014 at 22:25
Hi Wendy,

I had my Open RP 8 years ago, in fact it's exactly 8 years this Saturday. Robotic surgery at the time wasn't an option, in fact I'd didn't even know that it existed, so having to make such a decision wasn't something that could play on my mind. But saying that I never suffered a single day of incontinence. The ED side in my case is another issue, but given that the Cancer was not contained I'm happy to live with that small price to pay and still be here today. The ED can be over come by a little help through various means, if your into that sort of thing.

I think the key, as others have said is the skill of the surgeon. I know I was very lucky in that respect.

Cheers,

Stu

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 02:29
Hi Wendy,

As others have said, it is the experience and skill of the surgeon that is of paramount importance rather than the type of surgery. One advantage of surgery is that if it is found during the op or afterwards that all the cancer has not not been removed, it is usually the case that RT, often combined with HT, can be given to help attack the cancer that escaped the knife. If RT is chosen instead as the primary treatment, it is much more difficult to then remove the prostate due to the damage caused by the radiation and there are not many surgeons who will do it.

Barry
User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 09:55
Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Thanks to everyone for their quick replies.

My husband is so worried about the incontenent issues, erectile dysfunction etc I am doing all I can to help him by saying we will go through this together and take one step at a time. It's far more important to me to have my husband then anything else!

When he was diagnosed he asked the consultant what he would do in the same situation and he replied almost immediately "I would have it removed robotically" him saying this I feel has blinkered Paul in a way as he really hasn't looked at any of the other treatments. I have just listened to the videos of men with PC on here and I have to say I found it very enlightening.

I think we have to look at all the options now and then hopefully Paul will decide if it's definitely surgery for him, and which type to have.

Wendy, if it helps your husband to clarify his thoughts tell him about my father in law. He was diagnosed with similar stats to your OH but decided to decline any of the radical treatments because he was not willing to risk ED and incontinence and he refused HT because he didn't like the idea of man boobs, loss of muscle and lack of libido. He lived for only 4 years.

Now, in his case it was the right decision (not for us who miss him terribly but right for him) and he crammed an awful lot of adventure & memories into that time - but for your OH? Would he be happy with only another 4 years if he could instead get rid of the cancer and live for another 20 years with a tiny bit of a dribble when he sneezes?

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 11:28
Hi Lyn,

Your post has really helped my husband this morning, thank you!

The reason he is so worried about the incontinence issue is going back to when he was in his thirties he use to always wee a lot. We saw a urologist then who did tests and said as a joke 'you have a bladder of a 70 yr old' but told him what was happening was that he didn't empty his bladder correctly so when he felt he had finished of course he hadn't. Now as he got older this condition has got worse so he feels with the op he has no chance of controlling it, that is why he is so worried about it.

Anyone else had this problem?

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 12:08
Hi Wendy,

Although not having had a RP (RT many years ago) I do have incontinence problems so I can understand the concerns your husband has. I also can't empty my bladder and consequently am often caught short sometimes just by the act of standing up. HOWEVER all is not lost and I have learnt to live with it and moreover it has not restricted mine or my wife's life style one bit. If I am going out I wear a pair of "M savers normal incontinence pads" from Asda, these are a fully absorbent pair of pants that I wear under a normal pair of pants. Can I also point out that sometimes I have a bowel problem when again I can be caught short...believe me this is far worse. Only last week on a cruise (living life to the full) I was caught short and couldn't get to a toilet. Having got back to our cabin these pants had held everything with nothing even coming through to my normal underwear. Obviously not something that you want to happen on a regular basis but it does show you how good these things are.

Finally you can get a "Just can't wait" card that says "The holder of this card has a medical condition which requires the urgent use of a toilet".......PLEASE HELP

You can get this through www.incontact.org

So my message is, Yes it's not the best thing since sliced bread but it's not the end of the world.

Life is for living

Barry (alias Barrington )

Edited by member 29 May 2014 at 14:32  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 12:41

Hi Wendy,

First of all I just wanted to say how gutting it must be to be told that you can't have this op in Wales without paying £10,000 !! Ludicrous !

