I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error
12>

IRE

User
Posted 28 Dec 2021 at 17:17

I have been monitoring my prostrate for the last 5 years. After my second biopsy in Sept 21 I was diagnosed with intermediate prostate cancer- Gleason score 3+4.my prostate was in one area only with the rest of my prostate appearing clean .

After conversations with my urologist in Guildford it was suggested I look at various treatment option by speaking to the various specialists. I undertook a large desk top research and consulted HIFU, radical prostatectomy, proton beam therapy, and Irreversible electroporation (IRE is the method of focal treatment for prostate cancer)

Whilst IRE has been undertaken in the UK in London the main centre of excellence is in Frankfurt Germany . The results over the last 10 years have been impressive and of all the treatment methods for prostate cancer gives the lowest side effects. This is due to there being no heat damage like HIFU in treating the tumour. The company , Vitus, who undertake this treatment method  have had not one issue with urinary problems and v high sexual functionality results on patients treated. 
As I am active and wanted to minimise side effects as well as having optionality should there be a reoccurrence I opted for IRE treatment. 
For my treatment Vitus also used a very small dose of chemotherapy which makes it highly effective when used with IRE to treat the area just outside the target tumour.

Whilst  I sent all my MRI and biopsy details to Vitus they undertake their own MRI which includes a anal imaging device. The number of probes ( Nanoknife) they use depends on the number and size of the tumour. I had four but more complicated and multi tumours require more. This is a treatment method for more complicated and tumours nearer the bladder also . 
I arrived on a Monday for a MRI and discussions with the urologist and 
Prof. who has undertaken over 1500 of these procedures personally! My operation was on Tuesday and lasted 1.5hr. Recovery is fast and apart from a catheter I was eating a meal that evening and in no pain. The following day I had a MRI and discussion with the urologist who assured me everything was fine and then caught the plan home on Wednesday. 

My recovery has been good in that I have had my catheter removed and my urinary function is normal. Erection is slightly softer but I have already had an orgasm less than three weeks post operation. Whilst there is some damage to one of the erection nerves Vitus claim this repairs itself after 8-12 months as the IRE process preserves blood and nerves( unlike HIFU or radiation). 
I will go to Germany for a follow up MRI and PSA test in three months and a further one after six months.

The reason I have posted here with my story is I want other men affected by prostate cancer to consider this treatment option. Don't be out off by your urologist or local doctors ignorance on this as it stems from the fact it’s not on the NHS! Also most hospitals dealing with prostrate cancer have huge invested capital in more conventional treatment options. 
My choice of treatment was coloured by the facts this treatment method offers lower side effects, good recovery, and can be repeated. Vitus claim their results are equivalent to radical prostatectomy in terms or reoccurrence rates and side effects significantly better.

Whilst there are no silver bullets in terms of treatment options I wanted to flag this one as it’s not really highlighted in the UK as it’s not approved by NICE and consequently not offered privately either. The centre of excellence is Vitus in Germany and their web page and U tube pages are easy to understand and their service is first class. 
I am happy to chat to anyone who seeks further information 

 

Edited by moderator 28 Dec 2021 at 19:44  | Reason: Doctors names removed

User
Posted 28 Dec 2021 at 17:17

I have been monitoring my prostrate for the last 5 years. After my second biopsy in Sept 21 I was diagnosed with intermediate prostate cancer- Gleason score 3+4.my prostate was in one area only with the rest of my prostate appearing clean .

After conversations with my urologist in Guildford it was suggested I look at various treatment option by speaking to the various specialists. I undertook a large desk top research and consulted HIFU, radical prostatectomy, proton beam therapy, and Irreversible electroporation (IRE is the method of focal treatment for prostate cancer)

Whilst IRE has been undertaken in the UK in London the main centre of excellence is in Frankfurt Germany . The results over the last 10 years have been impressive and of all the treatment methods for prostate cancer gives the lowest side effects. This is due to there being no heat damage like HIFU in treating the tumour. The company , Vitus, who undertake this treatment method  have had not one issue with urinary problems and v high sexual functionality results on patients treated. 
As I am active and wanted to minimise side effects as well as having optionality should there be a reoccurrence I opted for IRE treatment. 
For my treatment Vitus also used a very small dose of chemotherapy which makes it highly effective when used with IRE to treat the area just outside the target tumour.

Whilst  I sent all my MRI and biopsy details to Vitus they undertake their own MRI which includes a anal imaging device. The number of probes ( Nanoknife) they use depends on the number and size of the tumour. I had four but more complicated and multi tumours require more. This is a treatment method for more complicated and tumours nearer the bladder also . 
I arrived on a Monday for a MRI and discussions with the urologist and 
Prof. who has undertaken over 1500 of these procedures personally! My operation was on Tuesday and lasted 1.5hr. Recovery is fast and apart from a catheter I was eating a meal that evening and in no pain. The following day I had a MRI and discussion with the urologist who assured me everything was fine and then caught the plan home on Wednesday. 

My recovery has been good in that I have had my catheter removed and my urinary function is normal. Erection is slightly softer but I have already had an orgasm less than three weeks post operation. Whilst there is some damage to one of the erection nerves Vitus claim this repairs itself after 8-12 months as the IRE process preserves blood and nerves( unlike HIFU or radiation). 
I will go to Germany for a follow up MRI and PSA test in three months and a further one after six months.

The reason I have posted here with my story is I want other men affected by prostate cancer to consider this treatment option. Don't be out off by your urologist or local doctors ignorance on this as it stems from the fact it’s not on the NHS! Also most hospitals dealing with prostrate cancer have huge invested capital in more conventional treatment options. 
My choice of treatment was coloured by the facts this treatment method offers lower side effects, good recovery, and can be repeated. Vitus claim their results are equivalent to radical prostatectomy in terms or reoccurrence rates and side effects significantly better.

Whilst there are no silver bullets in terms of treatment options I wanted to flag this one as it’s not really highlighted in the UK as it’s not approved by NICE and consequently not offered privately either. The centre of excellence is Vitus in Germany and their web page and U tube pages are easy to understand and their service is first class. 
I am happy to chat to anyone who seeks further information 

 

Edited by moderator 28 Dec 2021 at 19:44  | Reason: Doctors names removed

User
Posted 07 Apr 2022 at 17:13

Hi All

 

I outlined in my early post an alternative focal therapy treatment option for prostate cancer called IRE or Nano-knife. This is not a treatment generally offered in the Uk and there is only one research centre at Kings which offers this as private option although a few have been undertaken recently on the NHS. This treatment method was highlighted in the newspapers recently but sadly bad journalism gave the indication is was a treatment method being made available to all which sadly it is not.

I outlined my decision to undergo this treatment which you can read above but in short was probably the least invasive prostate operation, particularly compared with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy options, recovery was very quick, the side effects were significantly lower and it had optionality should their be a reoccurrence.

 

I had my operation in Germany which is by far and away the leading place of expertise in December of 2021. I have just returned from my three month post operation follow up

 

In terms of the operation this was a one hour procedure and I was eating two hours after the operation. The catheter was my only issue was some small and short lived stomach spasms caused by the electrical currents used. I travelled by plane they after my operation and walked through the airport. Whilst the two weeks with a catheter attached were uncomfortable, once this was removed I was able to pee normally. To date there have been no cases of incontinence using the IRE method and I am please to say that I have suffered no changes to my urinary functions at all.

In terms of erectile function I am pleased to say this is good. Its probably not as strong as before but still good. The consultant informed me their experience is that the nerves repair themselves after 6 to 9 months as with IRE there is no heat to breakdown in the treatment field so adjacent nerves and blood vessels are saved compared with HIFU for example which uses heat.

My three month check in Germany showed my PSA had dropped from 8 to 2.4. The MRI imaging showed all the tumour had been removed and there was no evidence of cancer elsewhere in nodes etc. Naturally I am delighted.

Physically there is no adverse effects and I am now back to full time training.

I have another assessment in Germany in three months time and will update on my results.

Whilst I have previously indicated IRE is not a silver bullet to treating prostate cancer it is an option that should be considered. The fact that it is not available on the NHS is incredibly disappointing and is a result of both legacy issues of conventionally therapies as well as only small data samples being available to satisfy NICE for inclusion on the NHS.

I have lobbied my UK urologist who is looking at my data to see if they should conduct trails using IRE to run along side their conventional treatment options. From my perspective my treatment option has so far been successful and I still have optionality of having the treatment done again should there be a reoccurance which conventional treatment methods don't allows as well as there attendant significant side effects. Interestingly the Germans indicate the reoccurance rate is the same as that of radical prostatectomy!

Sadly most UK Urologists will not identify IRE  as a potential treatment option due in the main to ignorance. It is therefore important you undertake your own research and see if this is suitable for you and put into the mix of options when discussing treatment options.

Happy to answer any questions.

User
Posted 01 Jan 2022 at 16:36

Ha ha no!

my only intention is to make people aware of treatment options. Sadly most uk practitioners don’t know about this and therefore it’s not even discussed. Given the significant side effects of RP and radiotherapy men affected by prostate cancer should look at all available options. 
That’s all 

 

 

User
Posted 03 Jan 2022 at 20:22

Today's Times references an article in the Telegraph saying IRE / nanoknife is being offered on the NHS at UCLH.  Here's an extract..

'...Men with prostate cancer have been treated for the first time on the NHS with a minimally invasive technique which uses electrical pulses to kill cancerous cells.

The treatment can tackle tumours which are hard to reach, has few side effects and does not require an overnight stay, helping reduce pressure on hospital beds.....

.. .The University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) has now used the technique on six prostate cancer patients.

The technique works by administering quick electrical pulses around the tumour to kill the cancerous cells by using electrodes.

Guided by MRI scanning, the pulses can be targeted to exactly the right area, posing fewer risks. The pulses are short and do not generate any heat, leaving the surrounding healthy cells untouched.

The pulses effectively cut open the cell’s membrane, inducing apoptosis, a process of programmed cell death...

....One of the first patients treated at UCLH was Neil Gershon, 70, who had the procedure in early November said: “What appealed to me about the electroporation treatment was that it was minimally invasive and very precise, also that the likelihood of side effects was very low compared to other treatments.

“It was all done in a day which was great. When the general anaesthetic wore off, I felt absolutely fine, no pain at all. It couldn’t have gone better.

The treatment requires the patient to wear a catheter for a few days after completion and Gershon had the catheter removed at his local hospital one week later....

Professor Mark Emberton, a consultant urologist at UCLH, told the Daily Telegraph that the technique was a “game changer”, partly because it was simple to train surgeons to use it.

He said that very few men were currently offered focal therapies, which include irreversible electroporation, the freezing technique cryotherapy and focused ultrasound.

“At the moment you can only get focal therapies in a few centres in the south of England — which is terrible,” Emberton said

“Around a third of men with prostate cancer could benefit from some type of focal therapy but only a tiny fraction of them even get a discussion about it.”

Emberton said that he hoped to see a rapid uptake of the treatment at hospitals across the country.

“It’s an amazing treatment — so quick. And it means we can reach tumours that are beyond where the knife can reach,” he said.

Natalia Norori, knowledge manager at Prostate Cancer UK, said: “Early studies suggest that treatments like Nanoknife could effectively treat prostate cancer while also reducing side effects for men.'

 

Edited by member 03 Jan 2022 at 20:49  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 22:30

My suggestion is you look at IRE as an option . Best to discuss with the Germans, Vitus, who have considerable experience . The fact NICE have not approved the technique is because the data is not long enough. Given there is little to no major work on this in the U.K. this is unlikely to change. 
The data from Germany suggests reoccurrence rates similar to RP without the side effects. 

User
Posted 18 Jan 2022 at 17:03
Hi I am a new member to this site. Looking at where to go next in terms of potential treatments. Looking at the posts is seems that there is no clear winner in terms of treatment for localised PC. Is that correct? Also i gather there is a lot of work looking at targetted gene and drug therapies. Some unsing Nano bots. Does any one know of any developments in these areas?

User
Posted 18 Jan 2022 at 18:46
I have responded on your own thread Martin.

For clarity, you could copy and paste your comment / questions here across to your own thread.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 11:15

Hi Paul,

Just a follow up to my chat with you in Jan and your last thread..As my PC is localised T2c (confirmed) I saw that UCHL were offering Nanoknife on NHS at this hospital. I contacted them and they requested my urology dept send them all my details. i.e. MTI, biopsies, MRI etc....this they duly did. On Feb 24th I received a call from *Doctors name removed by moderator*, who is the main man in this field in UK. He informed me that due to the position of the cancer...to near the sphincter to the bladder, that he couldn't get access so sadly I was not suitable. As I am Gleason 4-3 he suggested I start treatment...HT (bicalutamide for a month) and then 3/4 months of stomach implants (my first next Tuesday) before RT. I have an appointment with Radiologist 6th May. She said on last appointment she didn't think I would need further HT after RT.

So, in conclusion Nanoknife is now available on NHS at this hospital only.

 

Regards, John.

 

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/patients-and-visitors/patient-information-pages/irreversible-electroporation-prostate-cancer-ire-or-nanoknifetm

 

 

Edited by moderator 08 Apr 2022 at 15:27  | Reason: Medical professional named. Please remember group rules.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 15:28

Apologies...I wasn't aware...

 

John

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 19:55

Good luck!

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 10:57

Hi Desperate Housewife.  My pleasure. If OH PC is localised only, then it is definitely worth a referral by your urology dept. All the best. I have contacted "whatshisname" by email and asked if he would refer me to Vitus Germany as my PC is near bladder and Paul says that Vitus have far more experience dealing with this particular area than London and they do refer. Wonder why he didn't refer me? Maybe I will find out! Size of prostate at 99cc possibly but we shall see...

Regards, John.

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 11:01

Hi Paul,

Well done, it's always good to read of people having different treatments.  I've never heard of IRE but notice UCLH offer it for pancreatic cancer.    I haven't got as far as looking why NICE don't offer it for PCa but as you say it could be that existing treatments are regarded adequate bearing in mind other factors such as cost and skills.  Also does Germany offer it on their health system or is that a private arrangement?

A couple of minor points.  The ability to have an orgasm isn't usually effected it's the erection that is reduced.  Also do private hospitals only offer what NICE recommends?

It's also good that you say the procedure can be repeated.

Keep us posted.

Regards
Peter

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 11:47

IRE is more often referred to as nanoknife and we have a couple of members who have had this in the UK (see Dodgy https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t12802-NanoKnife ) and a couple more who tried to get on the trial but were not successful.

The main UK trial ran from 2013-2014 but was stopped because the outcomes weren't very good; the Prof was involved in this trial and then continued to work on methods of improving the treatment - he now offers it privately at about £10k


Here is the NICE report from 2016 - they don't seem to have been interested in it since then :-( https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg572/chapter/1-Recommendations 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 13:17

As I said treatment options are a personal decision. After extensive research this option offers lower side effects and optionality if there is a reoccurrence 

I self funded this do suspect private medical cover will not cover this. 
The Vitus centre treats people from all over the world who like me seek a more focused therapy. When I was there there was a patient from Egypt!

Whilst the NHS has many positives it does tend to preserve existing treatments and newer treatment methods may be disadvantaged. 

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 13:22

The UK experience with Nanoknife has been limited and the professor undertaking this in the Uzk is small scale snd undertaken as a research project. Why go here when you can go to the experts who have been doing this for over 10 years with 1500 procedures. Indeed more complicated cases by this professor are referred to Vitus in Germany

if you read all the research you will see the side effects are significantly lower. The NICE data is well out of date ! Look at more recent data from Germany 

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 17:01
Yes, the side effects were lower than for RP although NanoKnife should be compared with HIFU, FLA and cryotherapy rather than RP as it is aimed at the same group of patients: those suitable for but not comfortable with AS. Like HIFU, FLA and cryo, the recurrence rate is too high for it to be considered as a radical treatment.

It is always interesting to hear about overseas treatment though and for those who can afford it, worth considering. We have members like you and Barry who went to Germany for treatments, SS who went to America for FLA and I can't remember the name of the member who went to Prague for Proton beam therapy.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 18:20

Vitus claim their reoccurrence rates are similar to RP they also treat more Critical prostate cases that HIFU won’t do. As I stated this is no silver bullet but worth  investigating before  embarking on more radical treatment methods that may incur more significant side effects. Yes this is a private service but the costs are not so significant when set against the potential benefits.  

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 18:33

Thank you for highlighting the Nanoknife experience of “Dodgy”. Have to say that sounds awful and supports going to the experts in Germany rather than this UK research establishment. Results from Germany are very impressive and this should be looked at when evaluating treatment options rather than what “Dodgy” sadly experienced. 
If your urologist dies not know about this suggest he and you look at the research findings. 
whilst not a treatment option open to everyone it’s one worth considering as it has optionality which sadly you can’t get with RP or radiation treatments . 

User
Posted 29 Dec 2021 at 21:15
Hope your treatment works well for you long term. Most men are not made aware of all the treatments available, particularly if it means going abroad for some of them. So as would appear to be in your case, you need to investigate this yourself. Not all UK consultants are fully aware of what treatments are available in the UK let alone abroad. This means any insurers you have may not approve payment so the patient may have to self fund. This could prove to be an obstacle for some and the changing travel restrictions another at present.

Please let us know how it goes with you from time to time.

Barry
User
Posted 01 Jan 2022 at 13:57

Thank you Barry

Wishing you a happy New Year 

User
Posted 01 Jan 2022 at 14:44

Just thought I would post a study on IRE treatment which highlights the significantly lower side effects and out one rates similar to RP

Worth reading and considering as an option 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30986263/

 

User
Posted 01 Jan 2022 at 16:28
Are they paying you, Paul? 😂
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 01 Jan 2022 at 16:36

Ha ha no!

my only intention is to make people aware of treatment options. Sadly most uk practitioners don’t know about this and therefore it’s not even discussed. Given the significant side effects of RP and radiotherapy men affected by prostate cancer should look at all available options. 
That’s all 

 

 

User
Posted 03 Jan 2022 at 20:22

Today's Times references an article in the Telegraph saying IRE / nanoknife is being offered on the NHS at UCLH.  Here's an extract..

'...Men with prostate cancer have been treated for the first time on the NHS with a minimally invasive technique which uses electrical pulses to kill cancerous cells.

The treatment can tackle tumours which are hard to reach, has few side effects and does not require an overnight stay, helping reduce pressure on hospital beds.....

.. .The University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) has now used the technique on six prostate cancer patients.

The technique works by administering quick electrical pulses around the tumour to kill the cancerous cells by using electrodes.

Guided by MRI scanning, the pulses can be targeted to exactly the right area, posing fewer risks. The pulses are short and do not generate any heat, leaving the surrounding healthy cells untouched.

The pulses effectively cut open the cell’s membrane, inducing apoptosis, a process of programmed cell death...

....One of the first patients treated at UCLH was Neil Gershon, 70, who had the procedure in early November said: “What appealed to me about the electroporation treatment was that it was minimally invasive and very precise, also that the likelihood of side effects was very low compared to other treatments.

“It was all done in a day which was great. When the general anaesthetic wore off, I felt absolutely fine, no pain at all. It couldn’t have gone better.

The treatment requires the patient to wear a catheter for a few days after completion and Gershon had the catheter removed at his local hospital one week later....

Professor Mark Emberton, a consultant urologist at UCLH, told the Daily Telegraph that the technique was a “game changer”, partly because it was simple to train surgeons to use it.

He said that very few men were currently offered focal therapies, which include irreversible electroporation, the freezing technique cryotherapy and focused ultrasound.

“At the moment you can only get focal therapies in a few centres in the south of England — which is terrible,” Emberton said

“Around a third of men with prostate cancer could benefit from some type of focal therapy but only a tiny fraction of them even get a discussion about it.”

Emberton said that he hoped to see a rapid uptake of the treatment at hospitals across the country.

“It’s an amazing treatment — so quick. And it means we can reach tumours that are beyond where the knife can reach,” he said.

Natalia Norori, knowledge manager at Prostate Cancer UK, said: “Early studies suggest that treatments like Nanoknife could effectively treat prostate cancer while also reducing side effects for men.'

 

Edited by member 03 Jan 2022 at 20:49  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 04 Jan 2022 at 03:12

When I asked about IRE in 2015, just before my first HIFU procedure, I was told by UCLH that the trial they were doing had ended and it was too early to judge outcomes. I was not aware that they had started doing this IRE again and I was not told prior to my recent repeat HIFU that this would be an option for me, if indeed it was. (The lady Professor who gave me my HIFU at UCLH also administers IRE). However, I don't know whether this is within a trial. I will try to find out on my first follow up, whenever that might be. From the information on the net, it seems IRE is not yet approved by NICE and several references say that long term results/effects have still to be assessed. 

By opportunity of this post, I can say that with the exception of the considerable hurt I again experienced with the catheter, which is a common component of IRE and HIFU, (which was 98% better after removal 8 days later), I have not suffered any other problems whatsoever.  It was as though I had not had the procedure.  It will be interesting to establish how effective this second HIFU is and whether IRE could be used in due course if the HIFU doesn't complete the job this time.

Edited by member 04 Jan 2022 at 03:33  | Reason: Not specified

Barry
User
Posted 04 Jan 2022 at 07:45

With all of these focal treatments, you need data on retreatment rates and side effects thereof. HIFU does seem pretty good in that regard: IRE might be the same. But these are short series and we have a chronic condition (often two, including BPH)  with focal treatments attracting a younger patient base. I would want to know the German experience before I committed, personally.

User
Posted 04 Jan 2022 at 15:41
The stats for HIFU, FLA, green laser, cryotherapy, etc as a primary treatment are not great which is why they tend to be most suitable for:

- men who would be suitable for AS but don't feel comfortable with that

- men with co-morbidities who cannot have RP or RT

- men who are desperate to avoid the common risks of radical treatment and are emotionally (and financially if self-funding) robust enough to not be devastated if the treatment needs to be repeated or other salvage treatment is needed

- the altruistic who are happy to have a treatment knowing that it may not work but liking the idea that their experience will improve outcomes for others in the future

NICE view is that nanoknife probably fits into the same category of treatments

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 17:08

I understand that Nanoknife and HIFU are mostly suitable for low/intermediate PCa stages T1 and T2. Possibly higher on a case by case basis. My pre-RALP MRI and biopsies gave a diagnosis of stage T2b but my post-RALP pathology confirmed T3a and I understand these upgrades are not too rare but are accurate. Is there a danger with the focal treatments that the true T stage may remain undiscovered resulting in a higher risk of cancerous cells being left behind? 

 

 

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 17:32
Yes - but the same could be said of AS
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 17:56

... and that's why I came off AS and had RALP. 

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 22:30

My suggestion is you look at IRE as an option . Best to discuss with the Germans, Vitus, who have considerable experience . The fact NICE have not approved the technique is because the data is not long enough. Given there is little to no major work on this in the U.K. this is unlikely to change. 
The data from Germany suggests reoccurrence rates similar to RP without the side effects. 

User
Posted 17 Jan 2022 at 22:43
Who are you suggesting that to, Paul? Everyone in the thread has already had their radical / primary treatment.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 18 Jan 2022 at 17:03
Hi I am a new member to this site. Looking at where to go next in terms of potential treatments. Looking at the posts is seems that there is no clear winner in terms of treatment for localised PC. Is that correct? Also i gather there is a lot of work looking at targetted gene and drug therapies. Some unsing Nano bots. Does any one know of any developments in these areas?

User
Posted 18 Jan 2022 at 18:46
I have responded on your own thread Martin.

For clarity, you could copy and paste your comment / questions here across to your own thread.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 15:28

Hi Paul,

 I have read your thread with great interest. I am seriously considering going down this route. I was diagnosed last August with a Gleason 4-3  Stage T2c  with localised PC. 26 cores taken and only 1 with PC and only 30% of that core cancerous. It is in the middle of prostate also. According to everything I have read It is possible that I meet the criteria required. I don't know if size of prostate is relevant as mine is quite large, 99cc. Could this be a problem?

UCHL London being a Foundation Trust are, or have been conducting trials for Nanoknife. I have been in touch with them and they request my hospital forward my details which they have done. So I await their reply. I know Mark Emberton at King Edward 7th London is performing this at a cost of £12,500 plus Mri's etc extra, which if trials are not being conducted at present I am seriously thinking about as I want this out and don't fancy HT/RT. Could you let me know the total price you paid for everything in Germany if that ok? Also what were your PC details? Prostate size, how many cores, where were they, your stage/Gleason etc... Also what age when you had treatment?

Many thanks,

John.

 

 

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 17:08

Hi John

my prostate tumour measured 15mm on the left hand side of my prostrate near the capsular wall. There was no breach outside fortunately.
My Gleason score was 3+ 4 with some elements of 4 in the largest cell.

If you decide to go down the IRE route and can afford it then Germany is the place. My understanding is UCLA refer their difficult cases for IRE to Germany where they have been undertaking IRE treatment far longer. The cost depends on the number of Nanoknife elements required.They are expansive at 1000 Euro each- I needed 4 , bit more commonly 7 are required. 
In terms of cost this was €20000, this covered all travel , treatment and hospital stay( I was there two nights). Whilst I appreciate this is a sum many cannot afford, for me it was an investment in a treatment with fast recovery, fewer side effects ,comparable success rates with RP, and optionality in you can have additional treatments ( unlike RP, radiation treatments).

Travel to Germany is easier than a trip to London! 
The Germans also incorporate Electrochemotherapy  to run alongside IRE which is a novel way of providing additional cancer treatment on adjacent cells . Germany would be far and away the centre of excellence in IRE. 

Vitus who undertake this in Germany have an informative web site and can also send you additional information 

I hope this helps but let me know if I can comment further?

paul 

 

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 17:13

Apologies john

I am 66 and my prostrate is smaller 40. I am not aware prostate size is a key consideration. My biopsy only showed cancer in one area having taken over 20 core samples 

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 18:54

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Hi Paul,

 I have read your thread with great interest. I am seriously considering going down this route. I was diagnosed last August with a Gleason 4-3  Stage T2c  with localised PC. 26 cores taken and only 1 with PC and only 30% of that core cancerous. It is in the middle of prostate also. 

Many thanks,

John.

Can you check your diagnostic stats? You can't be T2c and only one positive core. T2c means they found cancer in both sides of your prostate? 

30% of a core being positive is a lot - not 'only 30%'. Will be interesting to see what focal specialists say but it looks to me like you have an intermediate risk cancer snd need radical treatment, not focal therapy. 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 18:57
Having checked your profile, you were diagnosed with T2a not T2c, I think.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 19:55

Hi Paul,

i was originally told by my oncologist back in August that I was a T2a. I had an appointment in late Nov with the consultant radiologist. her report was only received by me yesterday stating a T2c. This shocked me so I emailed hospital and a nurse rang me today and had the MRI/biopsy reports in front of her. She confirmed that a T2c was correct. She then proceeded to confirm that out of 26 cores taken, 25 were completely clear and only one was cancerous and of that one only 30% contained the cancer. The MRI showed only in one core slightly right of centre. I'm currently on AS and back for a PSA in March. My last PSA was 9.15.  I am 80 next April and my hospital wouldn't dream of RP because of my age. It grows more slowly as we age and as you know testosterone feeds the tumour and my levels are quite low. I guess I could die of something other than PC they recon. When you say diagnostic stats do you mean ask about the size?

John

 

User
Posted 20 Jan 2022 at 22:05

Hi John

i am sorry your biopsy was not communicated correctly earlier

It is not for me to suggest the best option for you. I have only outlined my treatment of IRE as there is little knowledge in the U.K. yet the treatment offers many advantages over more conventional therapies. Given it’s less invasive and given your age it is certainly worth exploring . 

 

User
Posted 07 Apr 2022 at 17:13

Hi All

 

I outlined in my early post an alternative focal therapy treatment option for prostate cancer called IRE or Nano-knife. This is not a treatment generally offered in the Uk and there is only one research centre at Kings which offers this as private option although a few have been undertaken recently on the NHS. This treatment method was highlighted in the newspapers recently but sadly bad journalism gave the indication is was a treatment method being made available to all which sadly it is not.

I outlined my decision to undergo this treatment which you can read above but in short was probably the least invasive prostate operation, particularly compared with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy options, recovery was very quick, the side effects were significantly lower and it had optionality should their be a reoccurrence.

 

I had my operation in Germany which is by far and away the leading place of expertise in December of 2021. I have just returned from my three month post operation follow up

 

In terms of the operation this was a one hour procedure and I was eating two hours after the operation. The catheter was my only issue was some small and short lived stomach spasms caused by the electrical currents used. I travelled by plane they after my operation and walked through the airport. Whilst the two weeks with a catheter attached were uncomfortable, once this was removed I was able to pee normally. To date there have been no cases of incontinence using the IRE method and I am please to say that I have suffered no changes to my urinary functions at all.

In terms of erectile function I am pleased to say this is good. Its probably not as strong as before but still good. The consultant informed me their experience is that the nerves repair themselves after 6 to 9 months as with IRE there is no heat to breakdown in the treatment field so adjacent nerves and blood vessels are saved compared with HIFU for example which uses heat.

My three month check in Germany showed my PSA had dropped from 8 to 2.4. The MRI imaging showed all the tumour had been removed and there was no evidence of cancer elsewhere in nodes etc. Naturally I am delighted.

Physically there is no adverse effects and I am now back to full time training.

I have another assessment in Germany in three months time and will update on my results.

Whilst I have previously indicated IRE is not a silver bullet to treating prostate cancer it is an option that should be considered. The fact that it is not available on the NHS is incredibly disappointing and is a result of both legacy issues of conventionally therapies as well as only small data samples being available to satisfy NICE for inclusion on the NHS.

I have lobbied my UK urologist who is looking at my data to see if they should conduct trails using IRE to run along side their conventional treatment options. From my perspective my treatment option has so far been successful and I still have optionality of having the treatment done again should there be a reoccurance which conventional treatment methods don't allows as well as there attendant significant side effects. Interestingly the Germans indicate the reoccurance rate is the same as that of radical prostatectomy!

Sadly most UK Urologists will not identify IRE  as a potential treatment option due in the main to ignorance. It is therefore important you undertake your own research and see if this is suitable for you and put into the mix of options when discussing treatment options.

Happy to answer any questions.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 11:15

Hi Paul,

Just a follow up to my chat with you in Jan and your last thread..As my PC is localised T2c (confirmed) I saw that UCHL were offering Nanoknife on NHS at this hospital. I contacted them and they requested my urology dept send them all my details. i.e. MTI, biopsies, MRI etc....this they duly did. On Feb 24th I received a call from *Doctors name removed by moderator*, who is the main man in this field in UK. He informed me that due to the position of the cancer...to near the sphincter to the bladder, that he couldn't get access so sadly I was not suitable. As I am Gleason 4-3 he suggested I start treatment...HT (bicalutamide for a month) and then 3/4 months of stomach implants (my first next Tuesday) before RT. I have an appointment with Radiologist 6th May. She said on last appointment she didn't think I would need further HT after RT.

So, in conclusion Nanoknife is now available on NHS at this hospital only.

 

Regards, John.

 

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/patients-and-visitors/patient-information-pages/irreversible-electroporation-prostate-cancer-ire-or-nanoknifetm

 

 

Edited by moderator 08 Apr 2022 at 15:27  | Reason: Medical professional named. Please remember group rules.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 11:22

Thank you John

It may be useful to contact Vitus in Germany. They informed me they do a lot of IRE near the bladder and have many referrals from *Doctors name removed by moderator* who declines these more difficult operations. 
Thank you for the update and wish you well on your treatment 

Edited by moderator 08 Apr 2022 at 15:16  | Reason: Medical professional named. Please remember group rules. https://prostatecanceruk.org/get-support/us

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 11:39

Hi Paul,

I asked *Doctors name removed by moderator* if I had gone private would it have made any difference and he said no. I did think about contacting Vitus but I have decided to go down traditional route  as he suggested it ASAP. As I have also had prostatitis (which alerted the PC) the radiologist said it is more difficult to treat. As my prostate is quite large 99cc she needs to shrink it first, hence HT for a few months. I will see how this goes and what MRI later in the year shows. If PC not completely cleared I will then contact Vitus. Does that sound like a plan?

John.

 

 

Edited by moderator 08 Apr 2022 at 15:21  | Reason: Medical professional named. Please remember group rules.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 11:48

Hi Paul,

On second thoughts, I will contact *Doctors name removed by moderator* at UCHL and ask him why I wasn't referred. See what he says.

 

John

 

 

Edited by moderator 08 Apr 2022 at 15:19  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 12:04

Hi john

All I can advise is you seek opinions then make your decision 

let me know what happens?

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 12:11

Will do.

John

 

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 15:24

Hi all, 

Please remember to respect the House Rules and not name medical professionals. 

"Don’t share the names of healthcare professionals who are treating you, or disparage particular hospitals or GP surgeries – publishing that information could be considered libel." 

Thanks and have a good weekend

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 15:28

Apologies...I wasn't aware...

 

John

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 17:38

Hi Everest90, we saw the oncologist today and asked for a referral to Dr Whatshisname.  Will let you know what the answer is.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2022 at 19:55

Good luck!

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 07:49

Dear Everest 90, thank you very much for the link to UCHL.  Very helpful.  

Hope everything goes well for you

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 10:57

Hi Desperate Housewife.  My pleasure. If OH PC is localised only, then it is definitely worth a referral by your urology dept. All the best. I have contacted "whatshisname" by email and asked if he would refer me to Vitus Germany as my PC is near bladder and Paul says that Vitus have far more experience dealing with this particular area than London and they do refer. Wonder why he didn't refer me? Maybe I will find out! Size of prostate at 99cc possibly but we shall see...

Regards, John.

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 15:13
"Wonder why he didn't refer me?"

Because he has already advised you that it isn't a suitable treatment for your case. He is one of the best in the world- if he says it isn't safe, there is nothing to suggest that a German doctor is going to be able to move your bowel somewhere else for a couple of days. Doctors in the UK are under no obligation to refer you to another country for a treatment they have already explained isn't appropriate.

Paul seems to like raising people's hopes regardless of their diagnosis - perhaps he is on commission... or isn't really a patient called Paul at all and is actually a German clinician trying to drum up some business 🤷‍♀️

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 15:41

Hi Lyn...I guess when you have this decease you look for any thing that might be able to sort it. I have taken what Paul said...perhaps he can let us know where he got any further info from. I do know Vitus have been doing this treatment for many yrs prior to the said surgeon. 

Paul?

It's too near the sphincter to the bladder not bowel..

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 15:55

Hi LynnEyre, if that is the case you could contact the German authorities and make a complaint.  They do take things like that very seriously and the Vitus Klinik would be very unhappy because they are relying on their reputation of being a reputable clinic.

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 16:42

I do not wish to get into any conversations on what treatment methods you should accept. I am real and my only aim is to make people aware of a treatment option that appears to have significantly lower side effects and better outcomes than conventional treatments currently offered in the U.K. There are legacy issues and long term data issues which prevent NICE offering on the NHS. It does not however stop patients researching and coming to there own informed decision. 

I won’t dignify giving a response as to my aims and legitimism - unnecessary and offensive   

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 17:06

Hi Paullondon, thank you for your report about your experience with Nanoknife treatment.  

User
Posted 09 Apr 2022 at 17:31

I would never intend to offend you Paul. I am grateful for all your threads on Nanoknife having experienced it yourself.  I have just looked on the surgeon's comments on a page from King Edward V11 hospital (not NHS) and he says " around 20% of men with localised PC benefit from it. It's useful for treatment of anterior tumours which would previously have been hard to treat. However it may not be suitable for all patients as the position of the tumour may mean other treatments are more appropriate" .....20% is a small amount relatively speaking.

Let's see what his reply to me is regarding referral to Vitus.

 

 

 
Forum Jump  
12>

Similar Topics

in Start here!
in Work, travel, and practical matters
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Start here!
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Personal stories
in Localised cancer
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Start here!
in Localised cancer
in Localised cancer
in Diet and lifestyle
in Side effects
in Being diagnosed with prostate cancer
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Side effects
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Sex and relationships
in Start here!
in Sex and relationships
in Social
in Start here!
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in Sex and relationships
in Side effects
in Side effects
in Supporting someone with prostate cancer
in Sex and relationships
in Social
in Start here!
in Sex and relationships
in Work, travel, and practical matters
in Side effects
in Being diagnosed with prostate cancer
in Localised cancer
in Localised cancer
in Being diagnosed with prostate cancer
in Supporting someone with prostate cancer
in Localised cancer
in Supporting someone with prostate cancer
in Advanced or metastatic cancer
in From the moderators
in Work, travel, and practical matters
in Supporting someone with prostate cancer
in Worried about symptoms
in Side effects
in Being diagnosed with prostate cancer
in Get involved with Prostate Cancer UK
©2024 Prostate Cancer UK