Like all the other wives here I fully understand what you're going through.

My husband had RALP on 21st March of this year. He had only been diagnosed a few weeks earlier in January, so in his case things had moved along very quickly. Thankfully after MRI's, blood tests , biopsy's etc the results came back showing a very low PSA count of just 1:2.... of the 21 core samples taken only 4 showed signs of cancer and a Gleason score of 6.

His specialist nurse gave us various different options to consider, but he decided there and then he wanted it out !! quick sharp !!

Our local hospital didn't have the facilities for RALP so he was referred to UCH in London. From being diagnosed to having the op was just a matter of weeks, which in one way was good, less time to dwell on things, but in another way it meant he had little time to start PF exercises.

We didn't even stop to think of the after effects re. incontienece. etc.    Thankfully the operation was a complete success and he was home the very next day with catheter insitu. The catheter drove him nuts I have to say, not because it was painful , it was just uncomfortable for him and he said ( in his words ) it made him feel like an old man...I had to remind him he was an old man , being as he is 66 http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif..anyways long story short.....the catheter was removed after 10 days at our local hospital and at first things were very good. After about a week or so he seemed to use a lot more pads although he'd been completely dry of a night and whilst sitting since having the TWOC.

I won't lie to you, it did get him down, but now, some 9 weeks on we are seeing light at the end of the tunnel. For the past week he's been more or less dry with just the occasional leak, but things look so much better than they did a few weeks ago.

On the erections issue ( I'm blushing here as I'm old school ) well I really don't know, as we haven't gone down that route yet ( as far as I know ).

If any of our experience can help, please just give us a shout.

Best Wishes

Jane

 

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 13:49
Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Hi Lyn,

Your post has really helped my husband this morning, thank you!

The reason he is so worried about the incontinence issue is going back to when he was in his thirties he use to always wee a lot. We saw a urologist then who did tests and said as a joke 'you have a bladder of a 70 yr old' but told him what was happening was that he didn't empty his bladder correctly so when he felt he had finished of course he hadn't. Now as he got older this condition has got worse so he feels with the op he has no chance of controlling it, that is why he is so worried about it.

Anyone else had this problem?

Ah, I see your problem. John also had a bladder like old leather and problems with emptying and frequency - from the age of 35 he was on tablets for this. Did your husband not get any medication to help? In actual fact, having the RP has solved the problem, not made it worse as the not emptying syndrome is partly due to an overstrong sphincter and the surgery sorts this out. Tell him every cloud has a silver lining and he might be very pleased with the result - full sleep without multiple night loo trips and being able sit in the pub with a beer without his mates taking the p because he is always in the gents.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 17:06

I have just been diagnosed after a private  scan and my PSA is just over 13.I am 70 years old and am having my biopsy in 2 weeks.Up to now I have been treated privately but my doctor tells me that the national health treatment is just as good if not better.

Does the NH use up to date procedures like robotic?

Can anyone help me please.

I am so confused and worried and it seems that there are many decisions ahead for me with differing potential problems

 

User
Posted 29 May 2014 at 18:29

I went to the doctors last year because I wasn't emptying my bladder in the morning. That was when I was referred for a biopsy. My view is that if the robotic RP, which looks like it has been successful, gives me 20+ years rather than 4 as it did Lyn's Dad, then the short term incontinence and ED issues are a small price to pay. Prospective grandchildren, more holidays when my wife retires, and as much golf as I can play make it all worth while. I am not going to allow these issues to get me down. I know having PCa throughout my body would be a real downer.

Read Andy Ripley's thread, (Andy was an ex England RU International. It's a real eye opener and tear jerker. It might help focus your hubby's mind.

http://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t2678-Just-another-story#post2678


Although I use 4/5 pads per day, I am dry at night, and am sleeping through more often. I now pee in the morning like a fireman's hose - far better than I have for a long time.

Edited by member 29 May 2014 at 18:31  | Reason: Not specified

Stay Calm And Carry On.
 
Forum Jump  
123>
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK